getting support from JD(S) is like digging graveyard for yourself.. both the devagowda and kumaraswamy are the worst morons of the century. They are experts in back stabbing.
Re: JD (S)..
by yathish on May 18, 2009 12:07 AM
devegowda and his son known for worst politics ,while they want power they enjoy the support any one,but insted of taking support of jd(s) better take support of SP
Congress calls itself secular. Considering Muslim League secular is a Joke, when they consider parties like BJP communal. BJP has a mix of all religeons in its carder.
"The Congress said all secular parties, which is defined as all those who are not with the BJP and the Shiv Sena [Images] are free to give support to a Congress-led UPA government at the Centre."
Wow! Now thats a new definition for secular! They are willing to take the support of Muslim League, MIM and so on but will not take the support of the BJP-Sena parties! If BJP-Sena are communal, what are MIM and Muslim League? I do not see any non-muslim from these parties ever getting tickets to contest an election. The BJP atleast has a few muslims contesting.
Interesting ideologies here. Inspite of being utterly and openly communal, these parties are "secular" where as BJP and Sena are "communal". Talk of appeasement...
We will hear mor esuch nonsense in the next few years!
Re: Secular?
by Anjukulam on May 18, 2009 12:28 AM
I am surprised that there are still some vestiges of BJP support hanging around in this forum. I thought all of the jingoes who had a field day on this forum had crawled back into the wood work. Please go and get a life. Your party is going to be splintered soon. Sad. There wa slot of theatre while it lasted. BJP: 1984-2009 RIP.
Re: Re: Secular?
by mariappan on May 18, 2009 01:12 AM
oh anjukulam, as a progenitor of the emergency/MISA/Press Censorship group, it is in ur genes to suppress the opposition's voice and u have spoken out exactly. All you cheering for congress doesnt understand, if at all there was one election which was good to lose, it was this election. Will see how many of you cheering here will do the same after a year and half.I know your pathological hatred to BJP will not allow you to support it, but then you dont have even the leftists to cry upon their shoulders.
Re: Secular?
by Lal Popat on May 17, 2009 11:37 PM
A secular party is one that does not unnecessarily kills the minorities (mostly innocents).
The Congress did wrong with the Sikhs in 1984 and has apologized time and again. They now have a sikh PM and even dumped Tytler which is also one of reason for there sweep in and around Delhi.
BJP/Shiv Sena have yet to any remorse for riots in Godhra, Orissa and anti North Indian pogroms in Maharashtra.
Re: Re: Secular?
by san man on May 17, 2009 11:48 PM
Apologized?? Congress field Jagdish Tytler for these elections, and he was only forced off the list due to intense protests from Sikhs! Stop lying! Congress apologies mean nothing!
BJP did not participate in the Gujarat riots! It was Gujarati Hindus who rioted, not BJP! They rioted after a train of innocent pilgrims were killed, not a train of BJP leaders!
You're obviously an ignorant backward person who makes up anything off the top of his head!
Why should BJP express anything for Orissa riots, when it was the locals who were rioting! An 80 year old man was gunned down unprovoked! You're obviously a hateful liar!
Re: Re: Re: Secular?
by Lal Popat on May 18, 2009 12:22 AM
Yeah but they did dump Tytler/Sajjan Kumar and have MMS as the PM. Rajiv Gandhi had personally apologized to Sikhs in the 80s.
Can BJP ever dump Modi/Varun and have a Muzz/Xtian as the PM?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Secular?
by san man on May 18, 2009 12:41 AM
They keep bringing Tytler back and dumping only after Sikhs protest again. Even when Tytler is 80 years old, Congress will be bringing this murderous rioter back again and again, and then after protests they will dump him and apologize. Stop lying and protecting your corrupt friends.
Rajiv Gandhi didn't personally apologize -- Rajiv Gandhi infamously said: "When a big tree falls, the earth shakes" As if this was justification for the murder of thousands! That fascist!
Modi never caused any riots! First the liars said "Modi didn't re-establish control quickly enough" then they said "Modi didn't do enough to stop the riots" then they said "Modi made himself absent during the riots" then they said "Modi allowed the riots to happen" (number of Gujarat policemen killed was unprecedently high!) then the liars said "Modi wanted the riots" then they said "Modi was happy about the riots" then they said "Modi pre-planned the riots" then they said "Modi wants textbooks on Hitler in the schools" then they said "Modi had a picture of Hitler on his bedroom wall as a child" then they said "Modi the Hitler-worshipping Nazi had been planning Gujarat riots since he was a small child"
What a bunch of disgusting liars you people are! There is no limit to your evil fanatical desire to lie! If Modi can be slandered and demonized like this, then it can be done to any one of us!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Secular?
by mariappan on May 18, 2009 01:14 AM
APJ Kalam was made the president of this country by BJP and your so called secular government didnt give such a scholar a second term.
Re: never include these people...?
by Lal Popat on May 17, 2009 11:38 PM
Laloos antics provide entertainment for us. Moreover he has been a very good Railway Minister so there is not much harm in keeping it.
As for Bihar it is already not in his hands anymore.
Re: Re: they will do bussiness with
by ramakrishnan s on May 17, 2009 11:00 PM
Well here anybody who is a devout hindu is communal while those who follow other religions are secular!!!!!!
