Re: Blasts will continue as indian lives are cheap for congees
by Fluffy Kumar on May 12, 2009 07:51 AM
Great points- but what brings results is a grass root movement to kick these politicians out. Giving 150 crores to Porkistan1 is the worst thing to do, when Indian farmers are killing themselves for lack of money. What a crying shame. Time to take control- anarchy is better than this pseudo-democracy by congress.
One of the oft repeated television advertisements by the Congress presents a man declaring — “Na main Hindu hoon, na main Mussalman, na Sikh, na Ishai, main ek Bhartiya hoon (neither am I a Hindu, nor a Muslim, nor a Sikh nor a Christian. I am an Indian).” Does this mean a religious Eendu, a devout Mos$lim, a pious $ikh or churchgoing Khristian cannot be a proud Indian too? Does it also mean that to be a true Indian you have to be an atheist or a man without religion? Why does the Congress think there is a difference between a true Indian and a religious Indian? In that case the red vermillion pastes that Mrs SG and Rahul publicly sport on their foreheads and Manmohan’s widely publicized visits to gurdwaras all efforts to fool the Indian public? Aren't all sickular persons hypocrites?
Re: Who is a true Indian?
by David Chen on May 10, 2009 01:39 AM
In USA- The president must hold a bible and thump it publicly to get elected, even though idiots in USA tout the "separation of church and State". In India, only muzlims and saitan1 xtains1 can openly go about with their religion1 on their heads. If Hindus1 adron a bindhi on their forehead, or read Gita, it is bad!WTF!
One of the oft repeated television advertisements by the Congress presents a man declaring — “Na main Hindu hoon, na main Mussalman, na Sikh, na Ishai, main ek Bhartiya hoon (neither am I a Hindu, nor a Muslim, nor a Sikh nor a Christian. I am an Indian).” Does this mean a religious Eendu, a devout Mos$lim, a pious $ikh or churchgoing Khristian cannot be a proud Indian too? Does it also mean that to be a true Indian you have to be an atheist or a man without religion? Why does the Congress think there is a difference between a true Indian and a religious Indian? In that case the red vermillion pastes that Mrs SG and Rahul publicly sport on their foreheads and Manmohan’s widely publicized visits to gurdwaras all efforts to fool the Indian public? Aren't all sickular persons hypocrites?
Re: Madams- Please define a true Indian
by David Chen on May 09, 2009 09:09 PM
Sick slogans, for sickular people only. Release our Hindu111 tem ples111 from govt. control. the muzlims and xtain saitans1 have full autonpmy. What BS
Congress is infected with muslms & chrstans. All chrstans are murdrers. Any thing good they do is only a bait. Chrstans, muslms, skhs & jws are similar. Chrstan prists bibe terrorsts like LTTE, maoists & naxals to murdr non-chrstans, esp. Hindus, buddhsts & communsts. Ref.: myspace com/vidhu2
Re: Muslms & chrstans are terrorsts
by Fluffy Kumar on May 10, 2009 11:36 PM
Infestation with F head xtains is more appropriate word to use. I am so happy in Italy, despite the Pope's preachings, the population is drastically going down, event hough it is a F Catholic land who are told to have billion kids each! Who is moving in? The worshippers of another TRUE GOd- praise be to Allah. Just deserts served, converted rice bags. See popeland being transformed into Saikhdom soon.
Re: D formidable president of india
by David Chen on May 10, 2009 01:40 AM
Dr. Kalam was a respected president, this lady is terrible, what are her qualifications?
