The title of the story says it all. It is just that another cricketer would ever have anything to do with his "achievements" Nothing worth even mentioning to anyone outside rotten world of Indian cricket.
His all achievements are personal only and use them to make money nothing else
HE PLAYED FOR BUILDING money and fame not for any social cause, he did not do anything for society or country
He do his for won only for own as every common ppl do, Cricket is not essentials of life or humanity ppl are more in peace who do not watch or play, and when most of ppl say the truth then some dogs start favoring probably get might be some pieces from him which he throw in front these people. These kinds of d@gs make him GOD and keep make themselves fool by thought he get someday big prize from their GOD
Re: Sachin
by Sudhakaran Nair on Oct 28, 2013 02:22 PM
He should have retired after winning the world-cup. He has not done that and is spoiling his name. Even in Ranji he is out for 4 runs.
Why only a crickter can value another cricketer's achievements? A politician can also argue in the same lines ; only a politician can value (evaluate) fellow-politicians' deeds. Don't say now that 'my words are misintrepreted and what I meant by a cricketer is a cricketer or cricket-lover', like politicians do. What Mr. Prabhakar is trying to say with this statement is not relevant to be published for public scrutiny. But, not surprised - current crop of editors in most of the media houses does not know what is proper for publishing / airing in public domains.
