Re: Re: Reborn Sanjay gandhi
by Vidisha on Apr 23, 2009 07:02 PM
Are you crazy? Certain religions have made it their motto to increase population. As simple as that. They admit it themselves. No politician dares offend them.
DAL- 70 Rs from 20/kg Rice 25 from 5 Atta 25 from 5 chini 30 from 3
Share market 8000 from 21000 USD 51 from 35
Terror attack like Mumbai
Disparity in 6th pay commision with armed forces
All set to ruin Indian economy also by increasing FDI in banks and insurance,Thanks to CPM who stopped MMS
CAST BASE POLITICS ONLY APPEASEMENT OF MUSLIMS AT THE COST OF ALL OTHER RELEGION CENTIMENTS ALL INDIAN RESOURCE FOR MUSLIMS AS PER MMS ANOTHER KARGIL IN GUREZ
Re: according
by Jai on Apr 23, 2009 06:38 PM
@vinod vinod --TuJawabDE yar.. ISLAMIYONKA LUNDKYOkaatDETE hai?SUWARkeBACCHEhoKYA?JoBINA-lundkeABADI BADHRAHIHAI TUmhari???....lol
Re: according
by phukan barua on Apr 23, 2009 06:39 PM
the eve of the general election, Islamic fundamentalist Mullahs and Christian Bishops of various denominations have issued a directive for their followers to vote for candidates defending and promoting secularism. What is their directives mean? Do totalitarian Muslims and fundamentalist Christians believe in secularism? Calling Islamo fascists and Christian fundamentalists to vote for secularists should be instantly recognized as an oxymoron, analogous to claiming that fundamentalism is secularism. Islamic fundamentalists and hardcore Christians are against Hinduism, secularism, pluralism, spiritual practices and Hindu deity worship.The statement issued by Mullahs and Bishops are deceptive and it is meant for manipulation of phony Indian secularists. In India, secularism is used against tolerant, passive, and unorganized Hindus. Indian secularism is based on hatred against Hindus and it is for promoting dualistic, rigid, and totalitarian Islam and Christianity. Secularism in India is used for Islamic and Christian appeasement and to subjugate and discriminate Hindus. It is not based on religious neutrality or to promote universalism, pluralism or spiritual values. Indian secularism favors and promotes Muslims and Christians. It inhibits Hindu cultural and spiritual practices, ethical values and morality in all manners. For phony Indian secularists, fundamentalist Mullahs and sectarian Bishops are privileged. Indian secularism opposes the majority Hindus.
Re: according
by bc maheshwari on Apr 23, 2009 06:45 PM
mr vinod why are the so called brave pakistani converts to the arab faith not fighting a open war against the kafirs of india.why are they fighting like the coward founder of their faith who fled mecca to save himself in war.??
Re: according
by Vidisha on Apr 23, 2009 06:32 PM
Most of the Gujarat claims have already been proved false along with the pregnant women thingy. In fact most of the horrific stories were made up.
You should keep track of the latest developments instead of harping on old news which are proven false.
Re: according
by phukan barua on Apr 23, 2009 06:32 PM
The alleged oppression of minorities is the political bridgehead that modern evangelical organisations have entrenched in the public consciousness, relentlessly distorting its reality and using it ruthlessly to fuel discontent within India. By deliberately misrepresenting the Godhra communal riots as genocide, though both communities suffered, the media has gleefully incited Islamic terrorist attacks against Hindus and harsh international condemnation of India. As a corollary, the rise of the BJP inspired them to equate mundane nationalist aspirations with the oxymoron of Hindu extremism. Yet, there is resounding silence on the role of the minority community in providing succour to Islamic terrorism through vote bank politics and concealment from attention
Re: according
by Rationalist on Apr 23, 2009 06:28 PM
You are just parroting the story cooked by that bluff Teesta. BY the way I admire your bravery when 1000 people gathered to burn 50 karsevaks. What a ratio? 1:20. This proves that most of you guys are terrorists only waiting for a favourable situation to unleash your potential.
Re: according
by phukan barua on Apr 23, 2009 06:37 PM
the problem today is India happens to be one of the very few major countries in the world whose dominant media is controlled directly or indirectly by foreigners. The usurpation of control has actually been by Americans, much of it through surrogates of evangelical organisations that are in fact quasi-government agencies. In India, most English language media outlets, are, in effect, vying with each other to accelerate the fragmentation of India in consonance with Anglo-American goals.The alleged oppression of minorities is the political bridgehead that modern evangelical organisations have entrenched in the public consciousness, relentlessly distorting its reality and using it ruthlessly to fuel discontent within India. By deliberately misrepresenting the Godhra communal riots as genocide, though both communities suffered, the media has gleefully incited Islamic terrorist attacks against Hindus and harsh international condemnation of India. As a corollary, the rise of the BJP inspired them to equate a nationalist aspirations with the oxymoron of Hindu extremism. Yet, there is resounding silence on the role of the to Islamic terrorism through vote bank politics and concealment from attention
I fail to understand the code of conduct by Election Commission.
Is it wrong to speak against terrorists?
Is it wrong to speak against minorities, when the government practises minority appeasement, for example, communal budgeting of 15% exclusively for moslims and specially grooming 90 moslim-majority districts all over india?
Are elections not the time to discuss the events that happened during the last 5 years, including minority appeasement, terrorist attacks and so on?
How can these discussions be avoided just because they hurt the feelings of a section of people?
Their minority appeasement politics hurt the feelings of majority community. What about that? Should these not be discussed during elections, which is the perfect time to ask the people to ponder over these issues and vote?
It is time to say good bye to the stupid code of conduct of Election Commission.
Re: brave?
by Rationalist on Apr 23, 2009 06:24 PM
That was before 20th century when just brute, deception & determined gangsterism won. You do'nt have any chance in 21st century. This is the age of technology and Quraan is against it.
Re: brave?
by sujit kumar on Apr 23, 2009 06:24 PM
mr vinod mr vinod people like u are the coward who first converted to the religion of the invaders fearing the sword of the arabs. it is the present day hindus who had the courage to withstand the attrocities of the invaders to remain faithful to the religion of their ancestor. it is with the support of coward like u that the the invaders ruled a small part of india .it is people like u who are enslaved to the their arab masters.look how the coward converts of the pakistan which was part of india are surrendering before the arab formulated army called the taliban. it shows that corwadice run in the blood of these coward converts.the hindus of India have defeated the coward converts of pakistan in four wars.one lac pakistani solders surrendered befoe the kafir army of india.latest being the kargil war where they ran to america to save their skin. and they consider america as their biggest enemy
Re: brave?
by Vidisha on Apr 23, 2009 06:15 PM
When it comes to other religions, you dont like tolerance or violence. You are hanging midway with your opinions like some 50-50.
Re: Re: Re: brave?
by Vidisha on Apr 23, 2009 06:21 PM
And people who are supporting congress are supporting the murderers of sikhs, the killing of Tamils, the influx of bangladeshi refugees and the partition of India.
Re: Re: Re: brave?
by Pehelwan on Apr 23, 2009 06:32 PM
You guys keep killing your leaders by the dozen.If you have no other people to kill then you start killing your own people.But kill you must.Its not your fault. It is the stinking porki gene inside you.You guys missed a chance to set right your Genes.If Rajiv Gandhi had married Benazir then the subsequent generations would have been better human beings.
Re: brave?
by Pehelwan on Apr 23, 2009 06:19 PM
Enjoy while you can.You guys are on the brink of extinction.Pakistan is going to vanish with all its filth.
Re: code of conduct
by Ajay Kanwar on Apr 23, 2009 06:11 PM
Gopalaswami who took action against varun is retired now and you can go to his house try to know everything there only. mayavati who slapped NSA on Varun, is again roaring and nobody in BJP has guts to oppose her
