This is the perfect example the bowlers wins matches. RCB has most destructive batsmen in their ranks including two of the best in Virat and AB but their bowling is weak and hence they are loosing matches. On the other hand SRH has only Dhawan and Williamson as reputed batsman. Dhawan is in poor form and except for Williamson not other batsman is contributing, still they are winning matches because of their strong bowling unit. It is so strong that even wotihout their best bowlers in Bhuvi and Stanlake, they are winning matches. Yes, cricket is more oriented to batsmen but one should not forget that it is a team game and other aspects of the game like bowling, fielding and even wicketkeeping can win you the game. Even single catch dropped can result in a lost match, similarly a single costly over or a missed stumping chance can cost you match. Sometimes, low scoring matches are more entertaining than high scoring matches. Infact I like to see a bowler dominating a batsman rather than a batsman dominating a bowler.