use in best tricks . then everything is possible.i am telling here. means time wise putting. but murali will last or imbalance stage is coming sending. bcoz before dhoni with aswin exam. like putting try to best.
Re: Re: none r well played. sending first.
by Subodha Barik on Dec 29, 2014 06:54 PM
tell all bowlers type is balancing.just think before ball this.like example of ball throwing before ,just going 3 direction. or ball is 100% . only one direction. before standing player in long on/off perfectly w.r.t different motion.Tell today.what i am telling not miss match. mind it.
it is very problematic.bcoz getting wrong decision. no issue about 4th umpire.bcoz before telling 4th umpire is best.what condition for wrong decision. only suspended for ever or appointing new umpire or salary deduct or not allowing world cup.or Tv signal any curvature happening in between in 50;50.or any mistake is happening. is it right.
Re: i am selecting. austrlia will collapse.
by Subodha Barik on Dec 29, 2014 06:29 PM
but my selection is required. always umpire wrong decision taking.what u doing.Think about in rahane case. Today 2 lbw. is going wrong decision. as compareing with rahane decision. with one globe connection or not 60:40? then what will be doing. 3 match is wrong decision.
Re: Re: i am selecting. austrlia will collapse.
by Subodha Barik on Dec 29, 2014 06:31 PM
better telling rahane style playing is best. bcoz full concetration on ball.then before or right time will be connect in properly.or tomorrow what will be doing.
Re: what felings today. those day i am write something.
by Subodha Barik on Dec 29, 2014 06:20 PM
if doing ."just require design" my action then first test will be win.tomorrow doing or not in my action.
Re: what felings today. those day i am write something.
by Subodha Barik on Dec 29, 2014 06:22 PM
4th test what will be doing. tomorrow what will be doing.
As I agree with Rahul sir, Indian team should play test cricket more rather than 50 over cricket. But there is one more thing which has to be added i.e. keep test cricket team different & one day & T20 cricket team different. The reason behind is test cricket requires skills & energy on fielding, bowling & batting also whereas in one day & T20 format fielding plays a very vital role & bowling to some extent. Then only the level of cricket improves better.
I suppose, Dravid is being diplomatic here..If Chucking is a technical fault, it should be corrected at formative years itself. Once you get into International cricket, there are no concessions..
Chucking is done intentionally, in order to derive some kinda benefit, be it a surprise ball or whatever..
Chucking is criminal intent period. NO second thought about it.
Re: SCRAP 15DEG ARBITRARY RULE FOR SPINNERS
by damodaran mohan on Sep 15, 2014 04:58 PM
(contd.)..(contd.)..Even with ‘chucking’ one is not assured of a wicket.Besides, reporting ‘chucking’ by itself is problematic for field umpires especially for spinners. For pacers it could be a easier job. So what is the big deal why not scrap the archaic ‘chucking ‘ law for at least ‘spinners’ and make it legal and avoid all the controversies and troubles ?
Re: Re: SCRAP 15DEG ARBITRARY RULE FOR SPINNERS
by Mike Teflon on Sep 15, 2014 07:52 PM
why not legalize fixing, spot fixing, corruption, rape, killing, arson, loot.. you name it bro,
Re: Re: Re: Re: SCRAP 15DEG ARBITRARY RULE FOR SPINNERS
by pravin sarode on Sep 15, 2014 10:34 PM
exorcise the ghost of M.fixing then only cricket will survive
Dravid says ‘chucking’ is not a crime but aren’t they treated like ‘crminals’ once reported for chucking ? Fact of the matter is the 15 deg rule is a bad law as ‘chucking’ cannot be reported consistently and thus not implementable fairly. On the top of it ICC is now gets a cranky brainwave to use technology to correct ‘chucking’! Silly indeed.This use of technology cannot be compared to DRS which doesn't bother or mess with individual players having to wear some 'detectors' etc. Why should any players agree for that ? Game of Cricket has been evolving for over a century and now it has metamorphed into shorter versions during last 5-6 decades and are going to stay. Any rule or law which is difficult to enforce due to confusion in ‘detection’ needs review. This 15deg ‘chucking’ rule appears to be one such rule difficult to enforce mainly because the detection is difficult and creates lot of controversy. Correcting ‘chucking’ through lab trials is even worse as the field and lab conditions are totally different and player can always bowl differently under the two conditions and hoodwink. Question is to what extent does ‘excess bending’ gives advantage in taking more wickets for a spinner? No clear answer. How many more wickets the so called ‘chucker’ managed due to that extra bending ? No clear answer again. Even with ‘chucking’ one is not a
Re: SCRAP ARBITRARY 15DEG RULE FOR SPINNERS
by damodaran mohan on Sep 15, 2014 04:56 PM
(contd.)..Even with ‘chucking’ one is not assured of a wicket.Besides, reporting ‘chucking’ by itself is problematic for field umpires especially for spinners. For pacers it could be a easier job. So what is the big deal why not scrap the archaic ‘chucking ‘ law for at least ‘spinners’ and make it legal and avoid all the controversies and troubles ?hym3k
