Re: Congress is anti-poor
by Bharat K on Apr 21, 2009 12:45 AM
because the "Poor" in UP and Bihar realized the true picture of Congies....they came to realize that rather than importing leaders from outside, it is better to have home grown leaders who have compulsion to do something..So called Cong party that wants to protect "Poor" has unfortunately been trying to define the word "Poor" and elimianate the "Poor" from lexicon....thereby the "Poor" people exist only in reality and not on books....just like Kashmiri Pandits deserted Kashmir on their own as per Congress and they were not forced out..Only an idiot will believe this non-sense. India does not need a good-looking or charming leader....otherwise why have election, choose SRK or Amitabh and you are done..India needs a leader who can and who will do something..
Dear Chiru ! As a responsible citizen,its our duty to caste vote,but the problem is that no one in this politics is honest and genuine.Whom to vote?,Regional parties do not have any particular stand for national interest,they only have their own interest to grow big,get more seats to blackmail the govt at center.Where as National parties compromise with any regional parties to form govt.Now the point is that even if we dont like a particular party or a a particular party has no major number,then also in the era of coalition govt,a party with 5 M.P.'s also roar like a lion and blackmail at the centre.
When I see a picture like this,I feel India has gone back to 1500 AD when a common citizen's only dream was to see the king or the princess.What the king or queen said or did had been of very little relevance at that time.Watching and if possible touching the prince or princess was considered a great thing in life. It gives me pain to say the situation has not changed now for about 500 million people of the country,mostly illiterate,ill-nourished and impoverished.No wonder,we r still called slumdogs by the civilised world!! But what gives me greater pain is that even the educated elites r doing "bandana" of the king's family members.The psychophants were there in that medieval period also.They picked up crumbs thrown to them mercifully by the royal family.The crumbs r available at 21st century as well.
Re: India has gone back to medieval age!!
by Atanu Chatterjee on Apr 20, 2009 11:43 PM
honestly in this particular case, its not about royal family(and they are not royal by any means, they have been politicians for 4 generations). I guess for priyanka its more about the grace and personality. Offcourse we have many people in india with grace & personality but probably not the look that priyanka has.
Re: Re: India has gone back to medieval age!!
by virat v on Apr 20, 2009 11:45 PM
rhaul gandhi is not a proper candidate for their cong leadership. priyanka seems to b naturally gifted to hv leadership quality
Wow priyanka gandhi is so gorgeous and has a lot of charisma she reminds me of her granny Indira Gandhi.on the contrary BJP is filled with senile old people and uneducated chaddis.
Re: Priyanka
by Sachin Purohit on Apr 20, 2009 11:40 PM
Yeah ..you are right. In fact, Mallika Sherawat looks so gorgeous and has a lot of charisma. So lets make Mallika Sherawat the PM of India
Re: Re: Priyanka
by Sachin Purohit on Apr 20, 2009 11:42 PM
That way, we will have Pratibha Shekhawat (our President is Shekhawat and not Patil) as president and Mallika Sherawat at PM!
Re: Priyanka
by Vijai Kumar on Apr 20, 2009 11:56 PM
ok... so we are going for some fashion week... which is it!?!?! a 10 CRORE budget 5 year Election Fashion week...
huh!!! please!!! have some sense... make some sense...
Re: Congress has to leave asap
by ithinampassi on Apr 20, 2009 11:30 PM
I am almost got tripped when I read Rahul did lots of revolutionary things for India....
One revolutionary thing was at Kozhikode recently, this man came with a booze party and celebrity girls and had fun time for the natives with semi nude girls dancing...and police had fun time too.
Another evolutionary thing was when he caught in LA with 800000$....
And then with his Brazilian girl friend....
Then his India yathra in BMWs and SPG proteciton.....
Re: Congress has to leave asap
by mohammed on Apr 20, 2009 11:30 PM
narrow minded morons like u are welcome to vote for bjp, which will never come to power. it will be secular forces again. priyanka and rahul may be from the gandhi family but they have a broad vision of india unlike the narrow vision of the sang parivar.
Re: Re: Congress has to leave asap
by ad na on Apr 20, 2009 11:35 PM
Mohammed, is congress secular? PM says Muslims have first right on India's resources, is that being secular. Secularim means no discriminiation based on religion. They have simply used muslims to retain power just like BJP is trying to use Hindus. Congress though stands for neoptism and dynasty politics and is led by an Italian and thats why it must go.
Re: Congress has to leave asap
by Vijai Kumar on Apr 21, 2009 12:05 AM
please guys - 1: quote these ppl as pseudo-gandhis'[the real gandhi is much a better person] 2: one shud know this nehru-turned-'pseudo-gandhi' family tree... any indian who is brought up in the indian beliefs will hate this family 3: none of them have intellectual capability to represent much dynamic india - sonia, rahul, priyanka in particular. 4: rahul, until the last decade, was spendin honeymoon in andaman & nicobar islands with his white chick. & all of a sudden he becomes a much sober samatarian. 5: sonia should proove her religion status - is she really converted to hinduism to extend her children as well...
Re: Re: Congress has to leave asap
by Ragini Arora on Apr 21, 2009 12:37 AM
You people seem to be big jokers, on one hand you are talking about secularism, and on the other hand you are asking a lady to become hindu. however she has accepted hinduism long back.
Re: Re: Re: Congress has to leave asap
by Guest on Apr 21, 2009 12:29 AM
May bhagwan give common sense to Tamil ppls who are mean like you, who just think about themselves, being Indian these guyies feel shame to talk in there national language. What a shame.
If people of Amethi and Rae Bareliiy were so smart then Gandhi parivar would have been history by now. Nothing has changed in Amethi for last 60 years but alas Rahul will win.
Re: Re: She says poeple wont vote if you havent worked for them.
by ad na on Apr 20, 2009 11:40 PM
Nope i am not but i know my country enough to know that Amethi is the poorest regions of India. I hope we can agree on that atleast.
Re: She says poeple wont vote if you havent worked for them.
by Sachin Chander on Apr 20, 2009 11:23 PM
You thought people are stupid, thats why lost the 2004 election. If you were so intelligent you might have started with treating yourslef of the disease of huberousity
Re: She says poeple wont vote if you havent worked for them.
by ithinampassi on Apr 20, 2009 11:32 PM
The idea here is to keep them as bad as we can.... so that congress will keep winning....
This is sort fo a communist idea, but works for congress too...
Re: Re: She says poeple wont vote if you havent worked for them.
by ad na on Apr 20, 2009 11:20 PM
Bharat nahi yaar Italian Mata ki jai bolo. Her swiss bank account swells as Amethi remains hungry. Oh well people of Amethi deserve it. The love her.
Re: Re: Re: She says poeple wont vote if you havent worked for th
by VIshal on Apr 20, 2009 11:23 PM
They get what they deserve ..Remember its democracy
The Pakistani flag is now being hoisted in five districts of states like Assam where the Muslim population has gone up significantly. 92000 Hindu and 6000 Christians are now languishing in refugee camps. The government has turned a blind eye to this.
In the name of security, innocent people have been put in jails, whereas people like Yaasin Malik who has 23 murder charges on him, are moving Scot free and gathering their own strength. Is it acceptable to any patriotic Indian?
Can the Congress led UPA promise a non-muslim CM in J&K ? Reservation for a Hindu student in Nagaland ? If so, we wholeheartedly support them.. Otherwise they should sit at home the next few years and rethink their policies.
Can our politicians stop stooping down to any lengths just for money and power ? Like Mr.Sharad Pawar, who first ditched the Congress and then ditched the people and aligned back with the Congress, just to be in power.
Dont be deceived. What appears to be communal is not communal, and what appears to be secular is not secular. It is time we change our thinking.
