Discussion Board

Q&A with BJP leader Gopinath Munde


Total 190 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
nitin chaturvedi
BJP is not Congress which supports Nepotism
by nitin chaturvedi on Mar 27, 2009 12:21 PM  | Hide replies

I strongly support the decision of BJP in not fielding Mahajans for Lok Sabha Polls. Poonam Mahajan could be a good BJP worker but she has to work harder to get BJP ticket. Kirit Somaiyya who has been in the constituency for last 30 years and is serving people there is the most deserving candidating.
BJP as a party has and will always reward people who have workeed for the organization for years and who have ingrained the thoughts and ideology. They do not follow the Congress Nepotism where Son of deceased get tickets, for the guys who were working with investment banks in there NewYork offices. They win because they have kept people of there region under developed and people still think they are kings. I hope some day Indian People awake and think that they are in democracy and if a king dies the new king is not the deceased kings son.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
hmm
Re: BJP is not Congress which supports Nepotism
by hmm on Mar 27, 2009 01:11 PM
bjp cant be congress-
50years-5years

   Forward   |   Report abuse
shashi sharma
Re: BJP is not Congress which supports Nepotism
by shashi sharma on Mar 27, 2009 12:33 PM
Good Nitin ,
I am hapy to see that you have brought the case of nepotism in congress and claimed that BJP is clean . Let me quote a few examples :
Himachal pradesh cms son is contesting lok sabha poll from a consituency .. well must be congres govt there .
Karnataka cms son contesting from shimoga ... again may be the CM belongs to cong .
There are many more ... the point here is :
What ive seen is that BJP has this mentality to claim that other parties indulge in dynasty politics and do precisely the same themselves , and at the same time call themselves holier than thou .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
amresh jha
Re: BJP is not Congress which supports Nepotism
by amresh jha on Mar 27, 2009 12:30 PM
I agree.Vote for BJP.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
gaurdain
Re: BJP is not Congress which supports Nepotism
by gaurdain on Mar 27, 2009 12:32 PM
its changing buddy not the same anymore!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
shashi sharma
Re: We have a lot of psuedo-secular politicians like Dalal Amar s
by shashi sharma on Mar 27, 2009 12:41 PM
Srini ,
well you seem to be hell bent on comparing India with Pak & Bangladesh which should not be the case with any patriot .
As to the points here are some thoughts .
Both Pak and Bangladesh are " Muslim republics " whereas India is NOT a Hindu republic . As to Indian muslim population , its 12 % today whihc has definitely increased from 10% in 47 . SO a growth but at this rate they will require close to 1000 years to reach close to HIndu population in the country .
Now on to second part of Kashmir , well most of the Hindus have definitely migrated out of Kashmir and this happened after 1990 and that was aperiod when both the state and the central govts were weak .And no govt has made any effort to get those hindu migrants back to kashmir ( Including so blatantly pro hindu party of BJP which ruled the nation for 6 years ) . So i wonder what your point is here ?? are you saying that we should vote for BJP again >? why ? If they couldnt do anything for Kashmiris in 6 years , how can i trust them to do so in the next 5 ??


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
South Indian
Re: How to become a leader in BJP
by South Indian on Mar 27, 2009 12:13 PM
This is the only quality you need to have if you wanna be a leader in BJP. It doesnt matter whatever other qualities you have or not... Just be a hate monger.. be a a bajrangi...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
B Kumar
Re: How to become a leader in BJP
by B Kumar on Mar 27, 2009 12:35 PM
You mean Tongadia, Pramod Muthalik, Raj Thakeray, Jagdish Tytler, Sajjan Singh are all BJP leaders and have fought elections on its ticket ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Siachen
It should not be in the inheritance...
by Siachen on Mar 27, 2009 12:10 PM

People of India is fed-up with Bhai-Bhatijawad in the ticket distribution. Everyone whosoever is being considered for contesting election should be scanned for his and his immediate families' antecedence. When Sahib Singh Verma was the CM of Delhi, his nephews were reportedly directly indulged in nefarious and anti-social activities. Mahajan's son is also not lagging behind.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
bravo don
just think over it.....
by bravo don on Mar 27, 2009 12:08 PM  | Hide replies

If you want to judge how good is the latest model of the “Mercedes” car and a
person who does not know how to drive sits at the steering wheel and bangs up
the car, who will you blame? The car or the driver? But naturally, the driver. To
analyze how good the car is, a person should not look at the driver but see the
ability and features of the car. How fast is it, what is its average fuel
consumption, what are the safety measures, etc. Even if I agree for the sake of
argument that the Muslims are bad, we can’t judge Islam by its followers? If you
want to judge how good Islam is then judge it according to its authentic sources,
i.e. the Glorious Qur’an and the Sahih Hadith.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
South Indian
Who released Maulana Mazood???
by South Indian on Mar 27, 2009 12:05 PM  | Hide replies

Dr. Singh or Advani????
Who is weak???? So dont talk non-sense!!!
Dr.Singh didnt let even one to escape from Mumbai!! All were shot.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
nisha
Re: Who released Maulana Mazood???
by nisha on Mar 27, 2009 12:35 PM
lets get to the begning---- rubia sayeed

   Forward   |   Report abuse
South Indian
Re: Re: Who released Maulana Mazood???
by South Indian on Mar 27, 2009 12:38 PM
Rubia sayed was BJP allie then... the VP singh govt... BJP was part of it.. so it is BJP decision...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
dead terrorist
Re: Who released Maulana Mazood???
by dead terrorist on Mar 27, 2009 12:36 PM
Kandahar was a hostile territory unlike Mumbai!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ninja Kirgi
Re: Who released Maulana Mazood???
by Ninja Kirgi on Mar 27, 2009 12:08 PM
Sure Dr Singh didn't bother about Indians getting killed. And wasn't it Madam and Dada alongwith commies and Maulana Singh who demanded that Masood be released to secure the passengers?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
South Indian
Re: Re: Who released Maulana Mazood???
by South Indian on Mar 27, 2009 12:09 PM
dont be joker!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
amresh jha
Re: Re: Re: Who released Maulana Mazood???
by amresh jha on Mar 27, 2009 12:27 PM
You south India joker.Why during Kandahar Hijack congress refused to take a single point stand?There are several times more terrorist attack on our country during past five years of congress rule.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
South Indian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Who released Maulana Mazood???
by South Indian on Mar 27, 2009 12:41 PM
even when the parliament was attacked, the congress stood by the govt then instead of scoring political points over it... congress is responsible party.. how you deal with the situation is govts job.. if the govt is weak then minister go escort to terrorists..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
dead terrorist
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Who released Maulana Mazood???
by dead terrorist on Mar 27, 2009 12:49 PM
The Congress Government however completely mishandled the Mumbai attack right from yhe begining!!!
They allowed the "sinister" media to cover the operation live resulting in so many casualties!!!

Forward   |   Report abuse
dead terrorist
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Who released Maulana Mazood???
by dead terrorist on Mar 27, 2009 12:46 PM
Life of almost all the hostages were saved!!

Forward   |   Report abuse
silk
rehabilitation!!
by silk on Mar 27, 2009 12:02 PM  | Hide replies

How many shares of Reliance Communication does the Mahajans own? 360 million shares of face value Re.1/- was allotted at par to the Mahajans when the company was in the Mukesh fold for obvious reasons and there has been no enquiry by the UPA government; wonder why!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
dead terrorist
Re: rehabilitation!!
by dead terrorist on Mar 27, 2009 12:05 PM
Where has all the money received in BOFORSE kickback deal gone?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
dead terrorist
Re: Re: rehabilitation!!
by dead terrorist on Mar 27, 2009 12:07 PM
Corruption charges in cases like Mudgal case (1951), Mundra deals (1957-58), Malaviya-Sirajuddin scandal (1963), and Pratap Singh Kairon case (1963) were levelled against the Congress ministers and Chief Ministers but no Chief Minister resigned

   Forward   |   Report abuse
dead terrorist
Re: Re: Re: rehabilitation!!
by dead terrorist on Mar 27, 2009 12:09 PM
Nehru had very high tolerance of corruption among his ministers !!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
dead terrorist
Re: Re: Re: Re: rehabilitation!!
by dead terrorist on Mar 27, 2009 12:16 PM
Mahatma Gandhisaid in May 1939
"I would go to the length of giving the whole congress a decent burial, rather than put up with the corruption that is rampant." ------


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bhajiya
Re: rehabilitation!!
by Bhajiya on Mar 27, 2009 12:04 PM
VOTE FOR CHANGE

VOTE MNS

   Forward   |   Report abuse
gaurdain
Re: rehabilitation!!
by gaurdain on Mar 27, 2009 12:04 PM
they got there share!!!!!!!!do i have to tell u that?????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
dead terrorist
Re: rehabilitation!!
by dead terrorist on Mar 27, 2009 12:07 PM
The history of corruption in post-Independence India starts with the Jeep scandal in 1948, when a transaction concerning purchase of jeeps for the army needed for Kashmir operation was entered into by V.K.Krishna Menon

   Forward   |   Report abuse
dead terrorist
Re: Re: rehabilitation!!
by dead terrorist on Mar 27, 2009 12:10 PM
Narsimha Rao was the first Prime Minister being prosecuted in corruption charges. Cases like Rs.2500 crore -Airbus A-320 deal with France involving kickback (1990), Harshad Mehta security scam (1992), Gold Star Steel and Alloys controversy (1992), JMM bribery case, Hawala scam of Rs. 65 crore and Urea scam (1996) also came up during the period of Narsimha Rao Government.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
silk
Re: Re: Re: rehabilitation!!
by silk on Mar 27, 2009 12:18 PM
Even at today's battered down prices, 360 million Reliance Communication shares are worth Rs.5400 million!! And it was worth 5 times as much in December 2007

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 190 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message