Discussion Board

SP expels Azam Khan for 6 years


Total 94 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
ANKUR AGARWAL
Now no Muslims with Mulayam
by ANKUR AGARWAL on May 24, 2009 06:48 PM

Since AZAM KHAN was only big leader in SP for muslims and Mulayam was enjoying a big vote bank.

Now no AZAM KHAN, no muslim vote!

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Mrityunjay Prajapati
Ajam Khan is Secular ?
by Mrityunjay Prajapati on May 24, 2009 06:44 PM  | Hide replies

Mr Ajam Khan want to be a Muslim leader he is not secular leader. If Congress is keeping the real secular position do not take this type of opportuniest.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
abdullah khan
Re: Ajam Khan is Secular ?
by abdullah khan on May 24, 2009 07:09 PM
they r not true leaders ... only such politicians create anti secular environment which disturbs the peace and harmony.. let us be what we are and do no endulge ourselves in the race of divide and rule politics

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ANKUR AGARWAL
Re: Ajam Khan is Secular ?
by ANKUR AGARWAL on May 24, 2009 06:49 PM
congress will not take him

   Forward   |   Report abuse
guru
sp party
by guru on May 24, 2009 06:15 PM  | Hide replies

WELL AS LONG AS MULAYAM AMAR AND MAYAWATI ARE ON THE HELM OF AFFAIRS ALONG WITH LALU THE ENTIRE UP AND BIHAR WILL NEVER EVER IMPROVE. WE WANT WELL EDUCATED, KNOWLEDGABLE AND INTELLECTUAL YOUNG LEADERS LIKE RAJIV AND HIS GROUP TO STEM THESE STATES OUT OF TROUBLE.

I AM SURPRISED HOE AMITABH IS ABLE TO RELATE HIMSELF WITH THESES PEOPLE. YOU MEAN TO SAY ONCE A BHAYAA ALWAYS REMAINS A BHAYYA?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
guy giggling
Re: sp party
by guy giggling on May 24, 2009 07:10 PM
Well, bihar and UP were under the auspicious leadership of congress for almost 50 years before they went towards lalu and Mullayam. UP has given almost all the PMs in the past except those from the South India. What kind of a progress could you boast of during the congress rule? In fact they are better off now. Not that I support either Lalu or Moulayam

   Forward   |   Report abuse
surendra singh
Re: sp party
by surendra singh on May 24, 2009 06:40 PM
Guru
Who turned aroun INDIAN RAILWAYS??????? From Minus 20,000.00 crore to Plus 20,000.00crore. Any one from IIM or HARVARD or THE LALU from Bihar. Bihar was spoiled by JANTA PARTY and not Lalu alone. First know the facts and then write

   Forward   |   Report abuse
iamnotlegend
Re: Re: sp party
by iamnotlegend on May 24, 2009 06:41 PM

Its the bureaucrats under lalu who turned around indian railways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
shalendra singh
Re: Re: sp party
by shalendra singh on May 24, 2009 07:08 PM
Dear Mr Surendra Singh ji, First know the facts and then write.. This turn around of Indian Railway was due to compuerisation of railway tickets of daily passanger (apart from reservation). About more than 20 millions daily passanger travel per day byIndian railways. There were big rackets going on where the daily revenues was not going in to the railways revenue and fake or reused tickets were being circulated by some railway officials and employees. This process of computerisation of daily ticket was started during the period of railway minister Nitish Kumar. Since Indian railway is a huge organisation and computerisation took time. By the time Lalu became the railways minister he got all the credit for the increased revenue. Increased Frieght rates also contributed to it. What Lalu is and what he has done to Bihar ....is well known to everybody.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Observer
Amar Singh ?
by Observer on May 24, 2009 06:14 PM  | Hide replies

Grassroots leader and a founding member deserted ....SP wont retain even 4 seats in UP that Lalu managed to get in Bihar.By the way, Azam Exit is BJP Gain , Split in SP votes, and did you hear Arun Jaitley harping a day before ..Non Congress space belongs to BJP.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Calspadeaspade
Re: Amar Singh ?
by Calspadeaspade on May 24, 2009 07:28 PM
If it is BJP be gain all the more better. We dont want these taliban guy like Khan ruining India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ram Sharma
Demolision of disputed masjid should not b an issue at all
by Ram Sharma on May 24, 2009 06:09 PM  | Hide replies

Why this msg - no 2 was reported for abuse? Let me know what is abusive in it, instead of blocking it.

Demolision of disputed masjid at Ayodhya in 1993 should not b an issue at all. Recently Modi removed so many temples and some masjids for development. In Lybia Col Gadaffi removed many masjids for development.

Many Mslims themselves bomb masjids belonging to other Mslims (Shia, Sunni, Kurd etc). Hence demolision of the disputed Babri masjid, which was unused also, should not b an issue at all. Pseudo seculars unnecessarily go on raising this non issue for the sake of getting votes of communal Mslims.

The good and secularists amongst Mslims should understand that for H1ndus Aydhya is very secred, as it is assosiated with Ram's birth place. Hence they themselves should propose to hand over the site for Ram mandir. But unfortunately there don't seem to b many seculars amongst Mslims and even if they r, they must b afraid of fatwas.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
dhanwad
Re: Demolision of disputed masjid should not b an issue at all
by dhanwad on May 24, 2009 07:17 PM
musslims will b majority in 20 years then we will see which temple will b there

   Forward   |   Report abuse
hyder jaffer
Re: Demolision of disputed masjid should not b an issue at all
by hyder jaffer on May 24, 2009 09:01 PM
Rightly said. Truth is always bitter.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
JGN
Unity is the need of hour!
by JGN on May 24, 2009 06:02 PM

Dishonest and lustful politicians have helped upper castes in disuniting non-upper caste Hindus (SC,ST,OBCs) and Muslims. This has resulted into revival of Congress in UP. The need of the hour is to forge unity against upper castes and their parties like Congress and BJP and eliminate their supremacy forever.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Vindhyavasani Pandey
Azam kkan
by Vindhyavasani Pandey on May 24, 2009 05:58 PM

Very good movement from SP.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
vivek bansal
sp expels Azam khan
by vivek bansal on May 24, 2009 05:55 PM  | Hide replies

Is this their secularism,all these regional
parties deserve to be put in dustbin,only
national parties should be allowed.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Calspadeaspade
Re: sp expels Azam khan
by Calspadeaspade on May 24, 2009 07:14 PM
That is the right move. He succumbed to such cheap tactics in defaming Jayapradha. Putting up her doctored half nude pictures. Supporting a cngress candidate. On top of it he wants loan waivers for his community. I am glad SP had the guts to do that.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 94 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message