In USA presidents, governors, senators are usually wealthy business owners with commercial interest. They want the US economy to improve not just for the country but also for their businesses also. Unless there is proof of some insider trading or malpractice, there shouldn't be a reason why a businessman cannot be an administrator of a public organisation.
Re: Why not?
by on Dec 18, 2014 09:49 AM
Why do you bring US into cricket? US is not ideal in terms of morality anyway. Do you suggest we should have the right to carry guns in India? Or our Election Commission should follow US? Remember how Bush was elected? US is irrelevant here.
Re: Why not?
by sam raj on Dec 18, 2014 12:09 AM
In India, SC is unnecessarily poking its nose into Business and Games which is none of their Business, just to show-off their supremacy
Re: Re: Re: Why not?
by Abstract baba on Dec 18, 2014 02:49 PM
This has been happening since the Ranji trophy was being played. Why is the cry coming now? This process was started to stop fixing, unfortunately the main issue is transgressed now.
Re: bcci clean up
by peelid d on Dec 18, 2014 03:08 AM
It is not the people it is the system. What you need to have a very balanced system with de-centralized power centers. This will make no one above others and one man can't dictate the terms.
Re: Re: bcci clean up
by on Dec 18, 2014 09:53 AM
The whole problem is a national sports is managed by a private club called BCCI. It is registered under Societies Registration Act just like your neighbourhood club.
