For past 4 years an Italian is ruling the nation through an Indian proxy supported from outside by Chinese agents and their Pakistani sympathisers who think SIMI is not anti-national but secular.
I am surprised to see remarks of Sri Man Mohan Singh on shaking hand and hugging of Modi and Nitish at Ludhiana. No only the PM but almost all the parties in power are singing the same song. What surprises most is that when a PM of teh cuntry says so. If you think Modi is communal and a criminal why don't you throw him out, you have all the powers and means. What stops you to do so. If you agree that in a democratic country it is not allowed because he was chosen by the mass public. Then you should realise that what modi did or endoresed was a voice of the mass. and then why this chik-chik. Just keep quite and see what happens. If modi has support from public you can not do any harm to him and he will rule the public. There is no question of secularism then. It shows your maturity and mind status.
Re: mms 's remark on Modi and Nitish shaking hand.
by sunder on May 12, 2009 11:55 AM
What shall we call MMS---The Traitor? If u go by his logic that Nitish Kumar shook hands with Modi and hence he is communal then MMS is definately a Traitor when he shook hands/hugging Gen.Musharuff/Zardari who are known and sworn enimies of this country.
Re: Re: mms 's remark on Modi and Nitish shaking hand.
by dinesh parashar on May 12, 2009 11:25 PM
I do agree with Sunder, good statement..lalu and Paswan are losing their ground and their statement is showing their helplesness...They have nothing more then the word 'Secular'to misguide Bihar People..15 years of Lalu's rule have made Biharis, aliens in Indis, now Nithish is doing some good work and they have nothing more to say then accusing him for hugging MODI..pitty on both of them but for MMS i have never expected that at the age of 78..How long he will take to become mature? Madam ki godi se bahar kab aayenge...Rahul bhi ab to kuch kaam ki baat karta hai....
The last round attempt to smear NDA with a communal tag by Hon Manmohan Singh is quite unfortunate since it has grave implication for economic and strategic security of India.
Mr. Singh for sound reasons is credible in West and his perceptions likely to be taken seriously by West. This makes allaying such fear as unfounded, if NDA wins, lot more difficult and shall come only at the expense of Mr. Singh's long term credibility.
While it can not be denied that a section of BJP is vociferously communal. Their impact on decision-making in the previous NDA regime was minimal. The communal forces were held in check by the fragile diversity within NDA. And the political combine functioned very well as a potent decision-making team upholding secular law.
There is no reason to believe that NDA, if it comes to power, shall also prove to be above board per secular law and provide a major thrust to India's economic and strategic development.
Re: risking credibility
by floatsam on May 12, 2009 06:33 AM
There is no reason to believe that NDA, if it comes to power, shall not prove to be aboveboard per secular law and provide a major thrust to India's economic and strategic development.
Re: Re: risking credibility
by floatsam on May 12, 2009 06:41 AM
If anything, MMS has disappointed the sentiments of those who expected him to respect the ethos of his mentor PVN, whom he once called as his political Guru. His personal endorsing of the dynasty and campaigning only with them and in almost complete exclusion from rest of his senior collegues is a serious damage to the INC itself for which he shall not be forgiven by the chimes of History.
Re: Re: Re: risking credibility
by floatsam on May 12, 2009 08:30 AM
Post Ludhiyana meet, may be MMS is trying to make a LuDhi Yaan (overturned aircraft) out of NDA while the coping response is likely to avoid any tumble and keep the loaded passenger (ludhi) craft safe and secure.
There is a report in TOI today that many so called Kandhamal victims in Orisa are still alive. Many names are imaginary. On the top of it, the list of victims submitted by Cuttuck Archbishop contains names of Swamy Laxmananand Saraswati and his associates, many RSS workers, etc. If that is also not enough, many victims in the pseudo-secular list of Archbishop contains those who died due to cronic illness. (It is normal that in a population of 10 lakh poeple, about 30-40 people die every month due to cronic illness. It is fraudant to include them as riot victims).
It appears that all kinds of frauds have been played by pseudo-secular brigade to defame Hunduism in general and RSS in particular, exaggerate the scale of riots, and even projecting Hindu victims as X'ian victims.
Congress is infected with muslms & christans. All christans are murdrers. Any thing good they do is only a bait. Christans, muslms, skhs & jews are similar. Christan prists bribe terrorsts like LTTE, maoists, sonia gandhi, rahul gandhi & other criminals to murdr non-christans. Ref.: myspace com/vidhu2
One of the oft repeated television advertisements by the Congress presents a man declaring — “Na main Hindu hoon, na main Mussalman, na Sikh, na Ishai, main ek Bhartiya hoon (neither am I a Hindu, nor a Muslim, nor a Sikh nor a Christian. I am an Indian).” Does this mean a religious Eendu, a devout Mos$lim, a pious $ikh or churchgoing Khristian cannot be a proud Indian too? Does it also mean that to be a true Indian you have to be an atheist or a man without religion? Why does the Congress think there is a difference between a true Indian and a religious Indian? In that case the red vermillion pastes that Mrs SG and Rahul publicly sport on their foreheads and Manmohan’s widely publicized visits to gurdwaras all efforts to fool the Indian public? Aren't all sickular persons hypocrites? Any further proofs required?
