Re: watson
by archana dass on May 16, 2013 11:41 AM
Hi!,can u pls tell me what Watson did, b'coz MI is my team and everyone in my family is criticizing Pollard but if it was a reaction to what Watson did then I have no complaints against Pollard.
Re: Re: watson
by ashok on May 16, 2013 11:49 AM
Hi, I think you have not watched the episode of watson, maxwell game. Please check the highlights. When you see it you will regret for what you wrote about Pollard.
Re: Re: watson
by Santosh Rane on May 16, 2013 11:54 AM
Yes, you are correct Rohit. Watson is the one of those players who always try to sledge opposite teams players. And if anyone does this against him then how its not fair? So i am in support of Pollard and MI.
Re: Re: Re: watson
by ukuser on May 16, 2013 12:58 PM
Typical Aussie attitude my friend. Holier than Thou. Amazing thing is the Great Gentleman Dravid is angry.
Re: Re: watson
by Shashank Parab on May 16, 2013 12:41 PM
Watson kept screaming wildly for at least 10 seconds i guess. This is surely against the sport spirit that Dravid is talking about.
Re: watson
by ukuser on May 16, 2013 12:56 PM
Dravid was playing the role of Gandhari at that time. Later he opened his eyes when his team was batting.
IPL is really a phenomenon to be studied !!! It turns gentlemen like Dravid into cry-babies. Dravid never reacted the way he did in the Mumbai match throughout his career. Don't tell me he didn't face high pressure situations before this. What act of cowardice is Mr.Dravid talking about ? He needs to be reminded about the India-Aus test where Watson was the skipper.The way debutant Rahane was bullied was similar to college ragging.Was that an act of valour by Dravid's RR team-mate.The Aussies are known to act as sissies when they get a taste of their own medicine.Dravid better not spoil his so-called 'gentleman' image.
Re: IPL & Dravid
by perur prasad on May 16, 2013 11:31 AM
mr jayesh you are too small a person to have view on Dravid and especially you cannot teach him about '"gentleman' game.his message is too subtle for you to understand.when someone is given out he is already down and out and to point finger at him and overceleberate is indecent.you are quoting past events out of context.
