Re: Re: True Politician
by Quixotic arsenal on Apr 21, 2009 03:58 PM
pathetic she is, but she will play her trump card of castism .... and to please no one will bow down
Re: True Politician
by Rakesh Dandekar on Apr 21, 2009 05:16 PM
Then why she is worrying of transfer of cops as advised by New Election commission. This is routine. When she took the chair she has also done the same thing that time her time now this time chawla time. there is no falthu discussions. God is great.
Re: Re: she's one bludy beach who should be sunk....
by ashwini ghadge on Apr 21, 2009 03:43 PM
otherwise they will delete my message hohohohoho! this is just like 'sun of a beach'!
Re: she's one bludy beach who should be sunk....
by Ganga on Apr 21, 2009 04:16 PM
Let Sonia and Jaya Bachchan also follow. Same treatment to Munnabhai as well
Re: Sonia should answer..
by RAJASEKHAR GOLAKOTI on Apr 21, 2009 04:24 PM
She Certifies there is no RAM! She Certifies there is no Raheem! Can she certifies there is no Jesus! God is one and only one! We have various Avatars of God at various occassions to show the right path to Humans. But sadly we are ignoring his holy & divine messages to be in right path. Now time has come like this people are ignoring god and he yet to take new avatar to cleanse this earth and prove.
Re: Sonia should answer..
by anil pillai on Apr 21, 2009 04:24 PM
Christ is a ordinary person ,who came to India (Kashmir) studied vedic ,gone back and Romas for their self interest magnified him as a god.He learned magical powers from India.Then they created Bible.Copied many things from Vedic,Just like Krishna born in Jail,Christ born among sheeps,Just like 10 Avatars,10 commandments,etc.Earlier version of Bible have several mistakes like Sun revolves Earth,etc.Then corrected
Re: Sonia should answer..
by RAJASEKHAR GOLAKOTI on Apr 21, 2009 04:25 PM
She Certifies there is no RAM! She Certifies there is no Raheem! Can she certifies there is no Jesus! God is one and only one! We have various Avatars of God at various occassions to show the right path to Humans. But sadly we are ignoring his holy & divine messages to be in right path. Now time has come like this people are ignoring god and he yet to take new avatar to cleanse this earth and prove his existance.
Re: Sonia should answer..
by Om Garg on Apr 21, 2009 03:52 PM
Sonia started her election campaign in faizabad by saluting abd invoking of lord Rama whose existence herGovt denied inSupreme court What a nautanki she was performing Let her first accept existence of Lord Rama just like hes yisu and Mohmad saheb
Re: Re: Sonia should answer..
by RAJASEKHAR GOLAKOTI on Apr 21, 2009 04:49 PM
Sonia now well versed in playing political Nautanki in India! That's why i hate these Indian Politics, politicians and Indian populace for whom having very short memory and who don't have shame. We need a British Rule. We all are deserved to be like slaves atleast for one more century.
Re: Re: Sonia should answer..
by Umashanker Kapoor on Apr 21, 2009 04:05 PM
nautanki is performed by LKAji mah by rath yatra for Lord Ram, and then forgetting all about the rath yatra till election period.
Re: Sonia should answer..
by Umashanker Kapoor on Apr 21, 2009 03:54 PM
rashid (now a british citizen) answered the question and was given fatwa by aayaatooolaaah kaaameeni. the fatwa is yet to be executed. similarly, a fatwa by baaaj daaals, sir reme shaina, sieve shaina shus be given, but unfotunately, all these outfits are busy burning xtains, dmolition of their places of worship, bashi8ng young girls.
Re: Sonia should answer..
by Prashant Mardolkar on Apr 21, 2009 03:34 PM
Sonia didnt say that you moron! the fellow who said that is contesting in Tamilnadu on BJP ticket! strange no?
Re: Re: Sonia should answer..
by RAJASEKHAR GOLAKOTI on Apr 21, 2009 04:34 PM
Sonia & Karunanidhi, both raised questions on the existance of RAM and the existance of RAM Sethu. It is very evident and every body knows it. Sorry for your poor knowledge. see & refer last year news papers to upgrade your GK. They are much deliberate and go to any level to alter the truth which ever they want to! This is just some those Universal Truth.
Re: Re: Re: Sonia should answer..
by Sathish N on Apr 21, 2009 03:40 PM
he will not reply.... because he does not have an answer.. church teaches them to lie openly. All they have to do is confess to the church father at the end of the day.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sonia should answer..
by Prashant Mardolkar on Apr 21, 2009 03:42 PM
I am a Hindu. I have a ceritificate from BJP proving my participation in babari destruction.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sonia should answer..
by Siddique Ansari on Apr 21, 2009 04:24 PM
May be you are a Hindu, may be you participated in babari destruction, may be you have a certificate from bjp, but all the same you cannot be an Indian.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sonia should answer..
by Ganga on Apr 21, 2009 04:12 PM
Still you are stating this? It is high time we throw congress out of the country. Why congress is not talking about indian money in foreign banks? The information is readily available with German govt for free and they are willing to share this with other govts (and not political parties). Why Manmohan singh doesn't fight elections? Poor weak man doesn't have confidence to win? or Madamji ne nahi kaha?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sonia should answer..
by Umashanker Kapoor on Apr 21, 2009 04:09 PM
and bbjjpp promotes stricter laws, cutting off of hands, bashing (even teeereeeing of geeenes) of young girls, burning of xtians.
Re: Re: Sonia should answer..
by PANKAJ SAWANT on Apr 21, 2009 03:43 PM
I can notice the anger against BJP from your statement. But moron your congress will not be elected in these elections. Your italian lady will be behind bars after next elections for fraud.
Re: Re: Re: Sonia should answer..
by Umashanker Kapoor on Apr 21, 2009 04:16 PM
exactly what some of your member told her on the death of her husband in the bofors issue. she is a brave lady and did not even join politics after the death of her husband. after a couple of years she led the congi when the congi was bad in shape. since then she became leader of opposition and later became the chairperson of UPA. she did not become PM and thereby saved the shaving of head of a very senior and respect female bbjjpp leader. so even if the UPA looses election, she will not be coward like the INNDDAA cowards removing the shine of shinning india and its army.
There is no doubt that all the decision s of EC ARE TAKEN in consultation with congress leadership that is why shrinivasan of Andhra and Lalu were not punished or jailed though their offences were bigger than that of Varun Real drama will unfold on May 16 when congress leadreship will be invited even when they would have no majority CPM will now realize what blunder they have done in Predendial election
Re: ELECTION COMMISSION
by Umashanker Kapoor on Apr 21, 2009 03:34 PM
how can she get arrested laaaluji mah when the neeteeshji mah is the CM. neeteeshji mah should immidiately clamp NNSSAA as maaayaaaben had done in ulta praadeesh.
Re: ELECTION COMMISSION
by suyash rawle on Apr 21, 2009 03:28 PM
om guru, u support varuns statement of cutting hands & also want bjp that means u want junglee raj.remember civil society does not accept statements of all 3.gopalswami appointment was impartial or what?bjp misused dr.kalam.dont behave like cat that thinks noone looks at it while drinking milk.fools
Re: Re: ELECTION COMMISSION
by Allah Khaun on Apr 21, 2009 04:08 PM
misused Kalam? are you in your senses? you are not even worthy of being his hair? done involve that men in your politics
Re: Re: ELECTION COMMISSION
by rkjack rkjack on Apr 21, 2009 03:56 PM
because you are knowledge is limited to the 10 janpath and congress party. So except that you can't utter anythink. Every body known who is using whome here in the country.
Re: Re: ELECTION COMMISSION
by Om Garg on Apr 21, 2009 03:42 PM
How can you say i support varun when varun was punished why not these two bafoons .As for Dr KALAM he was best President after Dr R ajrndra Prasad and Dr Radhakrishan IT IS YOU WHO is barking like dog
