Congress party is aligned with IUML (Indian Union Muslim League) in Kerala. Now is this secular politics becaues IUML is totaly communal with only muslim members.
Re: Aligning with IUML - Secular !
by Water on May 11, 2009 12:07 PM
Bjpn Bathia Muslim league is a Secular party, if you don't have the knowledge about league just go and read the ideology, there is nothing wrong with aligning with this party. Muslim league is a partner of congress since decades not new one.
Re: Re: Aligning with IUML - Secular !
by jaapaal maatre on May 11, 2009 04:32 PM
u must be an illegal byproduct of IUML, thats why IUML has bcome more secular than BJP for you.
Re: Re: Aligning with IUML - Secular !
by jaapaal maatre on May 11, 2009 04:31 PM
u must be an illegal byproduct of IUML, thats why IUML has bcome more secular than BJP for you.
Re: Re: Re: Aligning with IUML - Secular !
by adrshkan on May 11, 2009 01:58 PM
As I said Buddy If a Hindu chants Jai Shri Ram he'll be branded as Communal....
Every Muslim says Masha Allah, there are secular so they can chant as many time as they wants...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Aligning with IUML - Secular !
by jaapaal maatre on May 11, 2009 04:27 PM
forget abt jai shri ram, u wil be branded communal even if u chant "Vande mataram". shame on them! they hold their religion above our mother india.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Aligning with IUML - Secular !
by jaapaal maatre on May 11, 2009 04:26 PM
forget abt jai shri ram, u wil be branded communal even if u chant "Vande mataram". shame on them! they hold their religion above our mother india.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Aligning with IUML - Secular !
by jaapaal maatre on May 11, 2009 04:29 PM
forget abt "jai shree ram" pal, they consider chanting even "vande mataram" as communal and an insult to 1s1am. so mother india is below their religion in their list of priorities.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Aligning with IUML - Secular !
by haris p on May 23, 2009 07:02 PM
IUML is not a communal party. In Kerala U. C. Raman is one of IUML MLA.
As stated by Mr.D.Singh, the interest of the party are above the National interest. The parties which came together were once formed opposing Congress and later in their personal interest they buried the hatchet and came under one umbrella to form UPA. These thing are inevitable in politics as there are no permanent foes or friends in politics. If Congress in secular why is it depending on the vote bank politics? Why can't it ban the parties formed with their minority symbol/name? Why can't there be minimum educational qualification, maximum number of terms and a retirement age to career politicians? Why it could not bring in good educational policy, health care and development in infrastructure during its rule for a major portion of the independent India?
Congress and BJP-both are fools, they are insulting voters wish, Both MPs are elected in a democratic manner, they must unite and leave the controversial issues and work for development of India instead of their petty gains, they have no right to joke with the voters.
Great to know that Digwijayji. I am sure you have the permission from the "Nawabsaab" as well as "Bibiji" before you said this.
As a matter of fact, Congress must not join hands even with the congressmen except from "The family". When you have the "Prince Harming" why do they need anyone else?
Congress must immeditely appoint some other "Ghulam" as the spokesman to replace Moily. What about Shivraj Patil? or better still Jagdish Tytler?
It may save the Prince and the PM by proxy of India facing the hurt English Langauage Media on 16 th.
This is just ridiculous. If BJP is supporting hindu organizations it is secular, even if Cong supports the muslim league and muslim communal parties, it is secularism. What a joke
