Its shocking that BJP had to lose from its existing score , in fact the NDA could have logged close to 220 seats had they done some more planning , one key concern is they need to control is the other sangh groups for example Ram sena in Mangalore Belt from acting like moral police or a real vanar sena. BJP should now start focussing on bigger issues with young leadership and all their existing state govts should follow functioning like Bihar & Gujrat.If you cut away from Young generation then yu dont have a future.This UPA govt is going to perform much better , since sonia madam dreams of Rahul becoming the PM while congress in full majority , so that their family can dominate for another 30 years.And thanks to 'secularism' no other political party will ever want to check it. The BJP should reform itself to suit the times and carry on with its responsibility. If manmohan singh can talk that the anti-sikh riots are old story then stigma attached with Babri will also fade away....but only if you dont keep repeating it. First Educate Hindu's how their culture has been eroding since 1947, no need to hate others like Varun , but same time yu are not communal if you speak in the interest of Hindus in India. Make the Left & other anti-hindu parties your first target - cleanse them and then take on congress..
Re: BJP's loss
by neelam on May 18, 2009 06:01 PM
Ram sena candidates lost to BJP candidates dear. Before preaching collect some information. In Karnataka BJP swept.
Re: BJP's loss
by Supersecualirist on May 18, 2009 04:25 PM
There is a vast difference between a Sikh and a mus1im psyche. The latter will never apologige for any mistakes, however, grave it may be and will not forgive any mistake done by other community people, if it is very minor, until the 'oppressor' is finished or eliminated or humilated. BJP hoping go get the major minority community votes can never happen since they are defending the majority 'kafir' community.
Re: Re: BJP's loss
by niket on May 18, 2009 05:31 PM
so now if u do a murder of sikh and say sorry sorry it is fine. u said bjp wants hindu majority. Congress wants the total majority so it fine to support congress
The main reason for the BJP's defeatr (and for the Congress a Cake onm a Platter)was the inclusion of Ram Temple construction in its msanifesto. Modi should have stopped that
Re: Modi breaks silence
by Aditya Rawal on May 18, 2009 04:08 PM
I've read BJP's manifesto... They talk about building Ram Temple, Saving Ram Sethu, Cleaning Ganges... Nowhere is it mentioned that we would also look after Muslims & Christians employment, education issues of health & safety.... If you call yourself secular, you need to talk good about all religion and ot just blow h1ndutva ka baaja.
Re: Re: Re: Modi breaks silence
by SAM on May 19, 2009 04:41 AM
aditya, what were hindus doing in gujarat and kandhamal. Weren't they killing people. Terrorism in any form by any community is condemnable.
Manomohan Singh’s Jaadu - won Congress Modi. Won major seats in Gujarat but so so Madhu Koda wins a single seat Mamta Banerjees won max seats Mulaym Singh … so so M. karuna niddhi DMK wons in Tamil Nadu Mayawati ….. so so Lastly but not least MNS Maharastra Nav Nirman Sena Its also a winner, though they didn’t win a single seat BCOZ Their AIM was to keep BJP & Shiv Sena away from Govt and Finally they succeed & NCP congress alliance won SO MNS is also master
“L” = Looser
Lal Krishna Advani-BJP main leader – party lost Lalu Prasad yadav -RJD main leader –party lost LJP-ram Vilas paswan party didn’t score Left Front - Lost
“N” = Neutral
Naidu Chandra Babu = Ok in Andhra Pradesh Navin patnayak = majority in Orissa Nitish Kumar = best in Bihar NCP = OK in Maharsahtra NC = Farque Abdulla in JK Many more Such factors, which are rtight now not in my mind
Re: BJP Means after Parliament Election 2009
by rajeev srivastava on May 18, 2009 04:04 PM
BJP has nothing to loose. They are ruling in 7 states and have risen from 2 seats to 160. They will be required to push young blood along with elders like Congress did.See young Congress--Rahul,Jyotiraditya,Milind,Huda,Naveen etc.
Re: Re: BJP Means after Parliament Election 2009
by neelam on May 18, 2009 05:44 PM
Only one reatard will be left rest will be killed in accidents, check the congress history.
Re: We have just lost a battle not the WAR
by Sanjeev Gupta on May 18, 2009 04:07 PM
I agree! Some adjustments are required to show progress in party itself.
Re: We have just lost a battle not the WAR
by Aditya Rawal on May 18, 2009 04:12 PM
Don, have you been to Kutch??? Go to Gandhidham, you cannot drink normal water, you have to buy your water... Load shedding everyday in a city.... Modi's comment on development is all crap, he's only started saying this to attract more votes in other states....
Re: Re: We have just lost a battle not the WAR
by Mittal Stationery & Printers on May 18, 2009 04:25 PM
u douffer ...... kutch is the best under modi .. he has done a lot... i hve my village in kuch called megphar there was no water .. in the area no plants no farming... beacuse of him ... knw i see fruits,vegetables grown in the village because of modi.... plz go and check kutch first than comment on it ...ok he is the best
Re: Re: Re: We have just lost a battle not the WAR
by prasad on May 18, 2009 05:15 PM
You please come to Tamil Nadu. You know how we are suffering from powercut especially in the Coimbatore/Tirupur Region. See the Law and Order problem in Tamil Nadu. One kilo rice is costing Rs.38/- But our Chief Minister is claiming that we are getting rice at one rupee per kg.
Mr Narendra Modi - Defeat is not final, but only when anybody refuses to get up from the defeat that is final. Refine the RSS & Leave Ram and the Mandir. Concentrate on Ram Rajya You will be a better Prime Minister than Manmohan Singh as, if Gujarat is the show case of your efficiency, India will be your godown of efficiency to steer her to a better future. Look forward to seeing you as PM in May 2014.
1)Got carried away by middle class who r good sympethisers but non voters 2)Congress has less simpethisers but chunck of voters 3)Never told poor ppl (who vote) that there will be jobs and cheap food ...insted talked about white coller words inflation ,infra dev , less poverty which are used by professors in Economic class ...Rahul on other hand delived much better without speaking but having chai and chapati at poors hut , mixing with them and promissing them jobs ...THAT is what the voters need.
Now they should learn and develop plan for POOR and not filthy sympothisers middle class ..boot them at the earliest Work for poor , go their roots and be their simpothisers ..tax the middle class heavily they dont matter anyway
It is not modi but this Md. Azaharuddin who was totally involved in match fixing. Who was supporter of dawoood for match fixing. Spoiled the world of cricket. He is enjoying at center and people of india thinks this is secular govt.
