Discussion Board

Dhoni and Virat: Record after Record!

Total 25 messages Pages | 1
Royston Crasta
 First three 100s in a row
by Royston Crasta on Sep 09, 2017 09:19 AM

You have forgotten Mohammed Azarudhin ! He scored consecutive centuries in his first 3 Tests !

    Forward  |  Report abuse
arupratan pal
 We know MSD n VK r d very best
by arupratan pal on Sep 05, 2017 11:51 AM  | Hide replies

These representation of data are merely statisticians delight and wastage of people's time. Spectators enjoy the match and not the stats. Nor the players care for it.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
MAMA KANS
 Re: We know MSD n VK r d very best
by MAMA KANS on Sep 05, 2017 04:54 PM


you are right. but yes you are right. I agree with you and yes I fully support your view.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
arupratan pal
 More aggression is required in cricket
by arupratan pal on Sep 05, 2017 11:48 AM

Let fast bowlers bowl any number of bouncers in an over

    Forward  |  Report abuse
jaspal negi
 WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by jaspal negi on Sep 05, 2017 10:57 AM  | Hide replies

IF A PERSON 100 STUPMPED IN 301 MATCHES HOW CAN PER 3 PER MATCH STUMPPINGS ? PLEASE PUBLISH DATA BEFORE VERIFY.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
MAMA KANS
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by MAMA KANS on Sep 05, 2017 04:52 PM
Bro, it is correct. Get your maths right. It is matches per stumping. The last sentence applies to you though incorrect. I believe it should read as "Please do not publish data before verifying"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
MAMA KANS
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by MAMA KANS on Sep 05, 2017 04:52 PM
Bro, it is correct. Get your maths right. It is matches per stumping. The last sentence applies to you though incorrect. I believe it should read as "Please do not publish data before verifying"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
MAMA KANS
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by MAMA KANS on Sep 05, 2017 04:52 PM
Bro, it is correct. Get your maths right. It is matches per stumping. The last sentence applies to you though incorrect. I believe it should read as "Please do not publish data before verifying"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
MAMA KANS
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by MAMA KANS on Sep 05, 2017 04:53 PM
Bro, it is correct. Get your maths right. It is matches per stumping. The last sentence applies to you though incorrect. I believe it should read as "Please do not publish data before verifying"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:10 AM
Bro get your maths right, it is matches per stumpings and not the other way around. Also your last sentence applies you better though totally wrong, "Please verify data before publishing"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:14 AM
There was a problem with post and hence not posted as many times. Apologies.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:10 AM
Bro get your maths right, it is matches per stumpings and not the other way around. Also your last sentence applies you better though totally wrong, "Please verify data before publishing"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:10 AM
Bro get your maths right, it is matches per stumpings and not the other way around. Also your last sentence applies you better though totally wrong, "Please verify data before publishing"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:10 AM
Bro get your maths right, it is matches per stumpings and not the other way around. Also your last sentence applies you better though totally wrong, "Please verify data before publishing"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:10 AM
Bro get your maths right, it is matches per stumpings and not the other way around. Also your last sentence applies you better though totally wrong, "Please verify data before publishing"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:10 AM
Bro get your maths right, it is matches per stumpings and not the other way around. Also your last sentence applies you better though totally wrong, "Please verify data before publishing"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:10 AM
Bro get your maths right, it is matches per stumpings and not the other way around. Also your last sentence applies you better though totally wrong, "Please verify data before publishing"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:10 AM
Bro get your maths right, it is matches per stumpings and not the other way around. Also your last sentence applies you better though totally wrong, "Please verify data before publishing"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:10 AM
Bro get your maths right, it is matches per stumpings and not the other way around. Also your last sentence applies you better though totally wrong, "Please verify data before publishing"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:12 AM
Bro, it is correct. Get your maths right. It is matches per stumping. The last sentence applies to you though incorrect. I believe it should read as "Please do not publish data before verifying"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
urvish sanghvi
 Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by urvish sanghvi on Sep 05, 2017 11:13 AM
Bro, it is correct. Get your maths right. It is matches per stumping. The last sentence applies to you though incorrect. I believe it should read as "Please do not publish data before verifying"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
MAMA KANS
 Re: Re: WRONG RATIO ANALYSIS
by MAMA KANS on Sep 05, 2017 04:51 PM
Bro, it is correct. Get your maths right. It is matches per stumping. The last sentence applies to you though incorrect. I believe it should read as "Please do not publish data before verifying"

Thanks, anyways.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Christy
 every thing is a record in cricket
by Christy on Sep 05, 2017 09:05 AM  | Hide replies

why make a fuss about it??? when the entire nation just is obsessed about one sports...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
shibaji rakshit
 Re: every thing is a record in cricket
by shibaji rakshit on Sep 05, 2017 10:02 AM
Virat kohli greatest ODI batsman ever

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 25 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message