Discussion Board

Dissenting Rohit Sharma docked 50 per cent of his match fee


Total 15 messages Pages | 1
Subodha Barik
tell me umpire, bowlers already throwing this ball.
by Subodha Barik on Apr 25, 2017 08:03 PM

Batsman attempting this ball.This is ball is wide.BUT WHAT U DOING THIS.ITS LIKE,HAVE U ANY KIND OF LINKING(of this decision) FOR THIS MATCH.
MIND IT.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Subodha Barik
OK. ITS CANCELED !
by Subodha Barik on Apr 25, 2017 07:45 PM  | Hide replies

WHAT DOING ROHIT SHARMA.ITS 100% RIGHT.ITS LEGAL,But Umpire what giving order.Its 100% illegal.
Henceforth,i will notice to UMPIRE.Its this kind of issue ,after that this type of decision had rejected.
This is the MI captain’s second Level 1 offence this season.
its purely illegal type of decision.
Finally it will be canceled.
I WILL NOTICE TO THIS UMPIRE,NOT FURTHER HAPPENING THAT ANY TEAM OF THIS IPL MATCH.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Subodha Barik
Re: OK. ITS CANCELED !
by Subodha Barik on Apr 25, 2017 07:47 PM
Then your umpire ship will be dismissed.if doing next time.No need of your umpire ship.Many umpire is their.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sukhmeet singh
what
by sukhmeet singh on Apr 25, 2017 02:01 PM

if the umpire decision goes wrong .. will he also be fined ... is there any criteria for UMPIRES?
just asking if any body knows what happens when an umpire gives a wrong decision ?


    Forward  |  Report abuse
NAGRAJ KV
Umpires needs some sympathy
by NAGRAJ KV on Apr 25, 2017 01:56 PM

In a high pressure match and with so much crowd noice Umoires can do some mistakes.. Indian umpires are equal to world standards... even freign umpires do a lot of mistakes..


    Forward  |  Report abuse
P S SHAH
Rohit Sharma
by P S SHAH on Apr 25, 2017 01:34 PM  | Hide replies

Rohit Sharma has represented the country in Test and limited over matches and definitely he has more experience than the Umpire who did not give a clear no ball totally outside the off stump in crucial last over match against Pune. The Umpire atleast should have taken the help of Third Umpire before confirming his decision like they do. The Umpire was totally wrong and Mumbai lost the match after coming too close to victory due to serious lapse of Umpire who did not perform his duty fairly and efficiently. The fine levied to Rohit Sharma is not justified.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
P S SHAH
Re: Rohit Sharma
by P S SHAH on Apr 25, 2017 01:35 PM
it should be read as "wide ball " instead of "no ball "

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Srinivas
Re: Rohit Sharma
by Srinivas on Apr 25, 2017 02:05 PM
The ball was outside the guideline, but well within the batsman's reach because he moved outside the off stump. Hence the Umpire was absolutely right. By your logic, if a batsman gets outside the guideline (off or leg) and the ball goes between his legs, it should be deemed a wide !!

BTW, just because Rohit Sharma is an international player, he knows more than the Umpire, is it ??!! Maybe you don't know that S.Ravi is an international Umpire and is a part of the ICC's Elite panel.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
J Swaminathan
Re: Rohit Sharma
by J Swaminathan on Apr 25, 2017 02:05 PM
SO you want the experienced players should be the umpire for themselves?. As an experienced player Rohit should have accepted the decision what ever merit it had and then lodged a complaint against umpiring standards. In many sports umpiring errors cost a match. It is only a sports.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sunil Natekar
Dissenting Rohit Sharma docked 50 per cent of his match fee
by Sunil Natekar on Apr 25, 2017 01:11 PM  | Hide replies

This is unfair, as umpiring is very ordinary specially against Mumbai in this season and if umpires doing mistakes, then you have the right to show your feelings.
Instead of cutting fee from Rohit, take some action against umpires.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
anil philip
Re: Dissenting Rohit Sharma docked 50 per cent of his match fee
by anil philip on Apr 25, 2017 01:16 PM
Why unfair...Rohit moved across the crease and the bowl was bowled wide for that..Umpire cant give a Wide ball since he moved so much..and you certainly cannot have an argument with the umpire on that. His fine is deserved

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Human
Re: Dissenting Rohit Sharma docked 50 per cent of his match fee
by Human on Apr 25, 2017 01:17 PM
Mumbai lose because of umpire they were requiring 11 runs in 4 deliveries, and if umpire would have given wide, which it was then it would have reduced to 10 in 4, and because of that decision, Rohit was frustrated and his wicket was fallen on next ball.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
arijit roy
Re: Dissenting Rohit Sharma docked 50 per cent of his match fee
by arijit roy on Apr 25, 2017 01:58 PM
he got it lightly... he should have been banned for a few games...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Srinivas
Re: Dissenting Rohit Sharma docked 50 per cent of his match fee
by Srinivas on Apr 25, 2017 01:58 PM
Sunil, the umpire was absolutely FAIR. The ball was outside the guideline, but well within the batsman's reach because he moved outside the off stump. By your logic, if a batsman gets outside the guideline (off or leg) and the ball goes between his legs, it should be deemed a wide !!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 15 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message