The author's memory seems to be short but his analysis about the symptom of the disease is correct. It is a broad symptom that runs in Nehru’s descendents to meddle with the country and do maximum damage as long as they fetch votes. You listed the actions of BJP but left out the reactionary actions of the Congress Party. Indira Gandhi did maximum damage to the polity of the country from which we have not recovered yet. The Emergency imposed by Indira Gandhi did cause havoc and she sent many capable opposition party members to jail. She created the problems with Sikhs by promoting and later demonizing Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale. Rajiv Gandhi messed up the situation in Jammu & Kashmir and Rajiv Gandhi was instrumental in destroying the uniform civil code in India. Those actions or karma by Nehru’s progeny have revisited the grandchildren. The assumption that one cousin is going to become PM in itself is a violation of what India stands for. Shouldn’t the voter’s be deciding that? Why do you assume that? - An accident of birth? Other than that what have either of them achieved? One was lucky, the other was unlucky. It is a bane of Indian politics. Thanks to Indira Gandhi's dynastic ambitions we are stuck with this. Now this is mirrored by dynastic politics in several states throughout India.
Re: Infectious diseases spread...
by eagle on Apr 07, 2009 05:08 AM
another blind mice. Well how come you think the bjp is clean white cloth. it is not a saffron brigade its a blood red brigade stained with blood of people they have killed.
I refer to the article by Dr.Sandeep. It is a pity that the Magsaysay Award winner should write such a diatribe even before the authenticity of the contents of inflammatory statements allegedly made by Varun is established. The CD reportedly was made from the mobile phone of one Singh.Varun could be bashed once the truth is known. Did he ever dare to comment on the inflammatory statements of Imams, Owasi and others? Did he say anything about the election campaign run by the Congress with posters designed by Rediff in the wake of the assasination of Indira Gandhi? He has joined the bandwagon of the " secular " media. Remember the allegations of raping of a nun in Jabua which turned out to be false. Was there any apologetic retraction. No.
Re: What do Varun Gansdhi's pronouncement mean?
by Vijayalakshmi on Apr 03, 2009 12:35 AM
This man Sandeep Pandey does not have the honesty to criticise the Nehruvian secularism, which is only 'minorityism', and discriminates against hindus.It is too much for us to expect anything truly humane from the 'reds' like him.I am sure other communities who are getting special privileges, by virtue of their being 'votebanks',would ever have tolerated it had it been otherwise! There would have been riots!But Hindus are expected by these 'sickularists' to be 'dhimmis'.
if anybody is under the impression that he or she can detach politics from religion in india then it shows a basic lack of understanding of the indian psyche. religion needs to be discussed. as do the other things like caste, reservation, minority, gender upliftment. lets accpet that equality is a farce and each thing has to be given place. if you say we are giving reservations and quotas based on percentage of population and other criteria , then respect the views and sentiments of the majority adn daont play with their feelings in order to gain cheap votes. be it congress , bjp or the others . what we need is a certain openness to discuss the problems we face , not bothering about vote banks?
tell me is any party strict enough to tackle the terrorism issue logically and cold heartedly without thinking if it disturbs the sentiments of a particular religion? is any party willing to tackle countries like pakistan unemotionally?
shame on us indians as we still think that caste and religion are too "backward " ideas that hinder development. if anything it is the fault of the man who practices the religion. curiously it is usually the man who is most religious who is most often silent. this by no way gives any right to anybody to demean hindus or muslims.
the only way is to address the wrongs and for that there needs to be discussions in forums can the media can go on a silent and masked anti hindu campaign denouncing every thing connected to one community ?
do you rmember when sixty pilgrims returning from ayodhya were burnt alive in a train bogie at godhra in gujrat.Mr. pandy,people like you did not feel anything against Musl ims.Please just imagine your relatives being being shut down in th train compartmnt and being burnt alive.can a normal human being do it?No sir. But the people did it.It is th most detestibl thing a human race, a human culture can do(I mean burning) and the more detestible than burning Hind us aliv was pandyes not feeling any thing for poor pilgrims till,rmember till,the people reacted.I think it was th most natural reaction by those whose relatives had been burnt. What I mean,pandey sir, be a bit of human being.merely becaus you are serving a particular organissation which is anti Hi ndus and anti India does not mean that you sell your conscious
Varun gandhi spoke against atrocites faced by mejorityes not hate speeh against any communit or religion. He spoke against terrorists and anti social elements in that locality so called secular politicians are fighting for minority votes and appeasing one community on the cost of mejority And if law against hate speakers implimented seriosly there won't be a single mulla in India who spread hatred against mejorities using religion that is dubbed as minority religios fredom and constitutional right etc. same activities done by mejority is said anti minorty anti muslim the writer should be remindied of 35000 communal riot and 78 bombblast in last four yers which took place duing secular govt regime and many vicitms belongs to mejority community be it securites or common person
Re: Re: varun gandhi zindabad
by Govindan on Apr 03, 2009 12:12 AM
Yes, indeed he is a stinking ,venomous commie who derives vicarious pleasure in BJP-bashing and RSS-bashing. It is this way, these traitors like Sandeep Pandey and vile Romillas manage to get Magsaysay Awards and others.They are venomously anti-hindu.
I think the writer is very myopic in his views. His leniancy towads the congress is blaring out and hatered for the BJP. I see the congress as the most communal party since 47 along with the community. All the BJP has been asking are quaestions as to where are we going with this so called secularism when one community is appeased at the cost of the majority. Then he dosent seem to have a problem. Writers are so sused to only looking at the last image fprgetting its the story before that matters and gave it the finality. Like forgetting the carnage in Godra but humiliating Modi a million times world over for the riots. Who is answerable for the 57 lives lost. I guess it dosent matter as they were hindus who were returning from a holy trip. If the same had been the other way round, god knows what would have happened.
Re: Not true
by Govindan on Apr 03, 2009 12:18 AM
Being a venomous commie that Pandey is, we cannot expect any humane thinking from him,as he is pathologically against the hindus.These 'red' scoundrels are supportive of the violent, predatory religions, and have only scorn for the tolerant, peaceful hindus.But still indulge in hindu-baiting and bashing!
