In 1659, before the Adilshahi General Afzal Khan of Bijapur rode out to encounter & murder Shivaji Maharaj, he was foretold that he, Afzal, would not survive the encounter. So, Afzal, before leaving on his mission, had his 64 wives murdered by drowning within one hour, and buried in a specially-contructed graveyard, as he did not want his wives to outlive him.
This is how the "Religion of Peace" works. Our history text-books conveniently omitted to tell us this interesting fact about the 'peaceful' character of Afzal Khan.
This graveyard, called 'Saat Qabar’ (60 graves) can be seen even today in Bijapur, Karnataka.
Shivaji Maharaj despatched this wife-murdering garbage Afzal to his ignominous death, and saved all of us.
The truth is that we Indians are neither Arabs nor Portuguese. We are NOT a Semitic people. So, we have no use for any of the Semitic religions (Judaism, Xtianity, Islam).
We have only one true home-grown religion, namely Hinduism, and this is the religion of all Indians, only some of us have forgotten our own roots ! Some of are under delusions and go about hiding under skull-caps & beards or behind wooden-crosses & white-cassocks, forgetting the religion of our own forefathers.
We should all proudly embrace our glorious Hindu roots. Then, India would a peaceful, prosperous, happy super-power.
Re: We brown-skins are ALL Hindus !
by Amir on Apr 08, 2009 12:19 PM
FIRST OF ALL INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION IS NOT A HINDU CIVILIZATION...
HINDUISM GAINED ITS FORM AND TEXTURE AFTER INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION WHICH IS AROUND 3000 BC, RIGVEDA AND OTHER LATER VEDAS WERE WRITTEN AFTER 2000- 1500 BC. RAM AND MAHABHARATHA HAPPENED AFTER THE VEDIC PERIOD.
HINDU WORD IS BORROWED FROM PERSIAN AND ARABIC VOCABULARY... IT SIMPLY MEANS PEOPLE LIVING BEYOND RIVER INDUS, IT DOESNT CATEGORIZE ANY RELIGION.
MUSLIMS CAME TO INDIA IN 622 A.D. THE WORLDS FOURTH MOSQUE IS SITUATED AT KONDAGALLUR KERALA, WHICH WAS BUILT DURING LIFETIME OF MOHAMMED SAW BY MUSLIM TRADERS.
THE SO CALLED RELIGIOUS GROUP OF HINDUS HARDLY RULED INDIA FOR 600 YEARS OF 3000 YEARS OF HISTORY 1000 YEARS THE BUDHISTS RULED INDIA 1200 YEARS THE MUSLIMS THE BRITISHERS 200 YEARS.
MUSLIMS ALSO INVADED INDIA APART FROM TRADING ROUTES OF KERALA, THE SAME WAY THE ARYANS ALSO INVADED INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION AND DROVE THE DRAVIDIANS TO THE PRESENT SOUTH INDIA.
Mulayam Singh does not give nomination to somebody unless he is a notorious criminal. Everybody in SP including Mulayam Singh are tax evaders, noted criminals and illegaly accumulating asstes. This Azmi is a known Dawood associate. he even attended the wedding ceremony of Dawood's brother(Suja I guess).
Mulayam Singh does not give nomination to somebody unless he is a notorious criminal. Everybody in SP including Mulayam Singh are tax evaders, noted criminals and illegaly accumulating asstes. This Azmi is a known Dawood associate. he even attended the wedding ceremony of Dawood's brother(Suja I guess).
No body wants to talk about his background, on how he came to Bombay and made his wealth. Now, we come to know he is worth 124 crores. IMO, such guys must be thoroughly investigated and their wealth must be made public. This man is one anti India guy.
The process of giving affidevits about assets and other information is farcical.
Rahul declared he has completed M. Phil. Well he has not. He mentioned the name of course wrongly. He also mentioned the wrong year. What is anyone doing about it.
He mentions two properties in his assets. A six acre land in Faridabad worth 28 lacs only? Who is fooling whom?
as per the recent swiss study, please add up all your MPs in Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, State legistative assemblies and State legislative councils, all party spokesman and multiply by 15.8 crore. thats the total assets of all this "breed". Mind you 15.69 is only the average. if you go by the salary and perks their average should be around 8.5 lacs. Don't forget to add the average 130 crores average in the Swiss and Cayman Islands accounts. It pays to be a politician, too much of hard work and short longegivity in cricket.
Re: national wealth
by Suraj Rathi on Apr 07, 2009 02:03 AM
This stupid requirement of declaring "assets" is asinine and a farce!
As if these international peemps are going declare what all they really own!
BTW, the term 'moveable assets' is very fluid in its meaning!
moveable to and from where? and if they move, how much has been moving?
I don't understand why we spent 100s of crores on this meaningless exercise called the general elections?! We all know no party will get a clear majority and the one with the highest count will find "sleeping partners" to form a coalition to collectively roger the country for the next 4-5 years!!
Re: Re: Assets
by shashi pai on Apr 07, 2009 02:02 AM
but this asset was not declared.. we demand that it should be declared and exposed.. ..if she dares, i will vote for abu..!
Re: Re: Re: Assets
by Jai on Apr 07, 2009 06:38 PM
I think those two assets must be declared and should be distributed amongest people of this country so that there will be no hunger left due to abundance of dairy products....LOl
