Decision of the SC to release VARUN only on a parole is NOT ACCEPTABLE and is simply furtherence of humiliation already meted out to him. All democratic citizens should condemn this abominable act of victimization of an innocent, who has several times denied having made any derogatory speech. VARUN was not given any fair hearing either by police or state nor the S COURT. All are competing with each other to play into the gallery of pseudo-secularists and muslim fundamentalists. HINDUS should oppose this senseless and crafty use of law to frame innocent hindus. The use of undemocratic means by so called law makers and law protectors in order to terrorize and subjudicate hindus is condemnable. ARE HINDUS SLAVES IN INDIA? DO THEY HAVE NO VOICE? SHOULD NOT ANY HINDU ORGANISATION SPEAK FOR HINDUS? THEN WHAT IS THE USE OF HINDU ORGANISATION WHICH CANNOT PROTECT THE INTERESTS OF HINDUS? IS INDIA RULED BY MOGHALS, AURANGAZEB, BABARS, GHORIS, TIPPU, GHAZNIS, TALIBANS ? NO DOUBT THEIR LEGACY IS STILL AT LARGE. IT IS CLEAR CASE OF ATROCITY ON MAJORITY COMMUNITY WHICH SHOULD OPPOSED BY ALL RIGHT THINKING HINDUS.VARUN should be released unconditionally and immediately. His detention is ILLEGAL and BARBAROUS. ENGLISH MEDIA IS ALSO TO BE BLAMED FOR THIS SITUATION. People of UP should reject mayavati who is eying on muslim votes to win elections.
Since Hinduism is based on CASTE hierarchies, it intrinsically seeds HATRED in your Children(e.g. Varun Gandhi). Hence, * You must vote for your CASTE till 85% of all registered marriages in India are INTER-CASTE or INTER-FAITH. * Only he can UNDERSTAND your culture and IMPROVE your socio-economic status. * And do not worry if he is CORRUPT. This is the only way to STOP dis-integration of India.
Re: You must VOTE for candidates from your CASTE only.
by kristianhaterthesecond on Apr 16, 2009 10:07 PM
othai parai kudhi kizh jadhi thevdiymagane. ommala theru naye okka
Well MS.Mayathi you can kiss good bye to your PM dream because without the support of hindus you can become a PM and it will always remain a dream for you
Re: Kiss good bye to your PM dream
by CongressIN on Apr 16, 2009 11:55 PM
But to my feeling, she was badly advised by her advisors, who cunningly wanted to stop her march.
She hs dug her own grave along with her will go all the kizh jadhi parai thevdiyamagans.hind00 rashtr our aim. mayawati will go back where she came from public toilet of lucknow
MS MAYAVATHI CM OF UTTARAPREDESH, 1ST YOU TAKE CARE OF YOUR PARTY AND TELL THEM NOT TO COLLECT FUNDS FROM THE PUBLIC FOR YOUR BIRTHDAY AND OTHER OCCATIONS, THEN YOU TALK OTHERS, AFTER ALL YOU ARE SCHOOL TEACHER BEFORE JOINGING TO POLITICS, WHERE YOU GOT SO MUCH OF MONEY CORRES OF RUPEES, ITS PUBLIC MONEY YOU LOOTED IN THE NAME OF BIRTHDAY OR DEATH DAY OF YOUR PARTY HOLDERS,YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF BEHAVING LIKE THIS
Re: regarding varun
by prakash reddy on Apr 16, 2009 10:02 PM
PLEASE DO NOT VOTE BAS SINCE ITS A REGIONAL PARTY THEY CANOT DEVELOP THE ENTIRE COUNTRY, AND IF SHE COMES TO POWER IN CENTER, NOW SHE IS LOOTING UP ONLY THEN SHE WILL START LOOTING THOUROUT INDIA FOR HER BIRTH DAY COLLECTIONS FUNDS, AND IF ANYBODY REFUSED, SHE WILL TELL THERE FOLLWERS TO KILL THEM SO DONT VOTE BSP AS FOR MY OPENION ITS A WASTE PARTY FIT FOR NOTHING
Re: MAya didi should marry a taliban
by exotic on Apr 16, 2009 09:54 PM
you upper crest l9afers cannot tolerate an Iron lady just because she bel0ngs to a low caste.. shame on you you p1nk chadd1es .. its because of you creatures that casteism has increased in our country..
if only you had given equal status to all castes thsi lasy would not have got so much power...
Re: Re: Re: MAya didi should marry a taliban
by Pyare Mohan on Apr 16, 2009 10:25 PM
Sutap Acharji,,,, do you understand wht TERA BAAP has written? wich language?
Re: MAya didi should marry a taliban
by CongressIN on Apr 16, 2009 11:49 PM
Orchid: You call her didi, means sister, and wish she marry taliban. You can't be a good brother to your own sisters, I bet.
All Brahmins are the Same....Earlier Sawarkar and now Varun.. they will do anything to save thier lives.. Sawarkar begged with british while Varun Begged for his life with Dalits (Mayawati) all Dalits should celebrate this as Vijay Diwas
Re: All Brahmins are the Same...
by ramaswamy sunderrajan on Apr 16, 2009 09:54 PM
Your congenital hatred for Brahmins has blinded you to the fact that Varun is not a Brahmin. At this rate if Mayavati crosses your path you are likely to convet her also a Brahmin.
Many thousands of different village religions (Entirely different from this Hindu Brahmanical Relegion) in India were artificially combined and the single digit Hindu Religion became double digit in the First British Census in 1830. The Aryans came to power on the Congress elephant by deviously converting the pre-independence political debate and struggle into a communal religious struggle. This was made possible by the master stroke of Mahatama Gandhi - who made "Hindus" a 55% majority on paper in the 1920s upon getting the Dalits or "untouchables" (20%) dubbed as "Hindus" by the British. This coup moved the "Hindus" from 35% to a 55% majority in British India . In pre-independence India, Muslims were 25%, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Tribal Religions etc. formed the remaining 20%.This action along with recognition of Congress as the sole political representative of all Indians in national matters, was a payoff by the British colonial authorities to the Aryan lead Congress and Gandhi for loyal services rendered to British empire in supporting their World War I war effort; recruiting the "martial" communities (e.g. Sikhs, Jats, Rajputs, Gujars etc) of the northwest and Muslims to go fight for the British Empire in Europe/Middle east; subduing, opposing, infiltrating and sabotaging other non-Congress/non-Aryan lead political parties and independence movements organized at home. The55% fraudulent "Hindu pile" was little more than a political game.
Re: MAKING OF A MINORITY TO MAJORITY BY BRITISH FOR POLITICAL REA
by ramaswamy sunderrajan on Apr 16, 2009 09:57 PM
What is your source for this 'scientific' thesis?
Hindi people and Urudu people are relativesArtificiallyseperated While, at the spoken level, Urdu and Hindi are considered dialects of a single language (or diasystem), they differ vastly in literary and formal vocabulary; where literary Urdu draws heavily on Persian and Arabic, literary Hindi draws heavily on Sanskrit and to a lesser extent Prakrit. The grammar and base vocabulary (most pronouns, verbs, adpositions, etc.) of both Urdu and Hindi, however, are the same and derive from a Prakritic base. The associated dialects of Urdu and Hindi are known as "Hindustani". This shows the present day Hindi people and Urudu people are relatives artificially seperated by Relegions.. Also the Muslims of India are Original Sons of Soil forcefully or voluntarily became Muslims and They who are Original Indians and our relatives and should be treated equally, because they are sons of soil.
Re: Hindi people and Urudu people are relativesArtificiallysepera
by kafir chronicles on Apr 16, 2009 09:54 PM
Dravidians are the original inhabitants of South India. South, North had North East had nothing in common. UP politics should be confined to UP. Regional parties should not be allowed to set shop in other states or it will only worsen an already volatile situation. Let SP,BSP etc remain in UP/Bihar.
Re: Re: Hindi people and Urudu people are relativesArtificiallyse
by Tera Baap on Apr 16, 2009 09:46 PM
then leave India if you are afraid of living with such people...who is stoping you or forcing you my child?
The White Indians came to power on the Congress elephant by deviously converting the pre-independence political debate and struggle into a communal religious struggle. This was made possible by the master stroke of Mahatama Gandhi "Santhans" a 55% majority on paper in the 1920s upon getting the Dalits or "untouchables" (20%) dubbed as "Santhans" by the British. This coup moved the "Santhans" from 35% to a 55% majority in British India . In pre-independence India, Muslims were 25%, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Tribal Religions etc. formed the remaining 20%.This action along with recognition of Congress as the sole political representative of all Indians in national matters, was a payoff by the British colonial authorities to the White Indian lead Congress and Gandhi for loyal services rendered to British empire in supporting their World War I war effort; recruiting the "martial" communities (e.g. Sikhs, Jats, Rajputs, Gujars etc) of the northwest and Muslims to go fight for the British Empire in Europe/Middle east; subduing, opposing, infiltrating and sabotaging other non-Congress/non-Aryan lead political parties and independence movements organized at home (who saw British weakness during the war as an ideal opportunity). The 55% fraudulent "Santhans" was little more than a political game of White Indian and political parties in Delhi while caste Santhans would not eat/touch/marry/socialize/even worship with their"polluted"Dalits in 1920s. (20% untouchables) in the 1920s
