Discussion Board

Srinivasan says he consulted Pawar before buying CSK


Total 41 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Raju iyyar
Another Crook name
by Raju iyyar on Dec 01, 2014 08:45 PM

There you go..... another crook name has come out !!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Santosh Kamble
NA
by Santosh Kamble on Dec 01, 2014 08:33 PM  | Hide replies

Like the comment "even dawood has consulted" :)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
siva
Re: NA
by siva on Dec 01, 2014 08:47 PM
:) Thanks for the good Laugh. so true.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jagdish Dubey
Why no body is questioning the other fellow in the photo?
by Jagdish Dubey on Dec 01, 2014 07:24 PM

He was all powerful those days, always seen walking so close to the ex PM?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Prince Aniston
whether Pawar is ..............
by Prince Aniston on Dec 01, 2014 06:43 PM  | Hide replies

legal advisor of Srinivasan?
if pawar say buy Tajmahal, will srini buy?
tommarrow mayappan wil also say he had consulted Pawar before doing betting


    Forward  |  Report abuse
jegadeesan durai
Re: whether Pawar is ..............
by jegadeesan durai on Dec 01, 2014 07:54 PM
Hi dumb ! Pawar was the BCCI Chief then hence he is also accountable like Srini and SC has to ban Pawar also from conducting elections

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Raman Krishnaswamy
Re: whether Pawar is ..............
by Raman Krishnaswamy on Dec 01, 2014 09:25 PM
Who knows ? May be Meiyappan was betting for Pawar as his proxy

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sameer
Robber asking the dacoit
by sameer on Dec 01, 2014 06:18 PM

A petty thief asking the Dacoit can i steal in your area hahahaha. After the Mughals if anyone has looted this country its the man with the crooked face

    Forward  |  Report abuse
slumdogAmerican
"private company there would be no issue"
by slumdogAmerican on Dec 01, 2014 05:59 PM  | Hide replies

Guys read this line carefully used by Srinivasan Uncle's Lawyer in Supreme Court today..

"BCCI is private company there would be no issue"

Guys, they are making us fool & even government approved them as Official Team India & provide them Tax concession, space for Grounds & clubs & most of all Electricity, security & all the facility, which inturn should be provided to common man..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
adam smith
Re:
by adam smith on Dec 01, 2014 06:29 PM
If BCCI is a ‘private company’ then it should be charged for use of grounds, electricity consumed, security provided, as well as usage of all other facilities - just as any other ‘private’ enterprise would be charged. BCCI should be made to pay tax on all its earnings, including gate money collected, advertisement fee, earnings from TV rights etc. etc.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 41 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message