Discussion Board View article

Total 10 messages Pages | 1
sajid khan
WC#Final#2019
by sajid khan on Jul 15, 2019 02:44 PM

I think instead of deciding the winner by virtue of boundries, it would have been more appropriate if we have two more super overs, still the game is tied then joint winners or winner of the league stage should be considered.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sajid khan
WC#Final#2019
by sajid khan on Jul 15, 2019 02:44 PM

I think instead of deciding the winner by virtue of boundries, it would have been more appropriate if we have two more super overs, still the game is tied then joint winners or winner of the league stage should be considered.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
pradeep pawar
UNFAIR TO KANE WILLIAMSON
by pradeep pawar on Jul 15, 2019 12:03 PM

ICC rule as regards the tied match to add on a Super Over to find out the winner is really a gimmick. I understand that it was anyones game but after the super over tie, the Title should be shared by the two finalist.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Praveen Kumar Jain
Share the trophy' trends after Super Over saga in World Cup final
by Praveen Kumar Jain on Jul 15, 2019 11:17 AM

Request to ICC to please change the rule of giving the cup to the team which has scored more boundaries. It has no logic. After all both the teams have scored the same runs whether thru boundaries or physically running acroos the pitch. Newzeeland desreve to share the cup with England as the teams have tied up even in super overs. Hard luck NZ

    Forward  |  Report abuse
M IYER
Super Over
by M IYER on Jul 15, 2019 10:48 AM  | Hide replies

Single Super Over is Okay for a T20 match but for a ODI, it should be atleast 3 overs to be bowled by 3 different bowlers...in line with extra time in Football.

All the byes should be ruled out.

The batsman should not run on the fielding side of the pitch to avert the 'unlucky' boundary availed by Stokes/England in the Super Over.

The Free Hit Concept for a No Ball should be dumped altogether, instead give two runs.

And in case of a tie, which won't happen in all likelihood after 3-over match, a tie-breaker of one over should take place in which, bizzare as it is. only Sixers should be counted as boundary while all ground strokes should be scored by running between the wickets.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
M IYER
Re: Super Over
by M IYER on Jul 15, 2019 10:51 AM
an extra ball against a No-ball to remain

   Forward   |   Report abuse
manoj sharma
Both teams had equal runs
by manoj sharma on Jul 15, 2019 10:37 AM  | Hide replies

Both teams had made equal no of runs in their allotted 50 overs and super over then how come because of a silly rule England were declared winners. Feel sad for Williamson and Co.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
M IYER
Re: Both teams had equal runs
by M IYER on Jul 15, 2019 10:50 AM
an extra ball against a No-ball to remain

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ramesh Rao
New Zealand- True winner
by Ramesh Rao on Jul 15, 2019 09:59 AM

ICC is the culprit. strange rules have been formulated without any thought. it should been less wickets than more boundaries as a criteria to declare the winners. ICC , please change the rules. Great game by both the teams. Bit, I feel NZ were unlucky.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
anand fadnis
cricket final
by anand fadnis on Jul 15, 2019 07:58 AM

Rules are framed before any incident. Such unprecedented situation was not anticipated before. So ICC review all rules and regulations so that this type of situation can be avoided in future

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 10 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message