Discussion Board

'There is no point in just writing a book without being honest'


Total 38 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Srinivas
Hypocritical
by Srinivas on Nov 11, 2014 06:34 PM  | Hide replies

There are 5 players who have spat venom at Greg Chappell (before, in and after SRT's book) - Sachin, Ganguly, VVS, Zaheer & Harbhajan. What's the common thread between them ? All of them would have ranked very poor, from an athleticism/ agility/ mobility perspective in the outfield. Isn't it therefore possible that Chappell wanted a stronger fielding ethic (remember 7 - 8 years back, India was not a great fielding side) and this set of players could not or did not want to adapt to this ethic ? And hence found other reasons to criticise Chappell ?

Sachin has also found fault with Adam Gilchrist for appealing against Dravid in the 2008 Sydney test, when he would have known that Dravid was not out. Really ? How naive, Sachin ? Have you not appealed, even when you knew that an opponent batsman was not out ? Or did you walk when you were out ? I vaguely remember an occasion when you were caught behind, but were given not out and continued. If you expect integrity from your opponents, you must also display this quality.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Varadarajan Ravindran
Re: Hypocritical
by Varadarajan Ravindran on Nov 12, 2014 05:42 AM
All the five players are high achievers and have carved a place for themselves in cricket history by extra-ordinary plays and incredible wins. Greg Chappell wanted mediocre performance for all of them, provided they were completely under his control. What a policy! What a cricket board! What a press and media! And, what a nation!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Srinivas
Hypocritical
by Srinivas on Nov 11, 2014 06:34 PM

There are 5 players who have spat venom at Greg Chappell (before, in and after SRT's book) - Sachin, Ganguly, VVS, Zaheer & Harbhajan. What's the common thread between them ? All of them would have ranked very poor, from an athleticism/ agility/ mobility perspective in the outfield. Isn't it therefore possible that Chappell wanted a stronger fielding ethic (remember 7 - 8 years back, India was not a great fielding side) and this set of players could not or did not want to adapt to this ethic ? And hence found other reasons to criticise Chappell ?

Sachin has also found fault with Adam Gilchrist for appealing against Dravid in the 2008 Sydney test, when he would have known that Dravid was not out. Really ? How naive, Sachin ? Have you not appealed, even when you knew that an opponent batsman was not out ? Or did you walk when you were out ? I vaguely remember an occasion when you were caught behind, but were given not out and continued. If you expect integrity from your opponents, you must also display this quality.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
sudhir sood
tendu...
by sudhir sood on Nov 11, 2014 05:56 PM

the biggest lie is that he wrote the book; he is not even a high school pass out; something based of this fundamental lie can hardly be truthful

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 38 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message