Re: BJP dividing people on communal lines
by chanduji on Mar 24, 2009 02:33 PM
Congress and other mollabadi parties want to give another chunk of India to Mollaz. Kick Moallz and Mollabadis out of this universe and bring peace on Mother Earth.
Re: BJP dividing people on communal lines
by Sandeep Parwal on Mar 24, 2009 02:31 PM
Well said. Add Pakistan also. They never need development. give weapons to sangh parivaars and ask to do as taliban's do.
Re: Re: Re: mayawati or Lalu
by M B on Mar 24, 2009 02:31 PM
i could not get any cutomers for her as she has become old and famous in your neighbourhood.
Re: Re: shaikhhamid
by sarang joshi on Mar 24, 2009 02:38 PM
see thaths what irks us the most...today our tolerance has been treated as cowardice..I wish all the hindoos read you message and become brave...I wont mind india to become a hindoo rashtra..but i never wanted it bcoz of tolerance and not bcoz of cowardice
Re: Re: shaikhhamid
by shaikhhamid on Mar 24, 2009 02:33 PM
sarang its not the fault of xians its u guys who never treated ur brothers...u only divided ur religion in upper and lower caste system and bcoz of ur ill treatment they have beeen able to convert those poor lower caste ppls...
Re: Re: Re: shaikhhamid
by M B on Mar 24, 2009 02:47 PM
shaik donot preach what has been parroted to you in mosques. the conversion of poor to other religion is not illtreatment as it made to to be. Poor and gullible are coersed into other religion with lure of money and material benifits and false promise of so many things and you are alive example of this lure and alluremtn ask your older family members what they went through after conversion by decept.
Re: Re: Re: Re: shaikhhamid
by shaikhhamid on Mar 24, 2009 03:00 PM
mb for ur info i never went to any madrassa... and u r talking abt money and material benefits which the main reason for conversion then u r totally wrong is ur brothers r so weak in their faith that they leave their religion for some money and material benefits ???
then u shd think abt ur faith and religion's existence....
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: shaikhhamid
by M B on Mar 24, 2009 03:14 PM
shaikh - donot turn my question on me. I too asked you the same question if you can properly infer it. for what reason you ppl converted to izzlam from hinduism? you have no answer other than than saying the same sentences which have already told me. Its like asking some one how if you were not stong and intellignet how did you become victim of situation and circumstances ?
Re: Re: Re: shaikhhamid
by sarang joshi on Mar 24, 2009 02:37 PM
well i accept it...But the organisations like R S S are trying to unite hindoos...We find congress as the only hurdle in doing it
Re: Re: shaikhhamid
by Sandeep Parwal on Mar 24, 2009 02:27 PM
Who is giving Petroleum and technologies. Never use technologies invented by chr*isi*tans
Re: Re: Re: shaikhhamid
by sarang joshi on Mar 24, 2009 02:41 PM
it doesnt mean we have to convert to chr*isi*tans to use their technology..Did we ask them to become hindoo to use "zero"
Re: Re: shaikhhamid
by Sahara on Mar 24, 2009 02:34 PM
yes people who dream about converting darul.harb into darul.slam are defective pieces and should be quarantined
Re: shaikhhamid
by dineshk on Mar 24, 2009 02:26 PM
hindu rastra with 25% of moslems and chris... a rastra can be on a religion only when it has 100 percent like nepal or paki
Hate speeches have been witnessed in the past but the latest Varun's election speech is something simply unprecedented for its language. While Law should be allowed to take its lengthy course but can any EC worth its name chose not to act meanwhile as in this specific case ? Then every leader can replicate Varun and hide behind legal veil that will completely vitiate the election process. It is EC’s job after all to safeguard this very process. But the BJP seems to be deliberately creating confrontationists position on the whole issue of EC. Who knows what could BJP be up to after Gopalaswamy retires on 20th April and Navin Chawla takes over as the CEC ? More confrontation for sure and could be disastrous for our democratic institution. It is better that the UPA govt. pre-empts BJP move by graciously replacing Navin Chawla(he can resign) also on the 20th April with a new man. The two new ECs with the existing third EC as the new CEC may have better all round acceptability. Jyothi Basu, Yetchury, D. Raja, Karunanidhi, Lalu, Mulayam, Paswan etc, who have excellent rapport with both MMS & SONIA should prevail upon the duo to effect this change in EC in the National interest.This BJP-CONGRESS confrontation on EC is taking the country nowhere.
if bjp's intentions r good then they shd not worried abt mus lims and their protest...they shd implement it in first place after winning the elections....
Re: Re: Re: UCC
by Sahara on Mar 24, 2009 02:30 PM
thanx to internet the auqaat of your qaum and the ideology you follow is exposed...otherwise i just used to wonder why you guys are against india but now i know the reason
Re: Re: Re: Re: UCC
by shaikhhamid on Mar 24, 2009 03:06 PM
sarang just read the message of sahara...then reply
and if bjp govt comes and makes it compulsory mus lims will abide by the law of the land...
but my point is
is bjp honest in their election agenda ??? will they do whatever they r saying ??? i know congress and sp and other parties who appease mus lims r not the wel wishers of mus lims///but bjp is also not good for mus lims...
vote for KAA*ngi for polarizing the society. while the maj*ority com*munity work hard.the mi*nor*ity community comes up and gets ha*j subsidy and then will give them reservations while maj*ori*ty community works damn harder... probably teh next stop of kaa*ngi will be to give honeymoon package to mino*ri*ty community...
Pakistanis should be barred from voting in India. Pakistan is not allowing any other religion voters. Congress, CPM, SP and the mollabadi gheto is fighting to bring more Pakistanis in India.
Re: Voting r8s
by srinivasan mv on Mar 24, 2009 02:54 PM
If Pakistanis and Bangladeshis are not allowed to vote, then what political agenda do this Congress and so called Secular parties have?
