Discussion Board

Why Tamil Nadu chose DMK, rejected Cong


Total 415 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
deecee
Re: Nuclear fusion
by deecee on May 16, 2009 04:31 PM
Pillay,you write well and your observations on N. Indians and turban hits the target.Write some more. Write,Write.We r waiting for your flowery English and Tamil head.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
White Tiger
Hurray
by White Tiger on May 16, 2009 04:00 PM  | Hide replies

Hurray..

P. Chidambaram (Finance / Home Minister)
Mani Shankar Iyear (petroleum minister)
EVKS Elengovan (Independent Minister)
Tangabalu ( TN Congress Leader)

All these idiots ate mud this time....

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Ancil
Re: Hurray
by Ancil on May 16, 2009 04:05 PM
Don't worry they will come back through Rajyasabha...Ppl of tailnadu are fools to vote for DMK....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
White Tiger
Re: Re: Hurray
by White Tiger on May 16, 2009 04:07 PM
We should first abolish Backyard (Rajya Sabha)...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
John Bosco
Re:Baffing results
by John Bosco on May 16, 2009 03:51 PM  | Hide replies

The TN results are baffling.Cannot see why AIADMK wins quite well in Salem,Pollachi, Tirupur,Mayiladuthurai but loses elsewhere.It seems PMK has contributed virtually nothing.It does not seem capable of transferring votes as claimed.In Chennai AIADMK group loses closely.So it is clear that PMK has not contributed much and instead Vijaykanth has cut significantly into the AIADMK seats.DMK strategy of keeping him out was brilliant.Take Virudunagar,Vaiko lost purely because of Pandiarajan.Shows spoiling and strategy is very important.
DMK wins in Thanjavur,Perambalur,Tuticorin are impressive.Blows the usual alliance arithmetic out.
Above all while DMK-CONg portrayed Dr Manmohan Singh and Sonia AIADMK gave a vacuum.Nobody can really vote for a vacuum.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
White Tiger
Re: Re:Baffing results
by White Tiger on May 16, 2009 03:52 PM
DMDK is the spoiler in many seats...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aser
Re: Re:Baffing results
by aser on May 16, 2009 04:27 PM
to John Bosco,

AIADMK has done exceptionally well when the opponent was from Congress and not so well when the opponent was from DMK.

3 reasons could be attributed for that

1. people are generally not that unhappy with DMK run state govt as they are getting a lot of freebies, leave alone honesty and integrity in politics.
2. splitting of the anti incumbency votes with DMDK
3. strong muscle (money) power of DMK candidates, some going to the extent of paying Rs 500-1000 for every single vote, spending as much as 100 crores for a single constituency (now u can ask, can a MP earn that much in 5 years, yesm he can, especially if he is going to get IT/ communications/railway portfolio when his alliance forms the govt. that is the reason DMK heavyweights spent real big money this time )
4. How come in all the constituencies where the polling was close to 31-35% till 3 PM, and suddenly jumped to 72% by 5 PM? on an average 17% votes were polled on the last 1 hour (4-5 PM). bribing heavily the booth agents of the opponent party to enable illegal voting cannot be ruled out.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jackson
Re: Re:Baffing results
by Jackson on May 16, 2009 03:53 PM
all congress heavyweights are defeat .. which means .. lessons to be learnt.,

   Forward   |   Report abuse
White Tiger
Thank god - DMK Won
by White Tiger on May 16, 2009 03:48 PM  | Hide replies

As most of the bridges and roads are under construction in chennai and many project are in process already..

Now DMK has won and Congress has to beg seats from DMK.. Now, all these project will be continued..

In another way, I am sad, as congress has won.. Who will save Sri Lankan Tamils?.. Only God should save innocent lives..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
White Tiger
DMDK - Spoiler
by White Tiger on May 16, 2009 03:44 PM  | Hide replies

DMDK is the spoiler this time.. He has got more than 1 lakh vote in some seats... and on an average it has got more than 50000 seats in few seats..

DMDK has high chance in 2011 elections...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
White Tiger
Re: DMDK - Spoiler
by White Tiger on May 16, 2009 04:02 PM
Sorry, 50000 votes..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jackson
Money Thuggery etc.,
by Jackson on May 16, 2009 03:43 PM

Every Party does it in S.Asia .. the real reasons are .. ppl. still on DMK's side by far..

But the Congress is facing terminal decline if they dont mend their ways.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
becker
I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by becker on May 16, 2009 03:39 PM  | Hide replies

Cho's so called political magazine doesn't even sell 50000 and he is projected by few casteist elements as a political analyst. He has no standing in Tamilnadu.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
White Tiger
Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by White Tiger on May 16, 2009 03:42 PM
Well Said... Cho is a moron.. He told, Sri Lanka Tamil issue is not at all an issue in TN.. But it proved wrong.. that old guy is a crap... He is a Jalra (Trumphet) of JJ..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Balamurali Srinivasan
Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by Balamurali Srinivasan on May 16, 2009 04:07 PM
Hello Moron, your OWN M.K didn't support elam cause because he knows that it is not correct and prabhakaran is corrupt and a criminal and "WANTED" in india for rajiv's murder.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Hari N
Re: Re: Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by Hari N on May 16, 2009 04:26 PM
You nincompoop White (Paper) Tiger!

It is because of us brahmins that tamilnadu has, until recently, been producing candidates who made their mark in every walk of life! You morons can't do a thing except graze cattle! Our population is less than ten percent of the total population of tamilnad, yet we managed to produce a CV Raman! I dare you idiots to produce a Nobel Laureate in the next 300 years! Get lost, you loser!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
White Tiger
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opin
by White Tiger on May 16, 2009 04:37 PM
This is land of Dravidians.. no one asking you to stay here.. go to central asia..

go and read some mantras for begging...

Forward   |   Report abuse
RAM KUMAR
Re: Re: Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by RAM KUMAR on May 16, 2009 04:25 PM
Land of perriar means land of kannadigas? Then why you people fight with us for cavery?. We give leaders to you?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RAM KUMAR
Re: Re: Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by RAM KUMAR on May 16, 2009 04:24 PM
Land of perriar means land of kannadigas? Then why you people fight with us for cavery?. We give leaders to you?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
White Tiger
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opin
by White Tiger on May 16, 2009 07:42 PM
Don't do wrong propanganda... Periyar is a Tamil Social Reformer..

First, your language "Kannada" is not even original.. it is derived from Tamil.. you don't even have original language..

Forward   |   Report abuse
ravi krishnan
Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by ravi krishnan on May 16, 2009 03:52 PM
...am a tamil brahmin myself but the "white skinned" attitude of the English media in Delhi and elsewhere as well as their sheer ignorance of issues south of the vindhyas sucks!!!! in fact this proves to all of us that even after 60 years and the revolution of the electronic media,the " north" is oblivious of the " south"....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jackson
Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by Jackson on May 16, 2009 03:40 PM
his analysis is on par with Vadivelu (in the movies) .. IMO :-)

Its like US media quoting Jim Carey

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hari N
Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by Hari N on May 16, 2009 04:32 PM
Well you Idiot Becker!

If Cho is casteist, what is your "great" MK? Are you aware that you non-brahmin idiots are equally casteist? For your info. a Nadar would not think of marrying off his daughter to a Thevar boy! What do you call this, if not casteism?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SRI RAM
Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by SRI RAM on May 16, 2009 03:52 PM
Yes you are correct. I am surprised north media giving to much important to him. Selfish, greedy person

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Balamurali Srinivasan
Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by Balamurali Srinivasan on May 16, 2009 04:08 PM
cho is not selfish and greedy guy..go and check out his records and also records of whom you are supporting.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pat ram
Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by pat ram on May 16, 2009 03:46 PM
Can Becker suggest somebody else who has more clarity honesty and bravity in expressing?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
becker
Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by becker on May 16, 2009 03:48 PM
You can't advise a political party on one side and call you as a guy making general opinions. Won't you be biased?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SRI RAM
Re: Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by SRI RAM on May 16, 2009 03:57 PM
Right point,he always feels his own opinion as general public opinion.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pat ram
Re: Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by pat ram on May 16, 2009 03:52 PM
Cho advises all political parties. His advise was not taken by Jaya who proclaimed that she will fight for separate Elam.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
deecee
Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by deecee on May 16, 2009 04:38 PM
Cho is brilliant.His political commentsare astute.Congres donkeys dont like him becoz he speaks bitter truth and doesnt care for crumbs thrown by madam to her lapdogs like MMS

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ganapathy subramanian
Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by ganapathy subramanian on May 16, 2009 06:43 PM
CHO kept on mentioning in Thuglak that Vijayakant is going to spoil many winning seats for AIADMK. Exactly that had happened. MK's brilliancy wins many seats for DMK. Congress had won 9 seats. Srilankan issue is not the reason for the defeat. Vijayakant factor is the reason. JJ must have his alliance now.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chennai predator
I AM SAD TODAY there is no god or congress bought him too
by chennai predator on May 16, 2009 03:36 PM  | Hide replies

I am so shocked and sad to know that Mr.Vaiko lost his election in virudhu nagar, I cannot believe this, money and selfishness has blinded tamil voters and tamils have failed to appreciate and realise a true tamil spirited person like vaiko, he is one of the greatest orators that tamil has seen, his loss is loss for tamils like and the loss for eelam.

I am truly sad for vaiko.
I cannot believe tamil people voting for congress when they hunt down tamils in eelam, india is truly a most corrupted democracy, they have even hacked the electronic voting machines....money has taken over and has blinded people from seeing the best for a true india that respects people of all races, its golddigging for the italianwhor...there is no god.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
becker
Re: I AM SAD TODAY there is no god or congress bought him to
by becker on May 16, 2009 03:40 PM
Even I was shocked when he aligned with ADMK after being in Jail for more than a year!. Good orator need not be good politician.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SRI RAM
Re: I AM SAD TODAY there is no god or congress bought him to
by SRI RAM on May 16, 2009 04:02 PM
Yes Vaiko's defeat is shock

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Balamurali Srinivasan
Re: I AM SAD TODAY there is no god or congress bought him to
by Balamurali Srinivasan on May 16, 2009 04:11 PM
Srilankan president has said if you want tamil eelam you have to create some where else and not in srilanka.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Balamurali Srinivasan
Re: I AM SAD TODAY there is no god or congress bought him to
by Balamurali Srinivasan on May 16, 2009 04:10 PM
Srilankan president has said if you want tamil eelam you have to create some where else and not in srilanka.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SivaSankaran Sarma
Re: Re: I AM SAD TODAY there is no god or congress bought hi
by SivaSankaran Sarma on May 16, 2009 06:52 PM
Whi is he to say that. We Eelam Tamils are the original inhabitants of the land. The Sinhalese and the Sinhala people only arrived with BUddhism. FOr your information around 50 to 605 Of the present Sinhalese are purely descended from South Indian Tamil migratns who migrated to the island from the then Tamil speaking TamilMadu and Kerala. President Rajapakse's ancestors is one of them. SO he can go and create his pure Sinhala land may be in your backyard or Agraharam. Yo seem tobe more enamoured with him than on the plight of your fellow Tamils in Eelam. This is form a Jaffna Tamil Brahmin

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SivaSankaran Sarma
Re: Re: Re: I AM SAD TODAY there is no god or congress bough
by SivaSankaran Sarma on May 16, 2009 06:53 PM
50% to 60% of the present day Sinhalese

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
becker
I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by becker on May 16, 2009 03:36 PM  | Hide replies

Cho's so called political magazine doesn't even sell 50000 and he is projected by few casteist elements as a political analyst. He has no standing in Tamilnadu.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
jayendran k
Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by jayendran k on May 16, 2009 03:47 PM
Bcoz Cho writes the fact and his magazine wont give free articles....

In TN MK & family is only running all TV channels, cheap newspapers & magazines. They are using the media power and propagating whatever they want.

I dont know when TN people will escape from this family run government and politics...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
becker
Re: Re: I donno why Cho is called for poilitical opinions
by becker on May 16, 2009 03:53 PM
You can't advise a political party on one side and call you as a guy making general opinions. Won't you be biased?

How are you going to make impartial judgments when you are already an advisor to another party!?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 415 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message