1. BJP represents only communalists and brahminism.Fact: most hindus especially OBC's DO NOT vote for the BJP and hate them.
2. the topic is politics. but communalists do not have a clue about the difference between religion and politics.
3. keep your religion at home.nobody cares. why does it come into politics? this is not pakistan or saudi arabia.
4. Use of religion for politcal purposes is abohrrent and fraudulent.
5 the hindutva gang is the only major politcal faction in India that equates nationalism with communalism.
6. the hindutva gang is the only major poltical faction for whom communalism is a way of life and an ideology.
7. the hindutva gang is the only major poltical faction controlled by a militant organisation ,RSS.
8. the hindutva gang is the only major poltical faction that depends exclusively on communal mobilisation. The idea that people of a particular relgion should vote for a politcal party is irrational and dumb. Again this is not pakistan or saudi arabia.
9. There are better constructive activities in life than bigotry against muslims. Devote your energies to constructive purpiose.not be a nuisance to others, by promoting public hatred.
10. remember that RSS and hindu mahasabha are traitors who didn't participate in the freedom struggle.
11. the sangh chief hero, savarkar, begged the brtish for mercy.
12 a secular democracy is not a govt of the brahmins,by the brahmins,for the brahmins.
Is standing up for the rights of the deprived majority a commnual sin. or just talking for and any one community a secular thinking. Congress, SP, BSP, RLD, RJD ect always talks on behalf on a single community. the communists who should not be beleiving in god also talk for a certain community. now will some one define what is communal and what is secular.
Re: Who is communal
by sq kazmi on May 20, 2009 01:50 AM
Dear Mr khatri,
Please elaborate what is meant by 'Deprived' majority. We talk in generalities without giving thought.What are the deprivations the majority is suffering?
Re: Who is communal
by satya s on May 22, 2009 01:45 PM
where is it said that People of one religion should vote a for a politcal party, illiterate?
why should a politcal party in a democracy speak for one community?
what about tax laws,education,health,infratstructure,foreign policy etc ? That is REAL politics.
not a delusion of "speaking for one community". Get over your ignorance and your narrow minded view.
this is a secular demoracy. india does not follow the "religion=state" model of countries like pakistan and saudi arabia.
people come together based on shared interests,values,ideology regardless of relgion,caste etc . to infer that people of a relgion will have shared interets is extremely dumb and uneducated
for all your delusions about "majority community",the sangh and its communalist supporters are a group which come together based on a shared ideology of communalism.that's all you bigoted lot are.
your "majority community" does not exist in reality ,deluded f00l.its only fantasy
Re: Who is communal
by Manikantan on May 23, 2009 03:27 PM
Communal is one who exploit the insecuredness of a community for their own benefit like the BJP. Mr Satender, there are only handful of issues waht BJP is talking. There is whole lot of Aberration in indian system. Congress has exploited the muslims for a very long time, like wise BJP will do to the HINDUS. Let me assure you that BJP will do the least to the HINDUS. The real bigot out of all these parties is the LEFT who are totally communal, where in Congress and BJp are half communal. So it is better to judge a party in terms of performance on economic and social front.
Let us not get carried away by the 2009 election results and read too much in it. This simply was a vote against the obstacles of progress (namely, the Left and similar regional parties), with the Congress turning out to be the bigger beneficiary as the BJP hardly has a strong presence in many of the states that were earlier dominated by the commies or other regionals.
BJP is secular, Congress is a political crook: Nowhere in its electoral posturing has the BJP demonstrated the kind of bias for or against any community as the Congress's Manmohan Singh did when he declared that Muslims had the first right on all of India's resources.
Given the Congress party's soiled track record over the past 60 years -- Bhindarawale's rise, a culture of sycophancy and political corruption, negligence of national infrastrucure (education, health, the list is long), fuelling insurgencies for political objectives in Assam and elsewhere, uncontrolled Naxalism -- it is foolish to suggest that the Congress is inclusive or even progressive.
Re: UPA gained mainly from Left, 3rd-4th front. NDA remains a for
by kaymos on May 22, 2009 01:57 PM
NDA ,A force ? JOKE OF THE YEAR 2009, Congress gain is not because of weak third or forth front but because of BJP's failure during its tenure. A Complete rout at Delhi ,Punjab,Andhra Pradesh and near complete rout in Rajashtan , Maharashtra and a dismal performance in Gujrat and Madhya Pradesh which was considered to be its strong holds .The only saving grace was Karnataka ( People of Karnataka would soon see the real face of BJP and would dump them as they did in Delhi ). Im quite optimist about BJP returning to the numbers it had in 1984 soon perhaps by 2018 if not 2014. Moreover what is interesting to see in news is Advani not willing to accept the post of leader of opposition .This clearly reflects that he is not interested in helping the people, He wants power .No power no Job. Its time for Mr.Advani to go back and undo the damage he has doneto the secular fabric of the country in his quest for power.
Re: UPA gained mainly from Left, 3rd-4th front. NDA remains a for
by Manikantan on May 23, 2009 03:33 PM
Manmohan is right. That is the way a gentle man behaves. unlike the idiotic so called the Upper caste of India had all along the first right on the resources and continue to have. Still the mindset persists. That is the root cause of Manmohan saying so.it would be foolish to be against someone doing good for the underprivileged.
Rahul(married to christian foreigner) has no locus-standi to rule India. That is why, he does not dare to come forward to take on roles in Indian political field. He knows that the partriotics would kill him & his family soon,if he does. Alas,We pity Indian people.They,without thinking about the future,had selected Sonia Congress as the single largest party.Indian Hindus have become spinelss&lack in self-respect&self-prestige for their own country.Sonia cunningly keep MMS as armour in front of her&has been doing all activities against the Holy-Indian country(especially against Majority Hindus) & no surprise if India will become Minorities turn to Majorities and Majority Hindus turn to Minorities,if the same cunning plans of Sonia & her christian son Rahul(he again married to a foreign girl) & her christian daughter Priyanka(she is married to foreigner Christian Robert) are allowed to continue. By keeping NDA out,the Indians had done enough damage for nation&themselves for long term.At least,from now on,Mayawati of UP/Biju of Orissa and BJP should forget their past differences and make a permanent alignment with NDA again. In T Nadu,AIADMK should form non-lasting alliance with Vijaikanth's DMDK. Just because KK wins this election, it does not mean he is good. He favoured only his family always. He had done enough “Droham”(ditched) to Srilankan tamils by his cowardly act so far which no other Politicians could do. MK only wants his family members in power to Make huge money.
Indian politician speaks to one of his slave, another slum dog, i wonder why elections are held, we always win, questions are standard and our response is also standard.
Their are no roads- We are Secular and BJP is communal
Population is 116 crore, it will be soon 150 crore-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP is communal
No quality of life, people want to eat other people, honesty , integrity, compassion, culture all exits in Amar Chitra Katha stories now-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP is communal
Well air is no dirty, no water, no system, so much of corruption, no jobs, people are doing slavery-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP Is communal
Common citizen is suffering, is paying taxes for what, atrocities by police, no healthcare, look at government hospitals-Hey we are SECULAR and BJP is communal
Terrorists are attacking, Taliban is taking over, they will make Indian just like Pakistan-Hey stop all this, remember we are SECULAR and BJP is communal.
Due to population Sir no Food to eat even-I already have US citizenship, keep playing on this tape recorder, yes Sir "We are SECULAR and BJP Is communal"
Lalu is corrupt or not? Mulayam is corrupt or not? Mayawati is corrupt or not? Pawar is corrupt or not? Karunanidhi is corrupt or not Devagowda is corrupt or not? Paswan is corrupt or not? Jaylalita is corrupt or not? But all are secular...They hates with communal party. They want only money by making fool to us.
Re: Do corruption in shadow of secular
by kaymos on May 22, 2009 02:02 PM
Please add Bandaru Laxman , George Fernandes to the list . We have seen them demanding and accepting money is dollars :)
Re: Do corruption in shadow of secular
by Anushkha Majumdar on May 19, 2009 06:34 PM
Modi Currupt or not? Advani Currupt or not? Vasundhara raje Currupt or not? AlL this people are currupt and also Communal(Karela Neem Chadha!!!!!)
Re: Do corruption in shadow of secular
by Mirza Mohsin on May 16, 2009 04:11 AM
Mr. Ashok Mishra please inculde the names of Laxman Bangaru and others who were caught red handed.
When I was watching star news yesterday,Girija vyas in the programme was trying prove herself and her party as secular several times.Lalu yadav is also doing the same.But poor indians now confused about the meaning of secularism.CPM,CONGRESS,RJD alll parties define themselves as secular.But onething as UPA was born as secular with several leaders who are involved in scandals,corruption.Even Sonia speaks in public only if a written paper available for her describes herself as secular.So who is communual?those who are saying against terrorism and congress party.
Re: secular -a different meaning in indian politics by congress p
by Vishy on May 14, 2009 06:11 PM
Congie hypocrites pretend they are secular and fool the whole country, but they cannot fool all the people all the time.
Re: Re: secular -a different meaning in indian politics by congre
by Manikantan on May 23, 2009 03:40 PM
Even BJP can fool all the Hindus all the time. Time has come for reckoning
Re: secular -a different meaning in indian politics by congress p
by anil pillai on May 14, 2009 09:43 PM
You call me a liar,crazy,corrupt,selfish or anti-social but don't be Secular.That is the most dirtest word .A secular is who receives foreign money for conversion,terriorist activities and corruption.
Re: Re: secular -a different meaning in indian politics by congre
by azaad on May 20, 2009 05:22 PM
you are right friend. using foreign money for convert hindus to christian is calledd secularism. and it's communal when someone is shouting against the convertion, oppose the muslim terorism, oppose ramsetu. but it's secular, if persons like lalu and amar singh supports simi. it's secular persons like karunanidhi asking hindus where lord ram has completed his engenearing. it's secular, if manmohan singh saying that muslims have the first right on the property of india. but indians are not fool, they will teach the lesson to the so called seculars.
Re: secular -a different meaning in indian politics by congress p
by Mirza Mohsin on May 16, 2009 04:15 AM
Communal are those who support murderer Modi.
Re: Re: secular -a different meaning in indian politics by congre
by innovatrade on May 18, 2009 11:14 PM
you nasty fundamentalistic castrated freak, learn to co-exist as this is the only country where a freak like eyou can talk bad about the leader of the majority.Your religion wherever they are present doesnot know to co-exist! So shut your mouth and try to live in todays's world. Hindus are not your enemey, Another man mande religion is your enemey and both of you will fight and get eliminated!
Re: Re: Re: secular -a different meaning in indian politics by co
by Hits Ach on May 20, 2009 10:12 PM
Excately Mr Innovatrade.. In many countries people cannot talk bad about leader of the majority... But do you want India to be such a country.. Mirza Mohsin has as much right to talk as you do. Jai Hind.
Re: Re: Re: secular -a different meaning in indian politics by co
by Manikantan on May 23, 2009 03:43 PM
You are right that Muslims as a whole have not learned to Co - exist. But people like cunning modi are not making situation any better
Re: secular -a different meaning in indian politics by congress p
by Manikantan on May 23, 2009 03:39 PM
Wrong doings of congress does not mean BJP is any better. They are equally corrupt and incompetent. Only thing that can go for BJP is that so far they are more PRO Development. But Manmohan being in hot seat anyone hardly can match him anymore
Re: OLD PEOPLE
by anil pillai on May 14, 2009 09:47 PM
what is the problem with experience ? People usually (especially in business) get succeed after 50s.They utilize the experience they got on the way. People prefer old and experienced advocates ,managers,Chartered accountants..etc.
Re: OLD PEOPLE
by SUDHIR PATNAIK on May 13, 2009 06:02 PM
dear aakash, WHO IS MORE WORTHFUL? U OR YOUR FATHER??YOU DOG,NEVER KNOW HOW TO RESPECT OLDIES
Re: OLD PEOPLE
by Vishy on May 14, 2009 06:14 PM
Old people have experience,but young people without it will make a lot of blunders, which no country can afford.Rajiv gandhi made a lot of blunders.His son should do party work ,gain experience the hard way and then only he will be fit to be entrusted with leadership.
Re: OLD PEOPLE
by Roshanara on May 14, 2009 11:13 AM
What an inane and insipid reply. Only old and experienced people succeed in politics. Dear Aakash, Money can buy anything except experience. It seems you are one of those who don't respect parents or elders. Please grow up.
