Discussion Board

Srinivasan says he hasn't been asked to quit


Total 39 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3
v radhakrishna nair
No comment!
by v radhakrishna nair on May 29, 2013 03:58 PM  | Hide replies

What to comment of someone who has no shame,moral character and call of inner voice, which only honest man, man of Truth, like Gnadhiji, can hear!?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
kumar kn
Re: No comment!
by kumar kn on May 29, 2013 04:02 PM
There is a cartoon in one of the English papers showing both Srinivasan and Man Mohan Singh glued to the chair with Fevicol and both refusing to quit.What a fall from the standards of Gandhiji & Lal Bahadur Shastri to now Srinivasan and MMS!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
nailesh kumar
Re: No comment!
by nailesh kumar on May 29, 2013 04:50 PM
fear the conscious not the world, u will going to take the consious along with u not the Noise around. If someone is adamant and says i will not resign of my own, if you want to remove u can. This shows he is afraid only of his conscious not the world

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ajay prasad
POOR SRINIWASAN
by ajay prasad on May 29, 2013 03:56 PM  | Hide replies

YA TRUE , YOU WOULD BE FORCED TO QUIT

    Forward  |  Report abuse
v radhakrishna nair
Re: POOR SRINIWASAN
by v radhakrishna nair on May 29, 2013 04:03 PM
Why the majority members are not voting him out...Birds of same feather folk together ..that is the problem with Indian democratic institutions...What a pity indeed! If majority does not kick someone whom they know as corrupt..what is the meaning of Majority , two third, this and that, and this is a black day in the democratic function of BCCI

   Forward   |   Report abuse
My way
Re: POOR SRINIWASAN
by My way on May 29, 2013 04:12 PM
His crime ???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bhawesh tanna
Re: Re: POOR SRINIWASAN
by bhawesh tanna on May 29, 2013 05:23 PM
His crime is that knowing his son in law has committed crime, he want to shield his all wrong doing. How come his son in law became nobody from team owner. Who allowed him to access all areas if he is not the owner. It could be only him, no body else could have given that freedom to his son in law. Either he has lied that his son in law is not the owner or he has allowed his son in law to do whatever he wanted. srinivasan just turned a blind eye..How could Srinivasan (BCCI chief) himself not follow the rules laid down by them that only Owner was allowed to do what his son in law was doing. This is a serious breach of code of conduct by srinivasan. Hence he should resign

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 39 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3
Write a message