Re: jairam is a chamcha
by arkit on Apr 03, 2009 09:25 PM
Nonsense, stop making nasty comments. Do u know his education lavel. It is a pitty of India that Ramesh like highly educated people have to sit next to Lalu, Advani, Mulayam like chors. People like Ramesh dream to become president of USA. Respect them and in turn it will uplift India
Re: Re: jairam is a chamcha
by AnUnknownIndian on Apr 03, 2009 10:03 PM
So what??? even MMS is also highly educated, but has he not turned slave to one uneducated lady who claimed to have done her master degree from Cambridge university??
Re: Re: jairam is a chamcha
by PEHCHANKAUN on Apr 04, 2009 09:49 AM
"Higher the education, higher the degree of chamchaness" -hence proved. Any doubt arkt?? Hehehe
Re: Fight between two IIT Bombay ites
by Calspadeaspade on Apr 08, 2009 05:33 PM
Instead of doing some real Engineearing work and innovation , they are innovating in politics. What a shame! No wonder India i sno where near China in manufacturing.
Re: Fight between two IIT Bombay ites
by Bharat K on Apr 04, 2009 12:24 AM
being from IIT does not mean anything..our PM is from LSE and see what he has done....this guy from LSE is licking sandals of an uneducated italian...same goes for Jairam who is from IIT.
Make a strict policy to control population explosion.
No citizen with more than 2 children is eligible to even apply for a Government post, they cannot contest in elections, and some of the benefits like interest rates in banks and other such things should not be provided to those who have more than 2 kids!..
And yes, the same rule for all Indian nationals, caste/ re l gion no bar!
Re: control population explosion
by Kamlesh Shah on Apr 04, 2009 03:29 AM
I would suggest additional tax /additional ki i.e higher tax for the same amount of income earned by that person.
Re: Re: control population explosion
by Bharat K on Apr 04, 2009 12:26 AM
yes....because m0slems are super class of citizens...normal rules applicable to all Indian citizens do not apply to them in india
DESPERATION 85% of Indians are languishing in an informal economy to earn $2 a day so that they can feed a MEAL for their family. Hence their lives oscillate between DESPERATION and FRUSTRATION. They will SUCCUMB easily to CORRUPTION and vote in ELECTIONS for 100 rupees BRIBE.
COLLUSION No TAXES means no CIVILIZATION. And only 1% of eligible 15% Indians pay Personal INCOME Tax. India's richest sportsman SACHIN TENDULAR himself is UNCIVILIZED and shamelessly EVADED taxes when he imported FERRARI sports car.
Indians HATE each other and does not want fellow Indian to SUCCEED. CASTE aka socio-economic collusion is the HIDDEN agenda between any two individuals in Politics, Business, Police and Judiciary. Since ONLY source of FUNDS for Political Parties is BRIBES from Businesses, they must be LOYAL to them.
SOLUTION "A country is not made of land; a country is made of its people." -- Unknown
* An armed society is a POLITE society. * And it is not FEAR that keeps us polite -- it is RESPONSIBILITY. * Police department gives arms LICENSE for just 100 rupees. * If you intend to be a RESPONSIBLE citizen, you need to own a hand gun in India.
Re: Truth
by karuna karan on Apr 03, 2009 08:35 PM
The harvard economist like our PM (MMS) and FM (PC) made the poor the poorest and the rich the richest. And now an IITian is supporting their work. See how this highly educated jackals spoil the country.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Truth
by kala bandar on Apr 03, 2009 09:46 PM
No, kala bandar- to make illiterates like you realize how qualified people can contribute to the society, unlike your mayawati's and mulayam's
Jairamjiki, Jairamji, that is the crux of the matter. NSS consumption expenditure survey stops at 2004-05, almost immediately after Congress assumes its power at center with its communist allies. This was necessary to hide the increasing poor rich gap with FDI and that too immediately to avoid the charge of stopping it in the light of near future general elections. The price index goes down close to negative yet the prices of essential commodities soar. This is the magic of Congress which could not be done even by J.L.Nehru and I.G ! They must be beating their chest in the heavens for their political incompetency ! Jai-Ho !
Re: No NSS data on poverty, Jairam rebuts Sudheen's claim.
by Aby Koshy on Apr 03, 2009 07:39 PM
On what basis are you claiming the "increasing poor rich gap?"
Generally observing, or ... succumbing to propaganda?
Re: Re: No NSS data on poverty, Jairam rebuts Sudheen's claim.
by Against Pseudos on Apr 04, 2009 07:32 AM
Koshy:
Go on splitting as many hairs as you want..... :)
Truth of the matter is that it is Kaangress who has been ruling for a major part of the last 60 years.... Truth is that the Kaangress has had "Garibi Hatao" and "Aam Aadmi" as their major election planks.... Truth is that the Kaangress has done ab-so-lu-te-ly nothing about reducing the rich poor divide...
It has continuously gone up.... If you think the governor of RBI is generating propaganda, think again..
If you think suppressing data from coming out (NSS hasn't done a survey since 2004) will show up well on your resume, think again...
The actual Aam Aadmi knows what's going on around him. And he's the one who will decide the fate of these parties.... Not NSS, Not ISI, Not Kulkarni, or Not Ramesh...
Re: Re: No NSS data on poverty, Jairam rebuts Sudheen's claim.
by Bharat K on Apr 04, 2009 12:30 AM
well...it is Jairam who is saying "there is no official release of this data."....this means there is actual data available that paints the truth about increase in poverty....but Government has not accepted it (for known reasons)..hence it is not "Official"...this Idiot Jairam thinks that all of us poor guys are fools and we will buy his theory...we do not need a Jairam to tell anything to us...as we have been practically seeing increase in poverty on ground...incidentally it is never in the interest of Congress to decrease poverty...so no wonder poverty has increased under congress rule
Re: No NSS data on poverty, Jairam rebuts Sudheen's claim.
by Vivek Dev on Apr 03, 2009 08:05 PM
All these IIT fellows are duffers. Why these fellows are into politics when they should have been working in research labs beats me. IITs are only producing crap these days.
Re: Re: No NSS data on poverty, Jairam rebuts Sudheen's claim.
by kala bandar on Apr 03, 2009 09:44 PM
Do you think getting into IIT is as easy as blabbering on rediff. You don't have the right to comment on IITans, or for that matter any educated Indian.
Re: Re: Re: No NSS data on poverty, Jairam rebuts Sudheen's clai
by Bharat K on Apr 04, 2009 12:32 AM
dear kala bandar....you need to know that bandars are not welcome in areas populated by humans. So stop your crap and go away into your jungle or forest rather than threatening others for anything.
Sudindra may be technically wrong - the statistics he have given based on data as of 2004/05. But is there any reason why we'll not believe the number of poor people increased? They way the price of essentials are increasing and no earning opportunities for poor people - it'll be too hard for poor people to meet both ends.
Re: Re: Can Jairam disprove it?
by commie basher on Apr 03, 2009 06:47 PM
The policies of Kommies or kommie led front would drastically reduce the number of rich people. So, the major difference of rich and poor will disappear (every body becomes poor).
Despite high growth rates in Gujarat, exceeding 9 per cent per year over the decade of the 1990s, poverty in 36 villages located in the northeastern part of this state has changed hardly at all. In these villages, 9.5 per cent of households escaped from poverty over the past 25 years, but 6.3 per cent of households became poor at the same time. Escape and descent are not symmetric: different reasons account for escaping poverty than those for declining into poverty. Growth alone is hardly sufficient to achieve poverty reduction on any significant scale. Public policies will be needed to address directly the separate causes for descent into poverty.
Economic growth has proceeded apace in Gujarat over the past 25 years, but among households of 36 villages located in the northeastern part of this state, poverty has remained virtually unchanged over this period; 65 per cent of people in these villages were poor 25 years ago by their own reckoning, and 62 per cent are poor now in terms of the same criteria. Lack of food and clothing, inadequate and leaky shelters, assets insufficient to send their children even to primary school, and dependence on high-interest private debt characterise the conditions of poverty among villagers of this region. These conditions have not changed very much for many households, even as growth rates of almost 10 per cent per year have been observed overall in this state.
Re: Is powerty can be linked to parties?
by shareef sa on Apr 03, 2009 06:37 PM
BJP Left Congress 1999-2000 Gujarath WB Karnataka Rural 12.4 % 31.7% 16.8% Urban 14.8 14.7% 24.6%
Its time NGO's and other organizations start taking the responsibility of making 1 child policy mandatory in india. No govt can help reduce poverty when population spreads like hell.Poor people should stop breeding like a pig and middle class should stop with one and politicians should stop with one wife.
SK had made a mistake the Congress never like facts they are expertise in making caos in ppls mind & get the power by ANY MEAN. As Jairam correctly agreed the think tank props up issus as like by the HIGH COMMAND i.e. 10 janpath & as such copy promptly forwarded to Digvijay! Loality pays, Jairam keep it up.
Re: Jairam to SK on poverty
by shareef sa on Apr 03, 2009 06:11 PM
BJP talked about "Feel good factor" during last election...They never told about these statistics.
Now they want to talk about this statistics..again now they are opposit party.
Ultimately under these bloody politicians, people suffer....
Why parties come together before elections and think about solving poverty in india, rather than talking about it during elections?
What is the set standard for BPL measurement..? Is it same number like earlier years..? Then it is wrong...BPL line should be increase based on the inflation and living cost today to measure actual % of people below powerty line...
Did Cong ready to do it? Did BJP declare on this basis what the BPL % during their tenure....?
They dont do it...because they think people are sheeps and just listen to what they say....
