Discussion Board

''Indian voter smarter than politician''


Total 4 messages Pages | 1
Observer
Kandhamal - Another big fraud by pseudo-seculars
by Observer on May 12, 2009 04:39 AM

There is a report in TOI today that many so called Kandhamal victims in Orisa are still alive. Many names are imaginary. On the top of it, the list of victims submitted by Cuttuck Archbishop contains names of Swamy Laxmananand Saraswati and his associates, many RSS workers, etc. If that is also not enough, many victims in the pseudo-secular list of Archbishop contains those who died due to cronic illness. (It is normal that in a population of 10 lakh poeple, about 30-40 people die every month due to cronic illness. It is fraudant to include them as riot victims).

It appears that all kinds of frauds have been played by pseudo-secular brigade to defame Hunduism in general and RSS in particular, exaggerate the scale of riots, and even projecting Hindu victims as X'ian victims.

Whether it is Gujrat, Kandhamal, or Mangalore, the truth is slowly coming out.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
harjit
yes thy r
by harjit on May 11, 2009 11:54 PM

yes indian voter is smarter but not all.since they r not all smart so their votes r also going in vain.i believe only those who have passed 12 grade shuld have right to vote or stand for elections.this is the only way to sort out the bad politics in india.because poor people having no knowlege just sell their votes and they do not have to do anything with who they t voting to

    Forward  |  Report abuse
New York
You can RULE India for $350 million and with the support of Media
by New York on May 11, 2009 11:21 PM

* Total voters = 700 million
* Those who vote = 350 million
* Votes needed to win = 350 million

Since as per BBC, 80% Indians live on 20 rupees a day, you can BUY or BRIBE a vote for $2.

tr . im/jeHj


    Forward  |  Report abuse
kedem kemorah
Fooling the voter isnt easy
by kedem kemorah on May 11, 2009 11:07 PM

One of the oft repeated television advertisements by the Congress presents a man declaring — “Na main Hindu hoon, na main Mussalman, na Sikh, na Ishai, main ek Bhartiya hoon (neither am I a Hindu, nor a Muslim, nor a Sikh nor a Christian. I am an Indian).” Does this mean a religious Eendu, a devout Mos$lim, a pious $ikh or churchgoing Khristian cannot be a proud Indian too? Does it also mean that to be a true Indian you have to be an atheist or a man without religion? Why does the Congress think there is a difference between a true Indian and a religious Indian? In that case the red vermillion pastes that Mrs SG and Rahul publicly sport on their foreheads and Manmohan’s widely publicized visits to gurdwaras all efforts to fool the Indian public? Aren't all sickular persons hypocrites? Any further proofs required?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 4 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message