Are Hindoos not capable of defending themselves? if not it shows that they r cowards??? How come sikh could defend a Hindoo?? If that was the case khalistan would not have been demanded as sikhs would have liked to remain united with India.
Re: Why should anyone defend Hindoos
by Ram Sharma on Mar 26, 2009 06:46 PM
U will hv to learn history to understand that there is hardly any difference between S*kh & H*ndu. They marry amongst both frequently.
Re: Why should anyone defend Hindoos
by Aviram Vijh on Mar 26, 2009 06:43 PM
sikhs were the sons from hindu mothers who were sent to fight...most families has a male member who was sikh...didn't mean it was a separate religion. Sikhism simply is a purified form of Hinduism. All the Sikh gurus were of Hindu Khatri descent.
Re: Why should anyone defend Hindoos
by Ram Sharma on Mar 26, 2009 06:45 PM
U must read history to understand it. Hindus donated their eldest son to the Guru to make him Sikh. Thus Hindus promoted Sikhism by giving their own sons to defend Hinduism from Musl*m invadors. One Guru sacrificed his head to Aur*ngjeb in Delhi for this purpose.
Re: Why should anyone defend Hindoos
by Subhash G on Mar 26, 2009 07:07 PM
Dear sir, Basically in those days, the elder son of Hindu family was given for protecteing Hindus. Sikh's is not diffrent religion. Before Sikhs and hindus had praposed marriages also. Sikhs are the protector's of Hindu religion. They are the crown for hindus. This politicions have divided the country and they wish to maintain that for vote bank. Who wants temples?? who is bothered about caste ?? this is only for politicians. Be human and thats it.
Re: lesson
by Subhash G on Mar 26, 2009 07:09 PM
Dear sir, Basically in those days, the elder son of Hindu family was given for protecteing Hindus. Sikh's is not diffrent religion. Before Sikhs and hindus had praposed marriages also. Sikhs are the protector's of Hindu religion. They are the crown for hindus. This politicions have divided the country and they wish to maintain that for vote bank. Who wants temples?? who is bothered about caste ?? this is only for politicians. Be human and thats it. If minorities join BJP then the total politics will collapse in India there will be no issue for any political party
I replied to Patriot's msg in single words 5 times. All were blocked. Why this irrelevant blocking? When a msg is not blocked, why just replying 'agreed' should b blocked?
Re: Why instant irrelevant blocking?
by Aviram Vijh on Mar 26, 2009 06:44 PM
or a anti muzlim msg ( i said the same thing with the correct spelling and u can see my msg is pending moderator review!!!)
If anybody finds such incidents, the person should lodge a complaint with police and not air it on TV. TV is the real culprit and their should be a law to curb it. If they have footage. Produce it in court and debar the person for life. But dont allow it to be telecasted. After telecast the bitterness stays but nothing happens to culprits.
Re: Congress massacred 5000 Sikhs
by Vishwamitra Singh on Mar 26, 2009 06:41 PM
They are brown angrez. They have slipped in the system which britishers created. Let us Change the system. So that no Congress survives.
Re: Re: Congress massacred 5000 Sikhs
by Orchid on Mar 26, 2009 06:57 PM
they are able to eat pure ghee because of congress. How you can expect them to leave the taste?
Re: Congress massacred 5000 Sikhs
by yugapurush on Mar 26, 2009 06:40 PM
difference varun spoke, congress did.. 1.465 Trillon of $ deposited in swiss account from india it is 2.5 times of indian economy
Re: Re: Congress massacred 5000 Sikhs
by kafir chronicles on Mar 26, 2009 06:50 PM
Joker, do you even know the GDP of India in 2008 estimate is $3.305 trillion (2008 est.) It was $1.237 trillion in 2007. Advice you to do the math. However, we cannot deny the Swiss bank numbers.
"I am proud of being a Sikh. Sikhism was founded to defend Hindus and there is hardly any difference between a Sikh and a Hindu," the estranged Nehru-Gandhi family member said.
THE MOST ABSURD STATEMENT I HAVE EVER COME ACROSS IN MY LIFE..
Re: congress is more communal than bjp
by Vidwan Singh on Mar 26, 2009 06:41 PM
Some of your observations are correct. Congress was responsible for starting & ending the pujab terrorism!
Re: congress is more communal than bjp
by utter nonsense on Mar 26, 2009 06:37 PM
No one should dare show disrespect for Congress(Italian). What if it's lead by fair skinned italian? You dark skinned people are born to be enslaved by fair skinned people. Indian history stands testimony to this fact. You should vote for Congress, and you are not supposed to even think about an alternative.
Jai Madamji Soniaji Gandhiji! jai Sirji Rahulji Gandhiji!
Re: Menka - you are great
by chandra kant on Mar 26, 2009 06:42 PM
Yes sikhs were formed to defend hinduism & it was never treated as the separate relogion or quam as is being asserted by the Akalis now.The mahants were performing the rights in gurudwaras but the Britishers formed the SGPC to make a divide between sikhs n hindus and it happened also.The Akalais r furthering this cuase by widening the rift
