Re: if Congress gets more seats than that of 2004,then its recogn
by Ram Sharma on May 14, 2009 10:17 AM
Both Cong & BJP r expected to get more seats than what they got in 2004.
Re: Re: if Congress gets more seats than that of 2004,then its re
by hmm on May 14, 2009 10:30 AM
BUT ANTI-INCUMBENCY WORKS AGAINST RULING PARTY ALWAYS .
Re: Re: if Congress gets more seats than that of 2004,then its re
by guest on May 14, 2009 10:24 AM
I dont think so, lets wait for 16th may you will eat your words.
Re: Re: Re: if Congress gets more seats than that of 2004,then it
by hmm on May 14, 2009 10:47 AM
anti-incumbency will not workj against congress- that means congress getting popular.
Re: Re: Re: if Congress gets more seats than that of 2004,then it
by Ram Sharma on May 14, 2009 10:26 AM
What do u think? Who will get more and who will get less seats?
Re: Re: Re: Re: if Congress gets more seats than that of 2004,the
by guest on May 14, 2009 11:05 AM
Congress 200, BJP 170, but lefties and others with 120 odd seats will support UPA.
If the left and the regional parties insists and do not extend support to UPA. UPA will be forced to support a third front govt from outside ,so as to keep the NDA out of power.
This time UPA will also not withdraw support midway as was the case some years back, as the congress has learnt the moment they withdraw support they also lose credibility ,and like the last time, it will pave the way for a clear NDA majority in the ensuing elections.
If karat can keep his folk together and bargain hard ,UPA will support the third front, Karat should not support the UPA as manmohan is a chameloen and once in power he will use moneybags to buy out pliable political parties just like the way he did it during the no confidence motion ( nuclear issue).
The less said about the the nominated PM ( opportunist manmohan ) the better, one day he says working with left was like bonded labor, and when he wants to hold on to power he says ,i enjoyed working with the left.
one day he says UPA is not one issue govt if nuclear deal is not done, world will not come to end.And Now to show off his bravdo during elections he says i would have resigned if nuclear deal is not done.
Earlier manmohan says regional parties are hurting indias growth now when manmohan needs the regional parties support he starts adulating regional parties.
Re: Third front Govt Possible
by rational che on May 14, 2009 10:13 AM
Before elections Manmohan said In the year 2004 we did not ask left for support. The left insisted on supporting us . now when the elections are over he says he will convince the left and other disgruntled allies to extend support.
Does india need such a PM who does not even remeber or stand by what he says.
Congress Use and Throw culture can be seen in every congressman be it Rahul Gandhi/ manmohan .Praising Naidu , Nitish one day and if thier objectives are not met castigating them within 24 hours is for all to see.
Re: Third front Govt Possible
by Ram Sharma on May 14, 2009 10:21 AM
MMS is a useless person and has become a big liar. When he had joined Rao's govt in 1989, he was a simple and honest person. He used to tell truth to the press. Now he is completely changed and participated in the shameless MP bribing on mass scale during trust vote. Earlier Rao has bribed only a few MPs.
What will be the influence of biased TV channels on the outcome of election results? Do these news people have power to polarise voters mind and bring Cong. in to power?
Indians are fit to be ruled by "secular" (means anti-Hindu) leaders lead by Cong. They have to pay heavily for their ignorence.
Re: Deserve
by Ram Sharma on May 14, 2009 10:11 AM
Media seems to hv sold themselves to Sonia Parivar. It is very dangerous. This Parivar already has a puppet President and puppet Chief Election Commissioner.
Re: Re: Deserve
by madhusudan thakkar on May 14, 2009 11:03 AM
Not only electronic media but print media is also equally biased.Less said about HT is better[Its Editorial Director is in RS courtsey Congress]Vir Sanghvi and Vinod Sharma are singing congress tune.Shekhar Gupta of IE along with Pranoy loses no opportunity to ridicule BJP at every opportunity.N.Ram bias is well known.Impartiality ofVinod Mehta & Gautam Adhikari is wellknown ALL THESE PEOPLE ARE IN FOR BIG SURPRISE ON 16th May.
Re: Deserve
by Arun N on May 14, 2009 10:13 AM
firstly, can you define secular? and secondly, if the congress or sonai can control the CEC and the prez, and the ministries, and the media.....then all it does is show the incompetance of BJP to do anything! when they cannot control a democratic govt in thier country, how do you expect them to protect a nation???
Re: Re: Deserve
by MM on May 14, 2009 10:19 AM
I have already mentioned the meaning of secular in the brackets. For example, some one supports Hindus,he is communal. If some one strongly supports minorities, he is secular (For example, the statement "country's first share of resources should go to Muslims" is a secular statement).
What a shame we don't have a proper leader to rule this country?. We have seen the performance of a slave turned prime minister who listens to Italian waitress even to go to restroom. Aren't you people feel ashamed?, u see movies like rang de basanti and comment that youth have power, where is all your power? Where is your will, courage. When a nominated PM could rule this country u, inflation was at 13% but still u were just watching his speeches, when there was blast u were watching his speech on TV. It is a national shame and u still have cowardness in your blood. This is your fate.
Re: It is a national shame
by Devinder Singh on May 14, 2009 10:25 AM
I think you are selfish. Had you been in USA, you could see the recession situation there and that too with the powerful president and other world famous leaders. Have you ever thought how the inflation use to hit the world economy and not a single country. It is all because of world slowdown. Even it could not have controlled, had the advani or vajpayee was there.
Don't be in blame game. Sonia doesn't know the micro or macro economics, it is MMS who knows this very well. May be on most matters, every party has influential persons. See good things/work may those be dictated by someone else or by own mind set.
What about advani? Isn't he being a slave of RSS. What RSS dictated, he does. So in that way he is also slave.
Re: Re: It is a national shame
by Speed on May 14, 2009 02:31 PM
It is your fate that u be a slave of congress then no one can change it. Do u know the impact of recession?, it is due to selfish motive people who couldn't rely on indian markets but concentrated on US market mainly. I am in better position to localize than any other people, what was your PM doing when there was a recession he could have waived off service tax, being a macro or micro economist which ever he is more in minority vote bank.
Re: It is a national shame
by satya samanta on May 14, 2009 10:12 AM
absolutely. the indian has lost mental balance and values for which they used to be no.1. people has strted going more towards hinzraaaaness then towards manness. their fate lies there.thanx GOD
Re: IN ALL PROJECTION ,CONGRESS/UPA AHEAD OF BJP/NDA.
by indiannationalclowns on May 14, 2009 10:09 AM
I go by the Satta Bazaar and the Mumbai bazaar says that BJP on its own will win anything between 190 to 200 seats.
Satta Bazaar is always accurate as the AAM AADMI is involved in it.
Re: Re: IN ALL PROJECTION ,CONGRESS/UPA AHEAD OF BJP/NDA.
by guest on May 14, 2009 10:17 AM
Yes, Bharat Jalao Parties Supporters have this as full time business.
Re: Re: Re: IN ALL PROJECTION ,CONGRESS/UPA AHEAD OF BJP/NDA.
by IndianNationalChors on May 14, 2009 10:24 AM
What is wrong about the Satta Bazaar, I know many Congress leaders in Mumbai running these satta bazaars, matka rackets etc. They have to earn a living too. Congress loves all these things.
Re: Re: Re: IN ALL PROJECTION ,CONGRESS/UPA AHEAD OF BJP/NDA.
by hmm on May 14, 2009 10:22 AM
YES BJP supportes started believing goons,drunkards,juadis of satta bazar.
- High population and still growing. in 1947 our population was 33 cr, which has grown upto 115 cr. Whereas land area is constant. One child norm (as in China since 1979) with provision of first child after 25 yrs of age must b enforced all over the world.
- Consumerism. High level of consumerism combined with high population means high air & water pollution, shortage of water, petroleum products, food items and global warming. Simple living must b promoted and there should b control on wasteful use of electricity, petroleum products and water.
- Corruption. Corruption has increased tremendously. Most of the politicians ruling us and making laws r highly corrupt. They were traded like goats during trust vote. many of them change parties and alliances as fast as Shivraj Patil changes his suits. People should not elect corrupt people in elections.
- Terrorism. Religion based terrorism started in 1987 in K'shmir. There was Khalistan based terrorim for some yrs in Punjab. Now religion based terrorism has spread all over. There were even reports of meeting between Dawood & Talibanese chief in Swat to put up Talibanese candidates in Loksabha elections. We must improve our survelience and inteligence. Pro Pak people like Antule should not b part of the new govt and good Muslims should b encouraged to dissociate themselves from terrorists.
All right thinking people should think further on how to remove these problems.
Re: Re: 4 biggest problems and their solution
by karuna karan on May 14, 2009 10:15 AM
CORRUPTION IS THE ONE AND ONLY PROBLEM FROM WHERE ALL THE EVILS ARISE. IT SHOULD BE ERADICATED. PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY IN POOR COUNTRIES CORRUPTION IS RAMPANT.
