Discussion Board

Uma roots for Advani in Aligarh


Total 139 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
New York
Truth
by New York on May 05, 2009 04:30 PM

* To maintain social harmony and national integrity of India a WIDOW denounces Prime Minister position.
* To become Prime Minister of India a TERRORIST covertly demolishes masjids, temples and burns churches.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ramesh Anand
et tu Brute!
by Ramesh Anand on May 05, 2009 04:06 PM

It really surprise we Indians that people for very absurd reasons take shelter of 'muslim' status to grind their own axe and in turn tarnish the image of even those Muslims who are great patriots and not the traitors.See Azruddin the ex cricket captain.What did he say when caught for fixing matches?.Now this guy Sanjay Datt defaming the great Indian Lady Nargis who did not treat herself as Muslim or any thing but Indian and without any hitch married Sanjays Great father Sunil Datt.Sanj should shirk himself off the influence of his Maamaa Jees to enjoy his normal life.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ramesh Anand
et tu Brute!
by Ramesh Anand on May 05, 2009 04:05 PM

It really surprise we Indians that people for very absurd reasons take shelter of 'muslim' status to grind their own axe and in turn tarnish the image of even those Muslims who are great patriots and not the traitors.See Azruddin the ex cricket captain.What did he say when caught for fixing matches?.Now this guy Sanjay Datt defaming the great Indian Lady Nargis who did not treat herself as Muslim or any thing but Indian and without any hitch married Sanjays Great father Sunil Datt.Sanj should shirk himself off the influence of his Maamaa Jees to enjoy his normal life.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
New York
Truth
by New York on May 05, 2009 12:14 PM

All living humans mtDNA is derived from a single woman.
tr . im/kvhm

    Forward  |  Report abuse
TheBestMan InAll
PV Got it Done. Hats Off
by TheBestMan InAll on May 05, 2009 10:50 AM  | Hide replies



I would commend the PVN Rao's Govt for getting the Babri Demolition done thru special Agents.


Hats off to PVN Rao.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ramesh Anand
Re: PV Got it Done. Hats Off
by Ramesh Anand on May 05, 2009 04:11 PM
No doubt he was the Best Prime Minister India ever had. Not for above reasons alone.He was well wisher of India ,a patriot though and through,sharp headed and impressive gait. He was Chanakya of our age. Our humble respects to Sh Narsinha Rao

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Gowtham N
demolotion
by Gowtham N on May 05, 2009 09:57 AM  | Hide replies

What is the use of masj1d?, it was a graveyard of person who demolished the temple removing his grave is small thing but constructing a temple is essential thing.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
TheBestMan InAll
Re: demolotion
by TheBestMan InAll on May 05, 2009 10:49 AM


In True Sanathana Dharma, There were No Temples.

Ayodhya Temple was built just around a 1500 years ago or less.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Gowtham N
monument
by Gowtham N on May 05, 2009 09:55 AM

Is babri a monument of 16th century?, it was a graveyard of a dead person. It was not used for any thing else. Ayodhya is ram birth place and every hindus respect Ram. Any party coming to power should build the temple in Ayodhya, the Archeological survey committee inspected the site and declared that there was a big temple complex. Yet the report is not made public, refer to RTI for details.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
virat v
whatever it may b
by virat v on May 05, 2009 12:14 AM  | Hide replies

whatever it may b
babri was not worth maintaining. it was not used for namaz. it was a disputed site. n there r so many sites which hv been dem * oli*shed like temples.
so no need to cry for this unused mas*jid. if u cry then cry for all the temples demolished prior to that.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Aditya
Re: whatever it may b
by Aditya on May 05, 2009 12:22 AM
I agree... but if a unused or unwanted structure is demolished (temple building etc etc ) then due process is followed. You cannot have a ad hoc decision but some group of people to demolish certain "unwanted buildings" ... there is something thats legal and somethigns that not legal... you may buy a house and not stay in it.. and it may be unused.. i am sure you will mind a lot if some 20 fellas thought it would be a good idea to demolish it as its not being used all that much anyways....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
virat v
whatever it may b
by virat v on May 05, 2009 12:12 AM

babri was not worth maintaining. it was not used for namaz. it was a disputed site. n there r so many sites which hv been demolished like hindu temples.
so no need to cry for this unused masjid. if u cry then cry for all the temples demolished prior to that.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Total 139 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message