If Pant was OK to bat after his injury he ought to be good enough to keep wickets and the substitute keeper ought not to have been permitted but an on field player should have been asked to keep wickets. To take advantage of the substitute keeper rule, Pant shoudl have retired hurt and that would have been more gracious. t
Re: Pant and wicketkeeping
by Ravindra Joshi on Jan 09, 2021 02:15 PM
Don't know about new rules. Can Indian take 2nd replacement if Jadeja sits out due to enjury ??
