Discussion Board

Controversy at Lord's: Stokes given out for 'obstructing the field'


Total 7 messages Pages | 1
kersy pavri
Not out
by kersy pavri on Sep 07, 2015 11:13 AM  | Hide replies

Here the slow motion has failed miserably.BCCI may agree.This was the clear cut case of instant reflex.Any person will try to protect himself if the ball is thrown in his direction.Besides Stokes was looking at the bowler & not at the wicket nor trying to cover the same.Third class decision by the third umpire.the matter should not have gone upstairs at ll.Repeat Not out.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
venkat shivaram
Re: Not out
by venkat shivaram on Sep 07, 2015 04:34 PM
I agree with you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
praveenp rao
out
by praveenp rao on Sep 06, 2015 03:08 PM

He is out clearly obstructing the ball....
No need to go to third umpire..
You are such an idiot Stokes.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ramesh Kapoor
2 other sickening decisions!
by Ramesh Kapoor on Sep 06, 2015 11:45 AM

Handled the ball and hit the ball twice! I had to give out on appeal way back in late 70s and early 80s.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 7 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message