Of late I am loosing interest in the game called cricket. It has become like a government in itself. All are corrupt. Now we have the latest information of the curator. I do not know who else is hiding being associated with fixing charges. If I look at Sreeshant now then I find him more innocent than people who are in charge and free.
I bet 100 to 1 that nobody including cricketers, curators, groundsman and least the media persons can predict even 50% of how the wicket will behave during a T20, ODI and Test match, unless of course the pitch has been watered few hours earlier as was done at Hirabaag in Pune about a decade or more ago. So to 'create' a pitch to 'suit' anybody is a big myth in itslef. When there is no guarantee of what you are offering, to help the bookies with ground reality is out of question. It is one thing when players cheat as living beings. Ground is 'dead' ,Man!
Re: Why not Curators
by Cynic on Oct 26, 2017 11:54 AM
This mindset, which has become accepted in the society, is the result of corruption in high places. Every public "servant" hardly justifies his position. So much so, that earning bad money has even come to be known as a matter of pride than shame.
If we are able to overcome this menace in our lifetime, we can proudly say our generation contributed something.
A person with salary of 65000rs and bcci pension should be never called underpaid.. if found guilty let it be groundsman or a watchman need to be penalised for their mistake.. no suspension it should be dismissal.