The bizarre explanation by Dhoni about DRS sums up the whole attitude, at least it can avoid howlers. Why does not BCCI agree for simple catch decisions when there is no bat involved or inside snick in LBW decisions? At least these can be reviewed with DRS right? In both tests, India got bad decisions and had DRS been there, at least these could have easily reverted back and now blaming umpires for wrong decision is entirely wrong. At least howlers can be avoided by DRS?
Re: Stubborn BCCI attitude on DRS
by anil k c on Dec 20, 2014 07:32 PM
India has no right to complain against wrong decisions...may be the indians are against DRs because it prevents them from fixing matches when played at home and also in IPL.
Re: Re: Stubborn BCCI attitude on DRS
by David Coulthard on Dec 20, 2014 08:04 PM
Precisely. The average Indian still does not accept the fact that most Indian matches are rigged: Only Tests are exceptions and that's where India lose outrageously but come ODI or T20, India is right on top. Figure this out
Re: expect 4-0 whitewash
by Ashish Kumar on Dec 20, 2014 07:56 PM
Both current and previous teams have had captaincy aspirants making life difficult for the Team. Earlier it was Sahawag-Gambhir duo. Now it is Kohli. Such aspirants can do well only when they are made captains. Our press also keeps blowing up such issues. But is not that our national character?
Re: Then why did you
by Shirish Saha on Dec 20, 2014 07:15 PM
DRS has got some drawbacks sir. whether matches are fixed or not fixed whether DRS or no DRS we are no match for Aussies down under.
In this test match day 4 India lost to OZ few warng decision by vmipire and feexed series and people wating time and mooney.. to watch puneesh the teeam bharaat on day5 with keck and fawek
