I do not idolize him and have the same view -timing of all things -why now ! what were you doing then with so much influence on BCCI and past cricketers ! 2000 or a bit earlier Indian cricketers are not the same - brash ,arrogant claiming that is tough way of playing the game
Re: Sachin!
by madanmohan siddhanthi on Nov 09, 2014 07:07 PM
More so how he got rid of customs duty with the help of politicians and made a good money when he sold
Autobiographies reveal less than One expects them to. I haven't read the autobiography but I am very sure it would reflect the selective memory/ amnesia of this guy. BTW does he mention the Ferrari gate in his autobiography?
Craddock correctly analysed sachin, he is little boy in him, so he could resist the hunger for run, sportsmanship of the Australians world know, if any clarification required ask England and South Africa. when he was in the field he proved his strength with his bat. By the way, it not bad to be politically correct always, so u are saying that he should try in politics as well. I till date have a doubt the Greg chappell has ever bent to reach a ball, this the kind of attitude he has as a coach.
Re: Batting
by Ankur Deb on Nov 09, 2014 07:15 PM
just forget about Sachin saying anything about chappel, take a look on Australia's one of the greatest batsman Andrew symonds. when he retired he himself revealed what chappel have done during that period.. he told that it was chappel who used to give secret advice to the aussies how to sledge indian cricketers and told the weak points of all players including sachin... now ask if sachin wrote anything bad about the "great saint" chappel.
Dear Craadock Tendulkar was and is a thorough gentleman always. Where as most Australian cricketers and probably most of Australians were Baaastaaards anyway all their lives. So make no mistake if Tendulkar says Chappel was a schmer then he was no doubt about it. Just one look at his face says it all doesnt it