If MI would have got a extra ball and a run for wide ball the cheapest of winning was more. One ball made all the difference. First the umpire makes a blunder and then punishes a player for objecting for it. This is not cricket. The game will lose its charm. Its like dictetorship over players by umpires. If a player has to pay fine so should a umpire also pay for wrong decision.
If MI would have got a extra ball and a run for wide ball the cheapest of winning was more. One ball made all the difference. First the umpire makes a blunder and then punishes a player for objecting for it. This is not cricket. The game will lose its charm. Its like dictetorship over players by umpires. If a player has to pay fine so should a umpire also pay for wrong decision.
If MI would have got a extra ball and a run for wide ball the cheapest of winning was more. One ball made all the difference. First the umpire makes a blunder and then punishes a player for objecting for it. This is not cricket. The game will lose its charm. Its like dictetorship over players by umpires. If a player has to pay fine so should a umpire also pay for wrong decision.
If MI would have got a extra ball and a run for wide ball the cheapest of winning was more. One ball made all the difference. First the umpire makes a blunder and then punishes a player for objecting for it. This is not cricket. The game will lose its charm. Its like dictetorship over players by umpires. If a player has to pay fine so should a umpire also pay for wrong decision.
If MI would have got a extra ball and a run for wide ball the cheapest of winning was more. One ball made all the difference. First the umpire makes a blunder and then punishes a player for objecting for it. This is not cricket. The game will lose its charm. Its like dictetorship over players by umpires. If a player has to pay fine so should a umpire also pay for wrong decision.
If MI would have got a extra ball and a run for wide ball the cheapest of winning was more. One ball made all the difference. First the umpire makes a blunder and then punishes a player for objecting for it. This is not cricket. The game will lose its charm. Its like dictetorship over players by umpires. If a player has to pay fine so should a umpire also pay for wrong decision.
If MI would have got a extra ball and a run for wide ball the cheapest of winning was more. One ball made all the difference. First the umpire makes a blunder and then punishes a player for objecting for it. This is not cricket. The game will lose its charm. Its like dictetorship over players by umpires. If a player has to pay fine so should a umpire also pay for wrong decision.
If MI would have got a extra ball and a run for wide ball the cheapest of winning was more. One ball made all the difference. First the umpire makes a blunder and then punishes a player for objecting for it. This is not cricket. The game will lose its charm. Its like dictetorship over players by umpires. If a player has to pay fine so should a umpire also pay for wrong decision.
