Madha Patkar was financed from overseas to see that no water reacheds Gujarat. This overpaid ator joined later probably on the premise that they will award his film with an award if he gave support.
Re: Medha Patkar was financed from overseas
by Anand Acharya on Apr 30, 2009 03:08 PM
true! I wrote similar things at 14:39 hours on this forum! These actors have no intellectual standards - no more than mere NAUTANKIs!
Can can any body inform me y do Hindoo hate RSS or any other Hindoo wing and love S!M! ?
According to me, If RSS and other Hindu wings doesnt exist today, these Muzl!ms in no time will turn India into !slam!c state, rape hindu woman, slaughter childrens and kill everyone.
U might think I am here to spread hatred, right? buut let me inform u about the facts of what musl!m have done to India in their 1000 years of ruling. check the history my dear freinds. Once MuzL!ms population gets majority they employ sharia law.
Checkout the history of our Sikh brothers. Mu$l!ms have tortured and killed many Sikh gurus. It were our Sikh brothers who have saved Hind00 from the Muzl!ms. Its nothing to do with hatred with Muzl!ms, all that matters is the facts and figures as this community has never been faithful to anybody. I would say, If RSS, Bajrang Dal, shivsena wouldnt have existed today, I believe uptil now all Hind00 would have been dead or converted and would have become next TALIBAN. Anyways our pippest PM has declared that Mu$l!ms have first right to nations treasury. If my thinking is wrong, please advice.
Re: I AGREE WITH THIS MESSAGE
by My way on Apr 30, 2009 03:30 PM
Agreed.. what happened to hindus in kashmir is the latest eg. can we a ever expect a hindu CM in J&K.
Re: I AGREE WITH THIS MESSAGE
by Traps on Apr 30, 2009 03:23 PM
"According to me, If RSS and other Hindu wings doesnt exist today, these Muzl!ms in no time will turn India into !slam!c state, rape hindu woman, slaughter childrens and kill everyone"
How did you reach this conslusion? Considering the fact that this is a serious allegation do you have anything to show as proof other than what happened hundreds of year before? I would not understand what happened centuries before because at that time even India did not exist.
Re: I AGREE WITH THIS MESSAGE
by Chirag on Apr 30, 2009 03:06 PM
Hi Rodricks,
If I believe you Hindoos hate RSS or any other Hindoo wing and love SIMI..Hindoos are traitors..(That is what you are saying, not me)
We dont need any RSS or any other wing..to defend ourselves..why are you undermining Hindoos strenght. Cowards like you need all these things, we have always fought battles on our own and will do so in future..They are just orgarnisation which are for welfare of society (and some times making money)..
Please remember India has been ruled by Muslims for around 500 years and by christians by around 150 years..If they cannot convert all the Hindoos..why it will happen now...Cowards like you get converted to save their own life and need some one to save them...
Re: Re: I AGREE WITH THIS MESSAGE
by Anand Acharya on Apr 30, 2009 03:14 PM
Chirag, You got agitated unnecessarily over Rodricks' comments. Basically, you & he saying the same thing. But you seem to be pretty biased towards anything other than Hindu (this is not a Hinduism, By The Way!) & not ready to fully interpret what Rodricks was trying to communicate! Braveness in losing to all those barbers from across the border from any side - we were fighting among ourselves when they attacked; let us accept it, we couldn't unite. Conversion is not documented; so don't make comments about what went 10-15 generations before you & me.
Re: Re: Re: I AGREE WITH THIS MESSAGE
by Chirag on Apr 30, 2009 03:22 PM
Thanks for interpretating things for me..I know I am a dumb ;).
People like Rodricks are here to spread hatred and divide India..These people always want to hide behind some one when something goes wrong.
I am not saying conversion dint happened at that time..but today 80% population of India is Hindoo that is proof that not all were converted...If that cannot happened in 700 years, where it will happen in next let say 50 or 100 years..That is what I was trying to say..Why making such hue and cry....
Re: Re: Re: Re: I AGREE WITH THIS MESSAGE
by Traps on Apr 30, 2009 03:26 PM
I agree with Chirag. The current political organisation are splitting the society on religious lines for petty gains. In that sense they are no different from the British. Its even worser... Because unlike the British these people are figthing against there on brothers...
Re: not weak
by Anand Acharya on Apr 30, 2009 03:17 PM
signing is not a sign of weakness - wonderful logic! Don't all prime ministers sign lot of such deals during their respective tenures? Is it not their job for this country? where is the strength parameter in this? You are too sweet, darling!
Why is an author so much bollywoodised over a single actor giving an opinion about another human being as compared to any one of us (the language : "...none other than..." sounds like we are reading a statement by eminent constitutional expert or eminent jurist Nani Palkhiwala)! Fine, he has an opinion - but it sounds as if it is being used to get some votes. 123 deal and constantly in fire-fighting mode rather than a pro-active mode will never ever make any prime minister STRONG enough by default. Any prime minister would have to do it as part of his job; is it not the truth? Will he not have a fear of losing his job otherwise? It is expected from a prime minister of a country like INDIA! And that too, being such a brilliant scholar himself. Mr. Amir Khan, where are honest people (for whom you are going to vote)? If he stays in Gujarat in the areas where there is water scarcity for about 1 full year (he is known to be a perfectionist, right?) and then form an opinion whether settling an entire Gujarat would be easy or few thousand adivasis in Madhya Pradesh for who he tried to assist Medha Patkar (the most stupid so-called social activist ever seen in India) - go & read some intellectual people's opinion about Medha Patkar and then join the party. Don't just join to get HIGH-LIGHTs on you, Mr. Amir Khan! Sitting in Mumbai; people form an opinion about Gujarat after listening to some stupid human being who just wants to be in lime-light at any cost as she has no work.
Re: Who is Amir Khan?
by sudeep sachin on Apr 30, 2009 03:01 PM
It's his opinion he did expressed, it's his choice any bloody begger like you cannot change that. He is not asking for High Light media knows and the people of the country knows what he is. therefore he is being highlighted. You are also trying to get highlighted by writing some thing rubbish in this forum.
Re: Who is Amir Khan?
by Faceless Indian on Apr 30, 2009 02:44 PM
Here comes a Baniya to defend Baniya Janata Party ( BJP ). these baniyas are the ones responsible for looting the country during the Congress rule ( License Raj ) and now that Cong under Dr. MMS has kicekd them out, they want a Baniya party to start their hoarding again. Keep these baniyas and their license raj out of power and save the country.
Re: Re: Who is Amir Khan?
by anmol m on Apr 30, 2009 02:48 PM
every individual has his opinion hence if amir has expressed his opinion fair enough, but that doesn't stop anybody from having a different opinion womanmohan singh right??? So grow up
Re: BEWARE BEWARE PEOPLE OF BJP
by Anand Acharya on Apr 30, 2009 02:53 PM
masjids? are you in Pakistan? Or in India? Which BJP leader has personally promised you to build a masjid for you? Try to use the analytical brain of yours - how many years did they rule? what special marks will you give to them? You will say that there were no riots anywhere? No police atrocities? Were minorities treated well - they looted their mindsets fully because they were never an educated mass! I am not sure kttp, whether you will ever understand the blind-folded-ness in a democracy by people who are never seeing a nation beyond a party. Democracy is not about loyalty by people, mind well!
Every major city in India has been attacked consistently over the last two years. Since 2004, 3850 Indians have died in Terror attacks in over 3000 incidents. Is the common Indian on the streets really safe ?
Did you know that on the day of the Mumbai train blasts, the Government gave Rs 150 crores for earthquake relief in Pakistan ? Last year our Govt. has given Rs 3000 crores (600 Million Dollars) to Afghanistan? This, when victims of terror in India have not yet got aid? Whats going on?
Re: why we dont need cong
by jacob jacob on Apr 30, 2009 02:36 PM
at the time of Congress ,, people from p0k will kill our people.. at the time of BJP ,, they themselves will kill the fellow beings .. i ll prefer the first
Re: Re: why we dont need cong
by anmol m on Apr 30, 2009 02:51 PM
can u update me on the sikh riots and the bhagalpur riots in Bihar and the Nellie killings in Assam, the thousands of hindus massacred in Kashmir, kindly grow out of your minority mentality, check how Christian militants kill hindus in the north eastern states
Re: Re: why we dont need cong
by Anand Acharya on Apr 30, 2009 02:56 PM
jacob jacob, please count both the items and you will realise that your figures are lousy! Your language sounds like a dialogue from a Manmohan Desai film!
