Discussion Board View article

Total 7 messages Pages | 1
Ramesh PK
Rahul Luckey
by Ramesh PK on Oct 27, 2020 04:53 PM

Dear Mr. Majrekar,
You are basically biased. Everyone says that form may desert people at some point of their playing career; but chances should be given based on the technique.
If you dont know, Rahul was picked up for KL Rahul was picked up for India after becoming Ranji highest scorer for multiple seasons!
If we go by your argument, then Rohit should not have been playing now as he did not click for many seasons and was also accused of temperament.
Dont be foolish...
I also know, whenever you scored 50 runs in a match, India would loose as you would take more than 10 overs for the same!


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Lucky rahul
by on Oct 27, 2020 11:27 AM  | Hide replies

True. Rahul is lucky. So too Rahane. 91 runs from last four tests. Manjrekar will not write about it. Birds of the same feather flock together.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
navdeep johar
Re: Lucky rahul
by navdeep johar on Oct 27, 2020 03:14 PM
Rahul miles ahead of Rahne. Any doubts

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ramesh PK
Re: Lucky rahul
by Ramesh PK on Oct 27, 2020 04:47 PM
Thanks Manjrekar for your expert comments.
Then How is Rohit Sharma playing cricket now?
He hould have been dropped from all formats long back!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Nitesh
Re: Lucky rahul
by Nitesh on Oct 29, 2020 12:10 AM
This Gavaskar, Bhogle and Manjrekar should be dropped from commentary panel..they patronize marathis too much.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Abstract baba
Re: Re: Lucky rahul
by Abstract baba on Nov 01, 2020 11:01 PM
Apt comment. All of them are biased to the core.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 7 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message