Most Indians and some Supreme Court Judges and Parliament Members are CONFUSED or prejudiced.
Indian Parliament is SUPREME because they are ANSWERABLE and ACCOUNTABLE to 1,166,079,217 (July 2009 est.) Indian Citizens. Supreme Court is SECONDARY, because they are only ANSWERABLE to the LITIGANTS.
Democratic Nations have the following setup. PLAN - Parliament DO - Administration EXECUTES as per PLAN CHECK - Judiciary CORRECTS Administration (NOT Parliament) as per PLAN
* Supreme Court should NOT create/review/refine/rewrite any LAW. * Supreme Court should NOT solve your KASHMIR problem, * Supreme Court should NOT decide your INCOME TAX rates, * Supreme Court should NOT decide the CORRECT train fare rate in India.
Parliament decides the SALARIES of Supreme Court Judges. Supreme Court Judges do NOT decide the SALARIES of Parliament Members.
At present, RAM JETHMALANI and PRANAB MUKHERJEE in India are EXPERTS in interpreting the PRACTICAL applications of Indian Constitution.
All these ministers are showing & declaring their assets by affidavit. It's just an insult of the court & all general public. In Mumbai I think General Higher Middle class Person has an asset worth 50 lakhs to 1.5 crores. So all these ministers are declaring only that much ? how it is possible ? In 5 years term without any expenditure ( we very well know that all these ministers never pay electricity or telephone bills ), and assuming a minimum 10k salary per month, ( 10000 x 12 x 5 = 60,00,000 interest .. .. ? ) all these congress ministers are in power for more than 10 - 15 years in ministry so each should have minimum assets worth 2 crores, so why make us fools
Re: DO YOU THINK THE PUBLIC SHOULD BELEIVE THESE DECLARATION ?
by Hitlar Nazi on May 03, 2009 08:11 PM
Remember an affidavit submitted by Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, of Assets worth less than 5 crores, having their family in Prime ministership since 1947 for more than 50 years and she declares only crores instead of trilions ?