Shall one read it as low representation as there should have been 82 Muslim MPs. 15% of 543.
Or shall one read it as over representation as in J&K it is 100% Muslim MPs, though Muslims are only about 60-65% of the total population? In J&K, if we go by proportionate representation, Muslim MPs should have been only 2 instead of 4.
For Gods sake will you stop this non-sensical statistics? You are only dividing the nation when in fact the normal voter is trying to unite.
Re: How to read it?
by True Indian on May 21, 2009 01:43 PM
For your Information From J&K, 4 Muslims out of 6 seats have been elected. How 100% in J&K ?????????
Please awake and understand what is the meaning of secularism as boasted by Congress and its allies. Please find how many tickets were given by Congress and its allies to Muslims in 2009 compared to 2004.IT MAY BE ALSO LESSER. Please dont get alineated by these pseudosecular parties and come to the main stream and live like Indians.
You seem to have missed at least two. One is elected from Wayanad in Kerala...MI Shahnawaz and the other is TMC's Suman Kabir, who got coverted to Islam a few years back.
The UPA now has enough clout and can introduce reservations for more Muslim, Christian and backward class MPs. The dynasty will then always be voted to power.
these things are capability and performance driven and not just based on your mere existence.
don't try to divide country based on arithmetic. by that logic, Muslims ruled Hindu for 400 yrs, British for 200 yrs, so now Hindu should rule Muslims for 400 yrs, do you agree?
