Sreesenth has got away only because the probe was not handled in the right manner. These so called cricketers should be put on LIE DETECTOR TESTS, the truth will come out immediately and the courts do not have to waste its productive time and energy. The culprits will be brought to justice with a day.
Re: BCCI has 2 different set of rules.
by Sri Das on Jul 30, 2015 01:48 PM
so you know everything about match fixing...were you one of the bookie...when the court finds him and other 35 not guilty, how do you alone think that the case was not handled properly...if we are not sure of the case and if we don't know anything at all, then it is better to keep quiet...rather than bragging...hope you don't end up cuffed for talking against the Delhi Police
When a player has been turned as innocent then why is the BCCI not allowing him to play. Well he has done no crime. Is there a policy of discriminating a player from the south not to participate in the team. Well if Sreeshant is a promising player and can prove himself then he should be there in the team. It is best to give him a chance as many have got. If it dosen't then it is best to have another cricketing body in India for cricket. BCCI has done enough !
Re: BCCI has two different ways of seeing things
by jaya seelan on Jul 30, 2015 04:26 PM
Yes! The Board has to allow him to play he his really Very Good Player.
