without realizing the quality of Indian fast bowlers. It will be in the best interest of India to play two pacers and two spinners. This is a big mistake India did in the first three tests. Raina should come in place of Rahul and he will be a decent addition to the bowling resources as well since he bowls regularly in IPL. Probably,Chappell realizes that batting is a strong point for India and is trying to weaken it by suggesting only five regular batsmen.
Re: Chappell's suggestion not genuine
by smruti ranjan on Jan 03, 2015 09:17 PM
if taking challenge.then my players will play.if combining.then Australia will win/100% ve.Then our strategies will here shown. axar patel is obvious hero.but future need run.then this test match.6 top bats man need.these 6 top.minmum 3 is spinner. test match no needy of spinner.
Re: Re: Chappell's suggestion not genuine
by sivaji theboss on Jan 03, 2015 09:24 PM
if not taking challenge.then their players will nt play.if not combining.then Australia will not win/100% ve.Then their strategies will not here shown. axar patel is not obvious hero.but present need run.then this test match.6 top bats man no need.these 6 bottom.minmum 2 is spinner. test match yes needy of spinner.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Chappell's suggestion not genuine
by Mike Teflon on Jan 03, 2015 11:30 PM
hahahaha.. sorry for laughing everyone.. yep, these guys make our day. Suboda Barik in particular..
Yes, Ian is right and the Indian bowlers failed to bowl on length. The media particualrly SS commentary team has failed to point out. unless the bowlers bowl on length they won't take all twenty wickets overseas anymore. Hats off to Ian
Re: Re: About Chappel's comment
by Mike Teflon on Jan 03, 2015 11:33 PM
I understand your perspective, but do you think, an oldie and a veteran like Ian Chappell has the need to coerce India into poor decision making...
Don't you think, he wanted a little more competitiveness injected into the contest to make it more interesting for all..
