Discussion Board

''Laws in India breed corruption''


Total 23 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Sree
Hi Sanjay
by Sree on Sep 02, 2005 07:10 AM

Hi Sanjay,

The way you said about our country's problem and the way how people are suffering still under poverty because of innosense and believing someone who speak nicely about them and make them understandable.

I hope atleast you does not utilize their poverty, innosense, believing on you and dirty politics just to make money for yourself and just enjoy later(there are thinking like even if you are not able to enjoy the wealth, your next generations atleast that is what ultimately every one think behind and say something different openly)

I think and hope you are not a man of that kind.

Keep up your profile in a good way for the fortune of our good country to see all coming generations.
Hope your step will help indians to follow for the betterment of our country to see as a developed one.

Thanks

Cheers

Sree
Malaysia

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Giri Girishankar
Re-structure Government
by Giri Girishankar on Apr 24, 2004 04:21 AM


Mr. Pandey says the laws in India today are so outdated they breed corruption. He presumably is referring to ambiguities in the laws which are then exploited by people and the officials alike to get their job done for a price. Everything has grown in size around us in all spheres of activities. Many of the activities are being performed per modern standards. Yet the laws governing them have remained outdated; so also the bureaucracy, which is the biggest service provider and which is the interface between these activities and the government.
Businesses periodically restructure themselves to be competitive and successful. They update their skills, tools, personnel, and interfacing methods with their customers. They find a better way to deal with their customers and competition. Likewise, they expect their dealings with law and bureaucracy to be clear, simple and straightforward. Outdated and ambiguous laws only make for inefficiency and increased costs.
The government has to have an established program of review of its interface with the people and their activities to make it as simple and efficient as possible. Accordingly, it has to restructure itself from time to time.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Avinash
Fascinating Interview.
by Avinash on Apr 23, 2004 05:55 AM

Three take-home messages I really liked in this interview:-

a) The need for a huge government,
b) Political oversight necessary for bureaucracy
c) India being ruled by a generation that has not quite understood the meaning of being 'free'.

Fascinating viewpoints sir, you obviously have given much thought to Indian polity and governance. I wish you the best in your future endeavours!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
amit
superb.
by amit on Apr 23, 2004 04:01 AM

Hi,
I wish i could do something to help this guy.
Can I get his eamil ID or phone number. ??

I would like to donate money to his campaign fund.

cheers
amit

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Prasad
Good Luck Sanjay
by Prasad on Apr 23, 2004 03:34 AM

Sanjay, I was so happy to read your interview. I wish you the very best in your aspirations. India needs more folks like yourself to achieve true progress and shine. Not just in slogans - but in reality in providing basic amenities to its citizens and improving the overall quality of life. I would love to help you in any capacity I can. Please let me know how I can help.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mukundan
Corruption
by Mukundan on Apr 23, 2004 03:27 AM

I wish Mr. Sanjay Pandey succeeds in his mission!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sunil Gopinath
You have my vote
by Sunil Gopinath on Apr 23, 2004 02:55 AM

Hello,

You are the kind of person i would be confortable with
governing our country & our people.

Hope you get elected.

regards
Sunil.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Gopalakrishna Pai
Re: Laws in India breed corruption
by Gopalakrishna Pai on Apr 23, 2004 01:12 AM

The points put by Sanjay Pandey are absolutely right -
about the need of youth in politics, about the concept of the lever/fulcrum, about the disparity of success between metros/rurals, about the hypocratic private sector, about the NGOs.

I would also like to add that there needs to be a debate-based approach to make laws/policies in parliament and not based on mere voting or endless arguments. This calls for a need of politicians who
have visions, know how to get to those visions by
implementing policies and the benefit of the society
at large in their purview. How many such politicians
occupy the resposible positions in the parliament
today?

Once we start voting the right kind of people up
there, will these petty interests of party, money
and power fade out. The capabilities of the candidates
should be the prime criterium of choice while we vote.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 23 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message