Not accepting DRS is simply typical Indian typical orthodox mentality. Being adamant and doing wrong things is called fo olishness. I would prefer from now on that all umpires in test matches should give important wrong decisions against India so that it affectthe result. India cannot complain as they have no DRS. Let India loose and it is fun to watch the fo ol country cry.
There is nothing called 100% fool proof technology. The websites and other technically safeguarded information are being breached and compromized regularly across the world. BCCI should wake up to the reality that 100% fool proof technology never exists in the world and is not going to come too. Accept the DRS and come out with more suggestion to improve it.
Former players want DRS because it would have helped India in the current series. Does it mean that it was not required earlier, because India was getting the benefit of wrong umpiring decisions ? DRS is meant to eliminate the obvious error, to help the umpire, and make the result of a match dependent on the performance of the players rather than the umpires's mistakes. It was worked well internationally for all Boards, barring the BCCI. The sooner BCCI adopts it, the better for the game.
skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni says that the tourists are being more hard done by at least five contentious umpiring decisions in the lost first two Tests against Australia;But he continued to hold the view that having DRS would not help the side's cause too much.Because he knows that apart from any odd tailender,the rest batters will not profit from a DRS review and face upto the demands of battling it out at the center.Atleast he knows the truth.
Re: DhoniRightSir
by suresh kumar on Dec 21, 2014 02:17 PM
It is a ploy by Aussies and England to pressurise India also to fall in line. Human error factor going always against India is not by chance, by choice! error goes in favour of Warner atleast two occasions, when LBW appeals were turn down.
