Re: Azhar as sports minister
by Indian on May 21, 2009 03:19 AM
Azhar getting elected is the joke of elections...He initially asked for Hyd/Sec'bad cont. But cong refused and gave him mooradabad as 70% are muslims. Now tell how many times will he stay in the backward state that too in a more backward constituency.
He is a onetimer MP...enjoy and make money....get away doing nothing...
-Banerjee had stated that she would not bargain for any ministry and she only wanted the ""development of West Bengal"". And how about other states? This is the kind of attitude which has led this country so bad. Every ministry wants to develop their state( They dont do that also) and they dont talk India as whole. Come on wake up politcians... Hope Mr.Manmohan takes note of these things.
Re: Railway development for WB but what about other states?
by raghvendra singh on May 21, 2009 04:20 AM
Hasn't she messed up the Railways earlier. I also remember lasi time some RPF persons entered a Sleeper bogie and went straight to a numbered berth to plonk themselves, only to find it allotted. They cursed to find that then new Rail Minister, Mamta had cancelled this allotment to them in all trains!!
Re: Railway development for WB but what about other states?
by Satish Govindarajan on May 21, 2009 02:29 AM
dude!! every state has their own MP's .... i would say that, those people will take care of their states. There is nothing wrong in her statement as a MP.
Re: Re: Railway development for WB but what about other states?
by Indian on May 21, 2009 03:21 AM
Logic is if every MP serves thr constituency efficiently and competitively automatically who country develops...so if she is desperate abt her constituency nothing wrong...
Re: I pray not
by slash excel on May 21, 2009 02:13 AM
Mamta is the right choice Laloo should be kicked out of India. Lalu does not even deserve the post of a servant in the parliament,forget about railways
why cant for once give other states a chance, out of every 10 trains six go to bihar and bengal and this will further increase. give a ministry to North east or south atleast majority of states will get trains then may the sardarji have some sense this time. mamta banerjee will ask for automobiles ministry and give ratan tata sleepless nights hah
Re: Kick Lalu,the slum-dweller out
by Indian on May 21, 2009 01:36 AM
Same thing with Ram vilas Paswan, who plays simply plays the Dalit card by showing 3 -4 MPS every time. he is Minister for Our Country for the past 15-20 years
Re: Kick Lalu,the slum-dweller out
by TZ on May 21, 2009 01:34 AM
If he is an uneducated, uncultured or whatever you are saying, you know his posiiton where he is, you cant even think about this, only a frusrated unemployed person can talk like this, who cant achived anything in life,
so dude we have to respect what he did for railway, we have all seen reduction in railway fare in each year, all minsters only hiked the fare but Lalu proved that without increasing in fare the railway could be in profit to concentrate on other things. i know he done mistake not going with UPA but still he accepting the mistake and will work together with UPA. God bless Lalu and whoever who is doing good work for aam aadmi
Re: Re: Kick Lalu,the slum-dweller out
by Indian on May 21, 2009 01:38 AM
This is only due to Nitish Kumar before that Mamta Banerjee who brought drastic changes in Ploicies of Railways. Ask any Railway employee he will explain you better.
Re: Re: Kick Lalu,the slum-dweller out
by romil phogat on May 21, 2009 01:45 AM
wow.... great...
Well as per my understanding, This result was not in any ways credited to Mr. Lalu, It was the outcome of policies which were being changed since last 10 years by some good Ministers like Nitish Kumar ets...
Re: Re: Kick Lalu,the slum-dweller out
by slash excel on May 21, 2009 01:48 AM
yes Indian, u r right about Paswan! It was Mamta who started the first reforms under NDA And the profit of railways is not Laloo's credit. Its simply because Indian economy itself was growing at an avg of 8.5% per annum so all the sectors got boost. Hence, it was no "Laloo magic".
@ TZ, and so dude stop glorifying someone(Laloo or anyone) without knowing the actual story. As you said, yes we should give credit where it's due(only!). For example, Chandrababu Naidu for Hyderabad,Modi for Gujarat(post-2001 reforms) But, idiots and thieves like Laloo does not deserve it
Re: Railways for Mamata?
by aniltiwary on May 21, 2009 02:22 AM
mr bihari i dont know how far you ur bihari or of any other state.no individual like u have the capibilities to judge the cabinet minister because u ar nothing more than a common man & whose voices ur not at all taken into account by the decision maker in the cabinet,analyse your self before making any comment or else you will be viewed as every body as foolish bihari & it will ruin the behari image.laluji has done excellent jobs in the railways which no railway minister in the past & in the near future will able to compete him.mamta banerjee does not possess the qualities & courage of laluji to handle the railways & that will be judge by the time itself.mamtaji is just like md- bin- tublaq an aggressive women without any specific vision.
Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Supra on May 21, 2009 02:21 AM
You are the first person to use Bihari with your name. Every Indian knows that "Calling Bihari a Bihari is an insult to him/her".
Re: Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Supra on May 21, 2009 02:24 AM
Come visit Calcutta and see hundreds of thousands of your brother pulling rickshaws, working as porter etc. Bengalis don't have problem for that. Why do you have problem with Bengalees then ?
Re: Railways for Mamata?
by sunny chakraborti on May 21, 2009 01:45 AM
talk indian, think indian. bottomline all indian are same- Unless someone is your own brother or father, nothing matters. remaining everything is money or give&take. will anybody give you a free mean,even if he speaks your language? Think professionally, so that you'll prosper in this new centiry.
Re: great mamtha for railway is good choice
by In Search on May 21, 2009 01:03 AM
Both leaders are Criminals, Thieves and Bandicoots, they only want more power to loot the people by scams or misappropriation of funds etc. Open your eyes and smell the Coffee my dear ignorant Indian :)
Re: Re: great mamtha for railway is good choice
by Supra on May 21, 2009 02:26 AM
Don't compare Mamta with Lallu as a person. Mamta is the most honest person any Bengali knows including the commies.
I think West Bengal is useless state and have produced so many useless personalities, which the foolish Bengalis think they are wise. Instead my Bihar is great which preferred to tread a progressive path under the Lallo Prasad Yadav. Unlike Bengal which is going to be doomed under the leadership of whether it is Buddhadeb or Mamta. because of its useless Bengalis shit
Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Great Nationalist on May 21, 2009 12:50 AM
You are right Great Bihari. These Bengalis can only bark and are lazy. It is we the biharis which are hard working people and bongs are jealous of us.
Re: Re: Railways for Mamata?
by rrrrrrrrr fgggg on May 21, 2009 01:27 AM
all biharis and bhaiyas and dravidians should be hacked to death. we should never have set them free. bengal, punjab and maharashtra should have freed themselves and let the other useless indians rot in hell.
Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Kashif on May 21, 2009 12:34 AM
I wont comment anything, coz i know you want ppl to fight betwn Bihar and bengal...just changing your name as greta Bihar wont help...you are cheap kameena from pakistan
Re: Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Great Bihari on May 21, 2009 12:42 AM
No I am not a Pakistani or any other, I am bihari staying in Calcutta and i am also not against any other state except bengal
Re: Re: Re: Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Great Bihari on May 21, 2009 12:47 AM
Because Indian constitution has given right to live anywhere, understood you thick ball of shit?
Re: Re: Re: Railways for Mamata?
by joy on May 21, 2009 02:06 AM
see that shows ur mentality...bihari. It is only because of Calcutta u people are able to earn bread and butter...but still shout....Bihairs won't change....ha ha ha
Re: Re: Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Kashif on May 21, 2009 12:46 AM
then for gods sake...behave as an indian..lets not abuse about any state any religion...all are precious as your own life...rather lets try to bring some constructive comments to help build better india...
Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Iam He on May 21, 2009 12:33 AM
Wow! Joke of the Century. Then, why you bihar! rikshawala, coolie, beggers are staying in WB for your earnings? Go back to Bihar or waiting to be kicked off?
Re: Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Great Nationalist on May 21, 2009 01:01 AM
Why should we leave? In fact we can kick you, you think of you are Raj Thakre to kick us ?
Re: Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Kashif on May 21, 2009 12:36 AM
have some sense..ppl like u gets diverted so easily...you never try to know the fact whether the other person is really a bihari or not...just abusing diff. state wont help..simply abuse that guy..he will get to know, his purpose will be defeated...
Re: Railways for Mamata?
by Tanmay Mukherjee on May 21, 2009 12:38 AM
You won't understand one thing that under lalloooooooooo.. you guys actually doomed.. i again persuade you to go through the books , history and jeoparady of bihar... i hope you know how to read.. LOL.. Ask Lalooo to read too if he knows...better be indian instead of being sate wise begger politicians.. Samjhe Bihari...
Re: Railways for Mamata?
by aam aadmi on May 21, 2009 12:47 AM
I think both bihar and west bengal are useless states. They are both chamchas of nehru-gandhi dynasty
On ibn7, Lalu has given interview in which he thank only Muslims as they have helped in defeating "Communal forces". So that majuority of hindus in karnatka , chattisgarh, gujrat are communal?? Is this seculisnm in which particular community vote in mass so that particuar party wins.No wonder why PM says that minorities( second largest minority who votes in block)have first right of nation's wealth( not the poor. downridden people).
Re: This is secularism
by Syed Moin on May 21, 2009 01:08 AM
Lalu is a clown, I dont know who takes him seriously... looking at the numbers, not the Bihar Muslims to say the least ;-) "First right" comment from PM was little irresponsible and also blown out of proportion. If reservations were meant to identify the "POOR" class, Muslims are poor and should get reservation: I guess thats what he MIGHT have meant. However being said all that, am neither from Bihar nor a pro-reservation policy for ANYONE supporter. Comments like these are meant to scare the minorities, to project the majority as demons (right wing parties do just the opposite) and trust me, so far these politicos have been hugely successful in planting this in our minds. No matter what, this elections showed that ppl have moved on from divisive politics and hopefully we won't see much blackmailing in parliament for next 5 years :)
Re: This is secularism
by Syed Moin on May 21, 2009 01:07 AM
Lalu is a clown, I dont know who takes him seriously... looking at the numbers, not the Bihar Muslims to say the least ;-) "First right" comment from PM was little irresponsible and also blown out of proportion. If reservations were meant to identify the "POOR" class, Muslims are poor and should get reservation: I guess thats what he MIGHT have meant. However being said all that, am neither from Bihar nor a pro-reservation policy for ANYONE supporter. Comments like these are meant to scare the minorities, to project the majority as demons (right wing parties do just the opposite) and trust me, so far these politicos have been hugely successful in planting this in our minds. No matter what, this elections showed that ppl have moved on from divisive politics and hopefully we won't see much blackmailing in the parliament for next 5 years :)
