Sikhs getting slaughered in thousands = A MISTAKE. Hindus getting killed in Kashmir = Political problem. Muslims getting killed by a few hundred = Holocaust. Poor protestors getting shot in WB under Left Govt = Misunderstanding.
Banning Parzania in Gujarat = Communal. Banning Da Vinci Code and Jo Bole So Nihaal = Secular.
Kargil Attack = Government failure. Chinese invasion in 1962 = Unfortunate betrayal.
Reservations in every school and college on caste lines = Secular. Reservations in Minority institutions = Communal.
Fake encounters in Gujarat [Sohrabuddin] = BJP Communalism. Fake encounters under Cong-NCP in Maharashtra [Khwaja Younus] = Police atrocity.
Talking about Hindus and Hinduism appeasment = Communal. Talking about Muslims and Islam = Secular.
BJP freeing 3 terrorists to save 100 Indian hostages = Shameful Congress freeing 4 militants to save just a life of one daughter of I Home minister in Kashmir [Rubina Sayed] = Natural Political dilemma.
Attack on Parliament = BJP ineptitude. Not hanging Afzal Guru the mastermind despite Supreme Court orders = Humanity and Political dilemma.
BJP questioning Islam = Communal. Congress questioning Lord Ramas existance = Clerical Error.
Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by Rama Mani on Apr 22, 2009 07:10 PM
Partition of naion 47 and genocide of Hindus later=essential for secularism in India!
Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by ravula reddy on Apr 22, 2009 07:00 PM
Well said Gomateswara.
This is very sensitive issue and you should look with an open mind and without any bios. When ever any person talks about the Hindus and Hindu values they are treated as evil or ill to the society. I give an example. When some students at some Art University draw some nude picture of Hindu gods people said that they expressed their own views and they have right. This incident took place in India. Most of the political parties (congress, RJD, etc) supported them. There was some cartoon published on Proft. Mohmed in a Demark news paper. Muslims in were protesting and the same political parties (Congress, RJD, etc) supported Muslims and condemned the act. This incident did not take place in India still political parties supported the protesters. Why people take Hindus for granted. Don’t we have feeling or don’t we have rights to support of spiritual values.
Congress party talk about Best Bakery case where 8 Muslims were burnt alive in Gujarat why they ignore 200 Hindus who were burnt alive by Muslims mob.
Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by ravula reddy on Apr 22, 2009 07:01 PM
Well said Gomateswara.
This is very sensitive issue and you should look with an open mind and without any bios. When ever any person talks about the Hindus and Hindu values they are treated as evil or ill to the society. I give an example. When some students at some Art University draw some nude picture of Hindu gods people said that they expressed their own views and they have right. This incident took place in India. Most of the political parties (congress, RJD, etc) supported them. There was some cartoon published on Proft. Mohmed in a Demark news paper. Muslims in were protesting and the same political parties (Congress, RJD, etc) supported Muslims and condemned the act. This incident did not take place in India still political parties supported the protesters. Why people take Hindus for granted. Don’t we have feeling or don’t we have rights to support of spiritual values.
Congress party talk about Best Bakery case where 8 Muslims were burnt alive in Gujarat why they ignore 200 Hindus who were burnt alive by Muslims mob.
Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by Rama Mani on Apr 22, 2009 07:09 PM
Partition of naion 47 and genocide of Hindus later=essential for secularism in India!
Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by Rama Mani on Apr 22, 2009 07:08 PM
Partition of naion 47 and genocide of Hindus later=essential for secularism in India!
Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by ravula reddy on Apr 22, 2009 07:04 PM
Well said Gomateswara.
This is very sensitive issue and you should look with an open mind and without any bios. When ever any person talks about the Hindus and Hindu values they are treated as evil or ill to the society. I give an example. When some students at some Art University draw some nude picture of Hindu gods people said that they expressed their own views and they have right. This incident took place in India. Most of the political parties (congress, RJD, etc) supported them. There was some cartoon published on Proft. Mohmed in a Demark news paper. Muslims in were protesting and the same political parties (Congress, RJD, etc) supported Muslims and condemned the act. This incident did not take place in India still political parties supported the protesters. Why people take Hindus for granted. Don’t we have feeling or don’t we have rights to support of spiritual values.
Congress party talk about Best Bakery case where 8 Muslims were burnt alive in Gujarat why they ignore 200 Hindus who were burnt alive by Muslims mob.
Re: BAPUJI ASHRAM
by ad na on Apr 22, 2009 06:49 PM
So should Varun ad Priyanka who are hugging the poor in Amethi but soon will be seen celebrating in VEgas once they win the elections.
why is there no news on rediff about naxal violance ? just today they huijacked an entire train in Jharkhand, blew up a govt building and killed some poll personnel ?? common rediff there is a limit to being congress helper..??? shame on rediff...
Re: why ?
by shaikhhamid on Apr 22, 2009 06:26 PM
i think u wake up late dear....just to the headlines.... i think it was the 2nd or 3rd headline of the day....