Discussion Board

''President''s rule only option''


Total 5 messages Pages | 1
Vishnu.R
President rule mandatory
by Vishnu.R on Feb 28, 2005 10:39 AM

first of all my opinion is that conducting assembly elections itself, is a waste of time for a state like Bihar (the most backward state in India ), Laloo & Rabri
have spoilt the environment so much that it is beyond repair for even a vision having party in power ,as we know all parties are corrupted,so its highly impropable that the ruling party will bring much change in Bihar

    Forward  |  Report abuse
s subramanyan
President;'s rule only option
by s subramanyan on Feb 28, 2005 08:33 AM

After having gone through a costly democratic elections, it is somewhat unseemly and immature on the part of Mr. Paswan to ask for President's rule.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
prasad
hi
by prasad on Feb 27, 2005 06:42 PM

i am from goa according to my opinion passwan is wright

    Forward  |  Report abuse
subbu
Bihar Elections
by subbu on Feb 27, 2005 06:29 PM

Ram Vilas Paswan's statement that the next chief minister of Bihar should be from the minority community is highly communal and obnoxious, specially when he has fought the elections on "secular" platform. Such statements should be outright condemned by every rightthinking Indian.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
manav
paswan the real hero
by manav on Feb 27, 2005 05:47 PM

the verdict of bihar is clear:laloo has been rejected because of incompetence and not caste factor.
rabri is of no consequence.

rjd must dump laloo and rabri and support paswan as the next CM of bihar.

laloo has failed to deliver the goods in bihar.

laloo must also resign as railway minister if he has little bit of self respect left



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 5 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message