DRS for LBW should be used only in two cases 1) to see whether there was a knick. 2) To see whether ball pitched outside the leg stump It should not be used for ball hitting the stumps. What has not happened and which cannot be predicted correctly cannot be used for decisions. Trajectory of ball by computer/camera may not be 100% correct.
This one man opposed it during his playing days and did not allow it to be implemented. Now he is playing no more, and seeing DRS is implemented, he is finding reasons for justifying himself. Technology has been changing/improving year by year, and if you are saying that present one is OK but the past one was not, then what you said OK during your times, was not so in times before you. But no one was a staunch opposer of improvements, even with its flaws, as this man was.
Re: double edged sword
by Aam Aadmi on Nov 15, 2016 10:28 PM
"I am not against DRS, but I feel it will be more effective with the support of the Snickometer and Hot Spot technology. This will give more consistent results"-Sachin Tendulkar in 2011
